radhydРадиационная гигиенаRadiatsionnaya Gygiena = Radiation Hygiene1998-426X2409-9082NIIRG10.21514/1998-426X-2018-11-3-83-91radhyd-569Research ArticleОбзорыReviewsПРОБЛЕМЫ РИСК-КОММУНИКАЦИИ ПРИ ОБЕСПЕЧЕНИИ РАДИАЦИОННОЙ БЕЗОПАСНОСТИ НАСЕЛЕНИЯ: ОСНОВНЫЕ ПОНЯТИЯ И ОПРЕДЕЛЕНИЯPROBLEMS OF RISK COMMUNICATION RELATED TO THE PROVISION OF THE RADIATION SAFETY. BASIC CONCEPTS AND DEFINITIONSРепинЛ. В.RepinL. V.

Репин Леонид Викторович – младший научный сотрудник Информационно-аналитического центра. 

Санкт-Петербург.

 Leonid V. Repin – Junior Researcher, Information Analytical Center.

 Saint-Petersburg. 

l.repin@niirg.ruБиблинА. М.BiblinA. M.

Библин Артём Михайлович – и.о. руководителя Информационно-аналитического центра, младший научный сотрудник. 

Санкт-Петербург.

Artem M. Biblin – Head, Information Analytical Center.

Saint-Petersburg. 

ВишняковаН. М.VishnyakovaN. M.

Вишнякова Надежда Михайловна – доктор медицинских наук, заместитель директора по научной работе. 

Санкт-Петербург.

Nadezhda M. Vishnyakova – Doctor of Medical Sciences, Deputy Director.

Saint-Petersburg. 

Санкт-Петербургский научно-исследовательский институт радиационной гигиены имени профессора П.В. Рамзаева, Федеральная служба по надзору в сфере защиты прав потребителей и благополучия человека.РоссияSaint-Petersburg Research Institute of Radiation Hygiene after Professor P.V. Ramzaev, Federal Service for Surveillance on Consumer Rights Protection and Human Well-Being.Russian Federation2018031020181138391Copyright © Репин Л.В., Библин А.М., Вишнякова Н.М., 20182018Репин Л.В., Библин А.М., Вишнякова Н.М.Repin L.V., Biblin A.M., Vishnyakova N.M.Данная работа распространяется под лицензией Creative Commons Attribution 4.0.This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.https://www.radhyg.ru/jour/article/view/569рисканализ рисковионизирующее излучениеинформирование о рискерисккоммуникациярадиационная безопасностьriskrisk analysisionizing radiationrisk informationrisk communicationradiation safetyReferencesОнищенко, Г.Г. Анализ риска здоровью в стратегии государственного социально-экономического развития: монография / Г.Г. Онищенко, Н.В. Зайцева, И.В. Май [и др.]; под общ. ред. Г.Г. Онищенко, Н.В. Зайцевой. – Пермь: Изд-во Перм. нац. исслед. политехн. ун-та., 2014. – 738 с.Onischenko G.G., Zaytseva N.V., May I.V. [et al.] Health risk analysis in the strategy of state social and economic development: monograph. In: G.G. Onischenko, N.V. Zaitseva eds. Perm, Publishing house of Perm National Research Polytechnic University, 2014, 783 p. (in Russian).Здоровье и окружающая среда: принципы коммуникации риска. – Копенгаген: Европейское региональное бюро ВОЗ, 2013. – 68 c.Health and environment: communicating the risks. Copenhagen, WHO Regional Office for Europe, 2013, 68 p. (In Russian).Covello VT, Sandman PM. Risk communication: evolution and revolution. In: Wolbarst A, ed. Solutions to an Environment in Peril. Baltimore, MD: John Hopkins University Press; 2001:164–178.Covello VT, Sandman PM. Risk communication: evolution and revolution. In: Wolbarst A, ed. Solutions to an Environment in Peril. Baltimore, MD: John Hopkins University Press; 2001 pp.164–178.Leiss W. Three phases in the evolution of risk communication practice. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 1996, Vol. 545, №. 1, pp. 85-94.Leiss W. Three phases in the evolution of risk communication practice //The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 1996, V. 545, №. 1, pp. 85-94.Wildavsky A., Dake K. Theories of risk perception: Who fears what and why? Daedalus, 1990, pp. 41-60.Wildavsky A., Dake K. Theories of risk perception: Who fears what and why? Daedalus, 1990, pp. 41-60.Siegrist M., Cvetkovich G. Perception of hazards: The role of social trust and knowledge. Risk analysis, 2000, Vol. 20, №. 5, pp. 713-720.Siegrist M., Cvetkovich G. Perception of hazards: The role of social trust and knowledge. Risk analysis, 2000, V. 20, №. 5, pp. 713-720.Dierkes M. [et al]. Between understanding and trust: the public, science and technology. Routledge, 2005.Dierkes M. [et al.] Between understanding and trust: the public, science and technology. Routledge, 2005.Sandman P. M. Responding to community outrage: Strategies for effective risk communication. AIHA, 1993.Sandman P.M. Responding to community outrage: Strategies for effective risk communication. AIHA, 1993.Архангельская, Г.В. Трудности информирования населения по вопросам радиационной безопасности / Г.В. Архангельская, И.А. Зыкова, С.А. Зеленцова // Радиационная гигиена. – 2014. – Т. 7, № 2. – С. 42-49.Arkhangelskaya G.V., Zykova I.А., Zelentsova S.А. The difficulties of informing the population on the issues of radiation protection. Radiatsionnaya gygiena = Radiation Hygiene, 2014, Vol. 7, No 2, pp. 42-49. (In Russian).Covello V.T. Risk communication, radiation, and radiological emergencies: strategies, tools, and techniques. Health physics, 2011, Vol. 101, №. 5, pp. 511-530.Covello V.T. Risk communication, radiation, and radiological emergencies: strategies, tools, and techniques. Health physics, 2011, Vol. 101, №. 5, pp. 511-530.Perko T. Importance of risk communication during and after a nuclear accident. Integrated environmental assessment and management, 2011, Vol. 7, №. 3, pp. 388-392.Perko T. Importance of risk communication during and after a nuclear accident. Integrated environmental assessment and management, 2011, Vol. 7, №. 3, pp. 388-392.Murakami M., Tsubokura M. Evaluating risk communication after the Fukushima disaster based on nudge theory. Asia Pacific Journal of Public Health, 2017, Vol. 29, №. 2_suppl., pp. 193S-200S.Murakami M., Tsubokura M. Evaluating risk communication after the Fukushima disaster based on nudge theory. Asia Pacific Journal of Public Health, 2017, Vol. 29, №. 2_suppl., pp. 193S-200S.Figueroa P.M. Risk communication surrounding the Fukushima nuclear disaster: an anthropological approach. Asia Europe Journal, 2013, Vol. 11, №. 1, pp. 53-64.Figueroa P.M. Risk communication surrounding the Fukushima nuclear disaster: an anthropological approach. Asia Europe Journal, 2013, Vol. 11, №. 1, pp. 53-64.Robertson A.G., Pengilley A. Fukushima nuclear incident: the challenges of risk communication. Asia Pacific Journal of Public Health, 2012, Vol. 24, №. 4, pp. 689-696.Robertson A.G., Pengilley A. Fukushima nuclear incident: the challenges of risk communication. Asia Pacific Journal of Public Health, 2012, Vol. 24, №. 4, pp. 689-696.Hyer R.N., Covello V.T. Breaking bad news in the highconcern, low trust setting: how to get your story heard. Health physics, 2017, Vol. 112, №. 2, pp. 111-115.Hyer R.N., Covello V.T. Breaking bad news in the high-concern, low trust setting: how to get your story heard. Health physics, 2017, Vol. 112, №. 2, pp. 111-115.Барг, А.О. Риск-коммуникация в сфере здоровья как вид социальной коммуникации / А.О. Барг // Дискуссия. – 2017. – №1. – С. 50–55.Barg A.O. Risk-communication in the sphere of health as a sort of social communication. Discussion, 2017, №1 (75), pp. 50–55. (In Russian).Барг, А.О. Риск-коммуникация как механизм формирования адекватной оценки рисков для здоровья населения / А.О. Барг, Н.А. Лебедева-Несевря // Здоровье населения и среда обитания. – 2014. – Т. 261, № 12. – С. 9–11.Barg A.O., Lebedeva-Nesevrya N.A. Risk-communication is an effective way of producing the cumulative acceptability of human health risks. Population Health and Life Environment, 2014, V. 261, № 12, pp. 9-11. (In Russian).Мелихова, Е.М. О некоторых механизмах социального усиления восприятия риска для здоровья при освещении в СМИ аварии на АЭС Фукусима / Е.М. Мелихова, Е.М. Быркина, Ю.А. Першина // Медицинская радиология и радиационная безопасность. – 2013. – Т. 58, № 4. – С. 5–16.Melikhova Е.М., Byrkina Е.М., Pershina Yu.A. On the Issue of Certain Mechanisms of Social Amplification of Risk in Media Coverage of the Fukushima NPP Nuclear Accident. Meditsinskaya radiologiya i radiatsionnaya bezopasnost = Мedical Radiology and Radiation Safety, 2013, Vol. 58, № 4, pp. 5-16. (In Russian).Зыкова, И.А. Информационные потребности населения в различных радиационно-гигиенических ситуациях / И.А. Зыкова, С.А. Зеленцова, Г.В. Архангельская // Радиационная гигиена. – 2013. – Т. 6, № 4. – С. 11–18.Zykova I.А., Zelentsova S.А., Arkhangelskaya G.V. Information requirements of population in different radiation-hygienic situations. Radiatsionnaya gygiena = Radiation Hygiene, 2013, Vol. 6, No 4, pp. 11-18. (In Russian).Библин, А.М. Методологические подходы к оценке риска для здоровья в гигиенических исследованиях / А.М. Библин //Р адиационная гигиена. – 2013. – Т. 6, № 2. – С. 32–38.Biblin А.М., Zykova I.А., Koroleva Т.М., Nikolaevich М.S. Methodological approaches to assessments of health risks in hygienic research. Radiatsionnaya gygiena = Radiation Hygiene, 2013, Vol. 6, No 2, pp. 32-38. (In Russian).ICRP, 2018. Ethical foundations of the system of radiological protection. ICRP Publication 138. Ann. ICRP 47(1)ICRP, 2018. Ethical foundations of the system of radiological protection. ICRP Publication 138. Ann. ICRP 47(1)Lundgren R.E., McMakin A.H. Risk communication: A handbook for communicating environmental, safety, and health risks. John Wiley & Sons, 2013, 392 p.Lundgren R.E., McMakin A.H. Risk communication: A handbook for communicating environmental, safety, and health risks. John Wiley & Sons, 2013, 392 p.IAEA Safety Glossary. Terminology Used in Nuclear Safety and Radiation Protection. 2016 Revision. Vienna: International Atomic Energy Agency, 2016 https://www.iaea.org/sites/default/files/17/11/iaea-safety-glossary-rev2016.pdf (дата обращения: 01.07.2018).IAEA Safety Glossary. Terminology Used in Nuclear Safety and Radiation Protection. 2016 Revision. Vienna: International Atomic Energy Agency, 2016. – Available on: https://www.iaea.org/sites/default/files/17/11/iaeasafety-glossary-rev2016.pdf (accessed: 01.07.2018)

The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest present.