<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Publishing DTD v1.3 20210610//EN" "JATS-journalpublishing1-3.dtd">
<article article-type="research-article" dtd-version="1.3" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xml:lang="ru"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">radhyd</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title xml:lang="ru">Радиационная гигиена</journal-title><trans-title-group xml:lang="en"><trans-title>Radiatsionnaya Gygiena = Radiation Hygiene</trans-title></trans-title-group></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="ppub">1998-426X</issn><issn pub-type="epub">2409-9082</issn><publisher><publisher-name>NIIRG</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.21514/1998-426X-2021-14-3-126-135</article-id><article-id custom-type="elpub" pub-id-type="custom">radhyd-825</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Research Article</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="section-heading" xml:lang="ru"><subject>Краткие сообщения</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="section-heading" xml:lang="en"><subject>Short messages</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>Оценка поглощенных доз в плоде при проведении компьютерной томографии органов грудной клетки беременной женщины</article-title><trans-title-group xml:lang="en"><trans-title>Assessment of the absorbed doses in the fetus from the computed tomography of the chest for the pregnant women</trans-title></trans-title-group></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes"><name-alternatives><name name-style="eastern" xml:lang="ru"><surname>Водоватов</surname><given-names>А. В.</given-names></name><name name-style="western" xml:lang="en"><surname>Vodovatov</surname><given-names>A. V.</given-names></name></name-alternatives><bio xml:lang="ru"><p>Александр Валерьевич Водоватов, кандидат биологических наук, ведущий научный сотрудник, заведующий лабораторией радиационной гигиены медицинских организаций; доцент кафедры гигиены</p><p>197101, ул. Мира 8, Санкт-Петербург</p></bio><bio xml:lang="en"><p>Aleksandr V. Vodovatov, PhD, Researcher, Head of the Medical Protection Laboratory</p><p>Mira Str., 8, Saint-Petersburg, 197101</p></bio><email xlink:type="simple">vodovatoff@gmail.com</email><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff-1"/></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes"><name-alternatives><name name-style="eastern" xml:lang="ru"><surname>Чипига</surname><given-names>Л. А.</given-names></name><name name-style="western" xml:lang="en"><surname>Chipiga</surname><given-names>L. A.</given-names></name></name-alternatives><bio xml:lang="ru"><p>Лариса Александровна Чипига, кандидат технических наук, научный сотрудник лаборатории радиационной ги­гиены медицинских организаций; научный сотрудник; доцент кафедры ядерной медицины и радиационных технологий</p><p>Санкт-Петербург</p></bio><bio xml:lang="en"><p>Larisa A. Chipiga, Ph.D., research fellow; docent</p><p>Saint-Petersburg</p></bio><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff-2"/></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes"><name-alternatives><name name-style="eastern" xml:lang="ru"><surname>Пивень</surname><given-names>П. А.</given-names></name><name name-style="western" xml:lang="en"><surname>Piven</surname><given-names>P. A.</given-names></name></name-alternatives><bio xml:lang="ru"><p>Павел Алексеевич Пивень, студент Высшей инженерно-физической школы</p><p>Санкт-Петербург</p></bio><bio xml:lang="en"><p>Pavel A. Piven, Student, Higher Engineering Physics School</p><p>Saint-Petersburg</p></bio><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff-3"/></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes"><name-alternatives><name name-style="eastern" xml:lang="ru"><surname>Труфанов</surname><given-names>Г. Е.</given-names></name><name name-style="western" xml:lang="en"><surname>Trufanov</surname><given-names>G. E.</given-names></name></name-alternatives><bio xml:lang="ru"><p>Геннадий Евгеньевич Труфанов, доктор медицинских наук, профессор, главный научный сотрудник Научно­-исследовательского отдела, заведующий кафедрой лучевой диагностики и медицинской визуализации Института медицинского образования</p><p>Санкт-Петербург</p></bio><bio xml:lang="en"><p>Gennady E. Trufanov, Doctor of Medical Sciences, Professor, Leading Researcher of the Research Institute of Radiation Diagnostics, Head of the Department of Radiation Diagnostics and Medical Imaging, Institute of Medical Education</p><p>Saint-Petersburg</p></bio><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff-4"/></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes"><name-alternatives><name name-style="eastern" xml:lang="ru"><surname>Беркович</surname><given-names>Г. В.</given-names></name><name name-style="western" xml:lang="en"><surname>Berkovich</surname><given-names>G. V.</given-names></name></name-alternatives><bio xml:lang="ru"><p>Глеб Владимирович Беркович, заведующий кабинетом компьютерной томографии</p><p>Санкт-Петербург</p></bio><bio xml:lang="en"><p>Gleb V. Berkovich, Head of the Computed Tomography department</p><p>Saint-Petersburg</p></bio><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff-4"/></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes"><name-alternatives><name name-style="eastern" xml:lang="ru"><surname>Мащенко</surname><given-names>И. А.</given-names></name><name name-style="western" xml:lang="en"><surname>Mashchenko</surname><given-names>I. A.</given-names></name></name-alternatives><bio xml:lang="ru"><p>Ирина Александровна Мащенко, кандидат медицинских наук, заведующий группой — ведущий научный сотрудник научно-исследовательской группы лучевых методов исследования в перинатологии и педиатрии, ассистент кафедры лучевой диагностики и медицинской визуализации Института медицинского образования</p><p>Санкт-Петербург</p></bio><bio xml:lang="en"><p>Irina A. Mashchenko, PhD, Head of the Group - Leading Researcher of the Research Institute of Radiation Research in Perinatology and Pediatrics, Assistant of the Department of Radiation Diagnostics and Medical Imaging, Institute of Medical Education</p><p>Saint-Petersburg</p></bio><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff-4"/></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes"><name-alternatives><name name-style="eastern" xml:lang="ru"><surname>Дружинина</surname><given-names>П. С.</given-names></name><name name-style="western" xml:lang="en"><surname>Druzhinina</surname><given-names>P. S.</given-names></name></name-alternatives><bio xml:lang="ru"><p>Полина Сергеевна Дружинина, младший научный сотрудник, лаборатория радиационной гигиены медицинских организаций</p><p>Санкт-Петербург</p></bio><bio xml:lang="en"><p>Polina S. Druzhinina, junior researcher, Medical Protection Laboratory</p><p>Saint-Petersburg</p></bio><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff-5"/></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes"><name-alternatives><name name-style="eastern" xml:lang="ru"><surname>Пузырев</surname><given-names>В. Г.</given-names></name><name name-style="western" xml:lang="en"><surname>Puzyrev</surname><given-names>V. G.</given-names></name></name-alternatives><bio xml:lang="ru"><p>Виктор Геннадьевич Пузырев, кандидат медицинских наук, доцент, заведующий кафедрой общей гигиены</p><p>Санкт-Петербург</p></bio><bio xml:lang="en"><p>Viktor G. Puzyrev, MD, Ph.D., Assistant Professor, the Head of the Department of General Hygiene</p><p>Saint-Petersburg</p></bio><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff-6"/></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes"><name-alternatives><name name-style="eastern" xml:lang="ru"><surname>Рыжов</surname><given-names>С. А.</given-names></name><name name-style="western" xml:lang="en"><surname>Ryzhov</surname><given-names>S. A.</given-names></name></name-alternatives><bio xml:lang="ru"><p>Сергей Анатольевич Рыжов, вице-президент Ассоциации медицинских физиков России, научный сотрудник; начальник отдела радиационной безопасности и медицинской физики</p><p>Москва</p></bio><bio xml:lang="en"><p>Sergey A. Ryzhov, vice president of the Association of Medical Physicists in Russia, research fellow; head of the radiation safety and medical physics department</p><p>Moscow</p><p> </p></bio><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff-7"/></contrib></contrib-group><aff-alternatives id="aff-1"><aff xml:lang="ru"><institution>Санкт-Петербургский научно-исследовательский институт радиационной гигиены имени профессора П. В. Рамзаева, Федеральная служба по надзору в сфере защиты прав потребителей и благополучия человека; Санкт-Петербургский государственный педиатрический медицинский университет</institution><country>Россия</country></aff><aff xml:lang="en"><institution>Saint-Petersburg Research Institute of Radiation Hygiene after Professor P. V. Ramzaev, Federal Service for Surveillance on Consumer Rights Protection and Human Well-Being; Saint-Petersburg State Pediatric Medical University</institution><country>Russian Federation</country></aff></aff-alternatives><aff-alternatives id="aff-2"><aff xml:lang="ru"><institution>Санкт-Петербургский научно-исследовательский институт радиационной гигиены имени профессора П. В. Рамзаева, Федеральная служба по надзору в сфере защиты прав потребителей и благополучия человека; Российский научный центр радиологии и хирургических технологий имени академика A. M. Гранова; Национальный медицинский исследовательский центр им. В. А. Алмазова</institution><country>Россия</country></aff><aff xml:lang="en"><institution>Saint-Petersburg Research Institute of Radiation Hygiene after Professor P. V. Ramzaev, Federal Service for Surveillance on Consumer Rights Protection and Human Well-Being; Granov Russian Research Center of Radiology and Surgical Technologies; Almazov National Medical Research Centre</institution><country>Russian Federation</country></aff></aff-alternatives><aff-alternatives id="aff-3"><aff xml:lang="ru"><institution>Санкт-Петербургский политехнический университет Петра Великого</institution><country>Россия</country></aff><aff xml:lang="en"><institution>Peter the Great Saint-Petersburg Polytechnic University</institution><country>Russian Federation</country></aff></aff-alternatives><aff-alternatives id="aff-4"><aff xml:lang="ru"><institution>Национальный медицинский исследовательский центр им. В. А. Алмазова</institution><country>Россия</country></aff><aff xml:lang="en"><institution>Almazov National Medical Research Centre</institution><country>Russian Federation</country></aff></aff-alternatives><aff-alternatives id="aff-5"><aff xml:lang="ru"><institution>Санкт-Петербургский научно-исследовательский институт радиационной гигиены имени профессора П. В. Рамзаева, Федеральная служба по надзору в сфере защиты прав потребителей и благополучия человека</institution><country>Россия</country></aff><aff xml:lang="en"><institution>Saint-Petersburg Research Institute of Radiation Hygiene after Professor P. V. Ramzaev, Federal Service for Surveillance on Consumer Rights Protection and Human Well-Being</institution><country>Russian Federation</country></aff></aff-alternatives><aff-alternatives id="aff-6"><aff xml:lang="ru"><institution>Санкт-Петербургский государственный педиатрический медицинский университет</institution><country>Россия</country></aff><aff xml:lang="en"><institution>Saint-Petersburg State Pediatric Medical University</institution><country>Russian Federation</country></aff></aff-alternatives><aff-alternatives id="aff-7"><aff xml:lang="ru"><institution>Научно-практический клинический центр диагностики и телемедицинских технологий; Национальный медицинский исследовательский центр детской гематологии, онкологии и иммунологии имени Дмитрия Рогачева</institution><country>Россия</country></aff><aff xml:lang="en"><institution>Research and Practice Center of Diagnostics and Telemedicine Technologies; Dmitry Rogachev National Medical Research Center of Pediatric Hematology, Oncology and Immunology</institution><country>Russian Federation</country></aff></aff-alternatives><pub-date pub-type="collection"><year>2021</year></pub-date><pub-date pub-type="epub"><day>09</day><month>10</month><year>2021</year></pub-date><volume>14</volume><issue>3</issue><fpage>126</fpage><lpage>135</lpage><permissions><copyright-statement>Copyright &amp;#x00A9; Водоватов А.В., Чипига Л.А., Пивень П.А., Труфанов Г.Е., Беркович Г.В., Мащенко И.А., Дружинина П.С., Пузырев В.Г., Рыжов С.А., 2021</copyright-statement><copyright-year>2021</copyright-year><copyright-holder xml:lang="ru">Водоватов А.В., Чипига Л.А., Пивень П.А., Труфанов Г.Е., Беркович Г.В., Мащенко И.А., Дружинина П.С., Пузырев В.Г., Рыжов С.А.</copyright-holder><copyright-holder xml:lang="en">Vodovatov A.V., Chipiga L.A., Piven P.A., Trufanov G.E., Berkovich G.V., Mashchenko I.A., Druzhinina P.S., Puzyrev V.G., Ryzhov S.A.</copyright-holder><license xml:lang="ru" license-type="creative-commons-attribution" xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/" xlink:type="simple"><license-p>Данная работа распространяется под лицензией Creative Commons Attribution 4.0.</license-p></license><license xml:lang="en" license-type="creative-commons-attribution" xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/" xlink:type="simple"><license-p>This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.</license-p></license></permissions><self-uri xlink:href="https://www.radhyg.ru/jour/article/view/825">https://www.radhyg.ru/jour/article/view/825</self-uri><abstract><p>В Российской Федерации, как и в остальных развитых странах мира, ежегодно растет число и доля высокодозовых методов лучевой диагностики, в частности, компьютерной томографии. Мак­симальный рост числа КТ-исследований в России наблюдался в 2020 г. за счет массированного при­менения данного метода для диагностики новой коронавирусной инфекции COVID-19. Его примене­ние для исследования органов грудной клетки у беременных пациенток связано с рядом нерешенных вопросов. Общепринятым подходом по обеспечению радиационной защиты беременных пациенток является оценка поглощенной дозы в плоде после каждого рентгенорадиологического исследования. К сожалению, на текущий момент утвержденные методики оценки поглощенной дозы в плоде в отечественной практике отсутствуют. Целью данного исследования являлась оценка дозы облучения плода у беременных женщин, проходящих КТ-исследование органов грудной клетки в связи с диагностикой новой коронавирусной инфекции COVID-19, с целью оценки возможности развития пороговых эффектов у плода. Для этого были собраны параметры отечественных и зарубежных протоколов КТ-сканирования органов грудной клетки и оценены поглощенная доза в матке беременной женщины и эффективная доза у плода. Параметры зарубежных протоколов КТ-сканирования органов грудной клетки для беременных были определены посредством мета-анализа литературных источников; отечественных — путем сбора данных на базе КТ-отделений в медицинских организациях Санкт-Петербурга. На основании параметров протоколов КТ-сканирования органов грудной клетки был выполнен расчет поглощенной дозы в матке пациентки и эффективной дозы у плода с использованием компьютерной программы NCICT 3.0 для сроков беременности 8, 10, 15, 20, 25, 30, 35 и 38 недель. Результаты расчетов показывают, что поглощенные дозы в матке матери и эффек­тивные дозы у плода достоверно не отличаются друг от друга для всех исследованных сроков беременности. Максимальные значения доз, определенные для обследованных протоколов сканирования, находятся примерно на уровне в 0,5мГр (мЗв) для сроков 8—25 недель, 0,6мГр (мЗв) для 30-й недели, 1,4 мГр (мЗв) для 35-й недели, и 2,7мГр (мЗв) для 38-й недели. Результаты исследования показали, что порог развития детерминированных эффектов в плоде, принимаемый равным 100 мГр, прак­тически недостижим даже при проведении многократных (вплоть до 10—15 раз) КТ-сканирований органов грудной клетки. Таким образом, проведение КТ-сканирования органов грудной клетки в качестве метода выбора диагностики и стадирования COVID-19 для беременных женщин не будет связано с развитием детерминированных эффектов у плода.</p></abstract><trans-abstract xml:lang="en"><p>The number and contribution of high dose imaging modalities, computed tomography in particular, is rapidly increasing both in the 'Russian Federation and other developed countries. Maximal increase in the number of computed tomography examinations in Russia was observed in 2020 due to the full-scale application of this imaging modality for the diagnostics of the novel coronavirus infection COVID-19. The use of computed tomography for the examination of the chest for the pregnant women is associated with several issues. An internationally accepted approach for the provision of the radiation safety of the pregnant patients is the assessment of the absorbed dose in the fetus after each X-ray examination. However, there are no existingn approved methods for the assessment of the absorbed dose in the fetus in the Russian Federation. The aim of the current study was to assess the doses in the fetus for the pregnant women undergoing computed tomography of the chest due to the COVID-19 and to estimate the probability of the development of the deterministic effects for the fetus. The study was based on the collection of the parameter of Russian and international computed tomography protocols. Parameters of the international computed tomography protocols were collected viameta-analysis of the existing publications; Russian protocols — via data collection in computed tomography departments in St-Petersburg hospitals. Absorbed dose in the uterus of the female patient and effective dose for the fetus were calculated using NCICT 3.0 software for 8, 10, 15, 20, 25, 30, 35 and 38 weeks of pregnancy. The results of the calculations indicate the lack of significant differences between absorbed doses in the uterus and effective doses for the fetus for all stages of pregnancy. Maximal doses for the selected computed tomog­ raphy protocols were in the range of 0.5 mGy (mSv) for 8-25 weeks, 0.6 mGy (mSv) for 30 week, 1.4 mGy (mSv) for 35 week and 2.7 mGy (mSv) for 38 week. The threshold for the development of the deterministic effects equal to 100 mGy cannot be exceeded even for repeated (10-15) computed tomography chest scans. Hence, the use of computed tomography as the primary method of COVID-19 diagnostics and staging will not be associated with the development of deterministic effects in the fetus.</p></trans-abstract><kwd-group xml:lang="ru"><kwd>компьютерная томография</kwd><kwd>поглощенные дозы в плоде</kwd><kwd>COVID-19</kwd><kwd>новая коронавирусная инфекция</kwd></kwd-group><kwd-group xml:lang="en"><kwd>computed tomography</kwd><kwd>Absorbed dose in the fetus</kwd><kwd>COVID-19</kwd><kwd>novel coronavirus infection</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><back><ref-list><title>References</title><ref id="cit1"><label>1</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Elicker B. M. What Is the Performance and Role of CT in Suspected COVID-19 Infection? // Radiology. 2021. Vol. 289, No 2. P. 109-111. URL: https://pubs.rsna.org/doi/pdf/10.1148/radiol.20202040130 (Дата обращения: 28.07.2021).</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Elicker B. M. What Is the Performance and Role of CT in Suspected COVID-19 Infection? Radiology. 2021;289(2): 109-111. Available on: https://pubs.rsna.org/doi/pdf/10.1148/radiol.20202040130 (Accessed: 28.07.2021)</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit2"><label>2</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Dehan L., Lin L., Xin W., et al. Pregnancy and Perinatal Outcomes of Women with Coronavirus Disease (COVID-19) Pneumonia: A Preliminary Analysis // American Journal of Roentgenology. 2020. P. 127-132.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Dehan L., Lin L., Xin W., et al. Pregnancy and Perinatal Outcomes of Women with Coronavirus Disease (COVID-19) Pneumonia: A Preliminary Analysis. American Journal of Roentgenology. 2020; 127-132.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit3"><label>3</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Водоватов А. В., Романович И. К., Историк О. А., и др. Предварительная оценка изменения структуры и коллективной дозы от КТ-исследований за период март-июнь 2020 г в связи с диагностикой COVID-19 В Российской Федерации // COVID-19 preprints. 2020. 15 p.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Vodovatov A. V., Romanovich I. K., Istorik O. A., Eremina L. A., Morozov S. P., Ryzhov S. A., et al. PREPRINT - Preliminary assessment of structure and collective dose from CT ex­aminations related to COVID-19 diagnostics in the Russian Federation in March. COVID-19 preprints-June 2020; 2020. 15. (In Russian)</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit4"><label>4</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Vodovatov A. V., Romanovich I. K., Istorik O. A., et al. PREPRINT - Preliminary assessment of structure and collective dose from CT examinations related to COVID-19 diagnostics in the Russian Federation in March // MedRxiv - the preprint server for health sciences - June 2020. 13 p. https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.08.25.20181396</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Vodovatov A. V., Romanovich I. K., Istorik O. A., Eremina L. A., Morozov S. P., Ryzhov S. A., et al. PREPRINT - Preliminary assessment of structure and collective dose from CT examinations related to COVID-19 diagnostics in the Russian Federation in March. MedRxiv - the preprint server for health sciences. June 2020; 2020. 13 p. https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.08.25.20181396</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit5"><label>5</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Doll R., Wakeford R. Risk of childhood cancer from fetal irradiation // British Journal of Radiology. 1997. 70. P. 130-139.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Doll R., Wakeford R. Risk of childhood cancer from fetal irradiation. British Journal of Radiology. 1997; 70: 130-139.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit6"><label>6</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation. Guidelines. Organization of medical care for pregnant women, women in labor, postpartum women and newborns with a new coronavirus infection COVID-19. Version 1 (04/24/2020). 2020. 143 p.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation. Guidelines. Organization of medical care for pregnant women, women in labor, postpartum women and newborns with a new coronavirus infection COVID-19. Version 1 (04/24/2020); 2020. 143 p.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit7"><label>7</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation. Guidelines. Prevention, diagnostics and treatment of new coronavirus infection (COVID-19). Version 10 (08.02.2021). 2021.261 p.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation. Guidelines. Prevention, diagnostics and treatment of new coronavirus infection (COVID-19). Version 10 (08.02.2021); 2021. 261 p.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit8"><label>8</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">American College of Radiology official website. Appropriateness-Criteria. On-Line resource. Available on: https://www.acr.org/Clinical-Resources/ACR-Appropriateness-Criteria (Дата обращения: 28.07.2021).</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">American College of Radiology. Official website. Appropriateness-Criteria. On-Line resource. Available on: https://www.acr.org/Clinical-Resources/ACR-Appropriateness-Criteria (Accessed: 28.07.2021).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit9"><label>9</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">iRefer official website - On-Line resource - Available on: https://www.irefer.org.uk/ (Дата обращения: 28.07.2021).</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">iRefer official website. Available on: https://www.irefer.org.uk/ (Accessed: 28.07.2021).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit10"><label>10</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">ICRP Pregnancy and Medical Radiation/ICRP // Annals of the ICRP. Publication 84. 2000. Vol. 30, № 1.62 p.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">ICRP. Pregnancy and Medical Radiation. Annals of the ICRP. Publication 84. 2000;30(1): 62.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit11"><label>11</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Damilakis J., Perisinakis K., Tzedakis A., et al. Radiation Dose to the Conceptus from Multidetector CT during Early Gestation: A Method That Allows for Variations in Maternal Body Size and Conceptus Position // Radiology. 2010. Vol. 257. № 2. 483-489 p.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Damilakis J., Perisinakis K., Tzedakis A., Papadakis A., Karantanas A. Radiation Dose to the Conceptus from Multidetector CT during Early Gestation: A Method That Allows for Variations in Maternal Body Size and Conceptus Position. Radiology. 2010;257(2): 483-489.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit12"><label>12</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">The Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Radiologists. Diagnostic Radiology and Pregnancy. Version 2.0. 2017. 16 p.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">The Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Radiologists. Diagnostic Radiology and Pregnancy. Version 2.0; 2017. 16 p.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit13"><label>13</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Tremblay E., Therasse E., Thomassin-Naggara I., Trop I., et al. Quality Initiatives Guidelines for Use of Medical Imaging during Pregnancy and Lactation // Radiographics. 2012. Vol. 32, No 3. P 897-911. doi: 10.1148/rg.323115120</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Tremblay E., Therasse E., Thomassin-Naggara I., Trop I. Quality Initiatives Guidelines for Use of Medical Imaging dur­ing Pregnancy and Lactation. Radiographics. 2012;32(3): 897-911. doi: 10.1148/rg.323115120</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit14"><label>14</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">ICRP. Recommendations International Commission on Radiation Protection 2007. Publication ICRP No. 103. Transl. from English / Ed. M. F. M. Kiselev and N. K. Shandala. M., Ed. LLC PKF «Alana», 2009. 312 p.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">ICRP. Recommendations International Commission on Radiation Protection 2007. Publication ICRP No. 103. Transl. from English. Ed. M. F. Kiselev and N. K. Shandala. Moscow: Ed. LLC PKF «Alana»; 2009. 312 p.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit15"><label>15</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Международное Агентство по Атомной Энергии. Радиационная Защита и Безопасность Источников Излучения: Международные Основные Нормы Безопасности. Общие требования безопасности. Серия норм МАГАТЭ по безопасности, № GSR Part 3. Вена: МАГАТЭ, 2015. 250 с.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">International Atomic Energy Agency. Radiation Protection and Safety of Radiation Sources: International Basic Safety Standards. General safety requirements. IAEA Safety Standards Series No. GSR Part 3. Vienna: IAEA; 2015. 250. (In Russian)</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit16"><label>16</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">International Atomic Energy Agency. Radiation Protection and Safety in Medical Uses of Ionizing Radiation. Specific Safety Guide, №SSG-46. Vienna: IAEA, 2018. 318 p.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">International Atomic Energy Agency. Radiation Protection and Safety in Medical Uses of Ionizing Radiation. Specific Safety Guide, №SSG-46. Vienna: IAEA; 2018. 318.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit17"><label>17</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Angel E., Wellnitz C. V., Goodsitt M. M., et al. Radiation dose to the fetus for pregnant patients undergoing multidetector CT imaging: Monte Carlo simulations estimating fetal dose for a range of gestational age and patient size // Radiology. 2008. Vol. 249, No 1. P. 220-7. DOI:10.1148/radiol.2491071665</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Angel E., Wellnitz C. V., Goodsitt M. M., et al. Radiation dose to the fetus for pregnant patients undergoing multidetector CT imaging: Monte Carlo simulations estimating fetal dose for a range of gestational age and patient size. Radiology. 2008;249(1): 220-7. DOI:10.1148/radiol.2491071665</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit18"><label>18</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Huanhuan L., Fang L., Jining L., et al. Clinical and CT imag­ing features of the COVID-19 pneumonia: Focus on pregnant women and children // Journal of Infection. 2020. P. 7 - 13.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Huanhuan L., Fang L., Jining L., et al. Clinical and CT imaging features of the COVID-19 pneumonia: Focus on pregnant women and children. Journal of Infection. 2020: 7 - 13.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit19"><label>19</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Winer-Muram H.T., Boone J. M., Brown H. L., et al. Pulmonary embolism in pregnant patients: fetal radiation dose with helical CT // Radiology. 2002. P. 487-492.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Winer-Muram H. T., Boone J. M., Brown H. L., et al. Pulmonary embolism in pregnant patients: fetal radiation dose with helical CT. Radiology. 2002: 487-492.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit20"><label>20</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Shahir K., Goodman L. R., Tali A., et al. Pulmonary Embolism in Pregnancy: CT Pulmonary Angiography Versus Perfusion Scanning // American Journal of Roentgenology. 2010. Vol. 195. P. 214-220.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Shahir K., Goodman L. R., Tali A., et al. Pulmonary Embolism in Pregnancy: CT Pulmonary Angiography Versus Perfusion Scanning. American Journal of Roentgenology. 2010;195: 214-220.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit21"><label>21</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Lee C., Kim K. P, Bolch W. E., et al. NCICT: a compu­tational solution to estimate organ doses for pediatric and adult patients undergoing CT scans // Journal of Radiology Protection. 2015. Vol. 35, No 4. P. 891-909. doi: 10.1088/0952-4746/35/4/891</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Lee C., Kim K. P., Bolch W. E., Moroz B. E., Folio L. NCICT: a computational solution to estimate organ doses for pedi­atric and adult patients undergoing CT scans. Journal of Radiology Protection. 2015;35(4): 891-909. doi: 10.1088/0952-4746/35/4/891</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit22"><label>22</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Saltybaeva N., Platon A., Poletti P.-A., et al. Radiation Dose to the Fetus From Computed Tomography of Pregnant Patients—Development and Validation of a Web-Based Tool // Investigative Radiology. 2020. Vol. 55, No 12. P. 762-768. https://www.fetaldose.org/calculator doi:10.1097/rli.0000000000000701</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Saltybaeva N., Platon A., Poletti P. A., Hinzpeter R., Merce M. S., Alkadhi H.. Radiation Dose to the Fetus from Computed Tomography of Pregnant Patients—Development and Validation of a Web-Based Tool. Investigative Radiology. 2020;55(12): 762-768. Available on: https ://www. fetal-dose.org/calculator. doi: 10.1097/rli.0000000000000701 (Accessed: 28.07.2021).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit23"><label>23</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Chipiga L., Golikov V., Vodovatov A., Bernhardsson Ch. Comparison of Organ Absorbed Doses in Whole-Body Computed Tomography Scans of Paediatric and Adult Patient Models Estimated by Different Methods // Radiation Protection Dosimetry. 2021. URL: https://doi.org/10.1093/rpd/ncab086 (Дата обращения: 28.07.2021).</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Chipiga L., Golikov V., Vodovatov A., Bernhardsson Ch. Comparison of Organ Absorbed Doses in Whole-Body Computed Tomography Scans of Paediatric and Adult Patient Models Estimated by Different Methods. Radiation Protection Dosimetry. 2021. Online resource. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1093/rpd/ncab086 (Accessed: 28.07.2021).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit24"><label>24</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Chipiga L. A. A comparison of computational methods for estimation of effective and organ doses to the patients from CT examination // Radiatsionnaya Gygiena = Radiation Hygiene. 2017. Vol. 10, No 1. P. 56-64. (In Russian.) https://doi.org/10.21514/1998-426X-2017-10-1-56-64</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Chipiga L. A. A comparison of computational methods for estimation of effective and organ doses to the patients from CT examination. Radiatsionnaya Gygiena = Radiation Hygiene. 2017; 10(1): 56-64. (In Russian) https://doi.org/10.21514/1998-426X-2017-10-1-56-64</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit25"><label>25</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Maynard M. R., Long N. S., Moawad N. S., et al. The UF Family of hybrid phantoms of the pregnant female for computational radiation dosimetry // Physics in Medicine and Biology. 2014. Vol. 59, No 15: 4325-4343. doi:10.1088/0031-9155/59/15/4325</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Maynard M. R., Long N. S., Moawad N. S., Shifrin R. Y. Geyer A. M., Fong G., et al. The UF Family of hybrid phantoms of the pregnant female for computational radiation dosimetry. Physics in Medicine and Biology. 2014;59(15): 4325-4343. doi:10.1088/0031-9155/59/15/4325</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit26"><label>26</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Choonsik Lee. NCICT: user manual. 6p.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Choonsik Lee. NCICT: user manual. 6 p.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit27"><label>27</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Huda W., Randazzo W., Tipnis S., et al. Embryo Dose Estimates in Body CT // American Journal of Radology. 2010. Vol. 194. P. 874-880.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Huda W., Randazzo W., Tipnis S., Frey G. D., Mah E., et al. Embryo Dose Estimates in Body CT. American Journal of Radiology. 2010; 194: 874-880.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit28"><label>28</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Matsunaga Yu., Kawaguchi A., Kobayashi M., et al. Fetal dose conversion factor for fetal computed tomography examina­tions: A mathematical phantom study // Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics. 2017. Vol. 18, No 5. P. 330-335.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Matsunaga Yu., Kawaguchi A., Kobayashi M., Suzuki Sh., Asada Ya., Ito K., et al. Fetal dose conversion factor for fetal computed tomography examinations: A mathematical phantom study. Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics. 2017;18(5): 330-335.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit29"><label>29</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">ACR. ACR-SPR practice parameter for imaging pregnant or potentially pregnant adolescents and women with ionizing ra­diation. - 2018. - 23 p. On-Line resource - URL: https://www.acr.org/-/media/acr/files/practice-parameters/pregnant-pts.pdf (Дата обращения: 28.07.2021)</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">ACR. ACR-SPR practice parameter for imaging pregnant or potentially pregnant adolescents and women with ionizing radiation. 2018. 23 p. Available on: https://www.acr.org/-/media/acr/files/practice-parameters/pregnant-pts.pdf (Accessed: 28.07.2021).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit30"><label>30</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Xu X. G., Taranenko V., Zhang J., et al. A boundary-represen­tation method for designing whole-body radiation dosimetry models: pregnant females at the ends of three gestational periods—RPI-P3, -P6 and -P9 // Physics in Medicine and Biology. 2007. Vol. 52. P. 7023-7044.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Xu X. G, Taranenko V., Zhang J., et al. A boundary-representation method for designing whole-body radiation dosimetry models: pregnant females at the ends of three gestational periods—RPI-P3, -P6 and -P9. Physics in Medicine and Biology. 2007;52: 7023-7044.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit31"><label>31</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Stamm G., Nagel H. D. CT-Expo V 2.3. A Tool for Dose Evaluation in Computed Tomography. User’s Guide, 2014. 59p.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Stamm G., Nagel H. D. CT-Expo V 2.3. A Tool for Dose Evaluation in Computed Tomography. User’s Guide; 2014. 59 p.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit32"><label>32</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Lewis M. A., Edyvean S., Sassi S. A., et al. Estimating patient dose on current CT scanners: Results of the ImPACT CT dose survey // Radiations Magazine. 2000. Vol. 26. P. 17-18.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Lewis M. A., Edyvean S., Sassi S. A., et al. Estimating patient dose on current CT scanners: Results of the ImPACT CT dose survey. Radiations Magazine. 2000; 26: 17-18.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit33"><label>33</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Sahbaee P., Segars W. P., Samei E., et al. Patient-based estimation of organ dose for a population of 58 adult patients across 13 protocol categories // Medical Physics. 2014. Vol. 41, № 7. P. 072104-1- 072104-12.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Sahbaee P., Segars W. P., Samei E., et al. Patient-based estimation of organ dose for a population of 58 adult patients across 13 protocol categories. Medical Physics. 2014;41(7): 072104-1- 072104-12.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref></ref-list><fn-group><fn fn-type="conflict"><p>The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest present.</p></fn></fn-group></back></article>
