Preview

Radiatsionnaya Gygiena = Radiation Hygiene

Advanced search

The possibility of using the DKS-AT1123 dosimeter for radiation monitoring of medical electron accelerators with the energy of more than 10 MeV

https://doi.org/10.21514/1998-426X-2024-17-2-38-45

Abstract

In  the  Russian  Federation,  there  is  a  constant  increase  in  the  number  of  radiation  medical  installations  with electron accelerators. Over the past 4 years, their number has increased 2.5 times. These installations contain pulsed electron accelerators that generate pulsed bremsstrahlung radiation with a maximum energy from 6 to 21 MeV. Currently, there are no devices designed for dosimetry of the pulsed photon radiation with energy of more than 10 MeV in the state register of measuring instruments of the Russian Federation. The most widely used radiation monitoring device for pulsed electron accelerators is the DKS-AT1123 X-ray and gamma radiation dosimeter designed for dosimetry of pulsed bremsstrahlung radiation with an energy of up to 10 MeV. The purpose of this work is to evaluate the possibility of using this device for dosimetry of pulsed bremsstrahlung radiation with a maximum energy of up to 20 MeV. The authors calculated the energy spectra of bremsstrahlung radiation for a point source with a maximum energy of 20 MeV behind flat concrete screens with a thickness of 1 m, 2 m and 3 m by the Monte Carlo method using the GEANT4 calculation program. The energy dependence of the registration efficiency of the DKS-AT1123 dosimeter was extrapolated to the energy range of 10–50 MeV in the kerma-approximation without taking into account the energy transfer by secondary electrons. It was assumed that it corresponds to the energy dependence of the total mass attenuation coefficient for the absorbed energy of gamma quanta in water. Using conversion coefficients for converting the fluence of monoenergetic photons into the effective dose rate at an anterior-posterior radiation incidence on the human body, real dose rates were calculated, and using the energy dependence of the dosimeter readings, the predicted results of measuring the unit dose rate with the DKS-AT1123 dosimeter behind a concrete protection with a thickness of 1, 2 and 3 m were obtained. It is shown that the maximum expected underestimation of the measurement results will not exceed 40% and practically does not depend on the thickness of the concrete shield in the thickness range from 1 to 3 m. To account for this underestimation, it is necessary to use the value of additional measurement error due to the energy dependence of the sensitivity of this device for the photon radiation energy of more than 10 MeV, equal to 70%. This makes it possible to use the measurement results obtained using this dosimeter to adequately characterize the state of radiation safety during operation of pulsed electron accelerators with a maximum energy of up to 20 MeV. It is possible to use a correction factor to the measurement results equal to 1.63 ±0.04 to compensate for this underestimation. The proposed approach can be used to create a methodology for using this dosimeter for radiation monitoring of medical electron accelerators with the energy of up to 20 MeV, if there are correction factors for radiation protection configurations and radiation energies encountered in practice.

About the Authors

A. N. Barkovsky
Saint-Petersburg  Research   Institute   of   Radiation  Hygiene  after   Professor   P.V.   Ramzaev,  Federal  Service  for  Surveillance of Consumer Rights Protection and  Human Wellbeing
Russian Federation

Anatoly N. Barkovsky – Head of the Federal Radiological Center

Mira Str., 8, Saint-Petersburg, 197101



S. A. Ogorodnikov
Limited liability company  «Laboratory Scantronic»
Russian Federation

Sergey A. Ogorodnikov – General Director

Saint-Petersburg



References

1. Shevkun IG, Stepanov VS, Romanovich IK, Barkovsky AN, Baryshkov NK, Bratilova AA, et al. Results of radiation-hygienic passportization in the subjects of the Russian Federation for 2017 (Radiation-hygienic passport of the Russian Federation). Moscow: Federal Service for Supervision of Consumer Rights Protection and Human Well-Being; 2018. 128 p. (In Russian).

2. Shevkun IG, Stepanov VS, Romanovich IK, Barkovsky AN, Baryshkov NK, Bratilova AA, et al. Results of radiation-hygienic passportization in the subjects of the Russian Federation for 2021 (Radiation-hygienic passport of the Russian Federation). Moscow: Federal Service for Supervision of Consumer Rights Protection and Human Well-Being; 2022. 125 p. (In Russian).

3. Martinuk U.N. The State Register of Measuring Instruments. Part 2. General-purpose, pulse and special dosimeters. ANRI = ANRI. 2020;4(103):3-13. (In Russian).

4. Description of the type of measuring instrument. X-ray and gamma radiation dosimeters DKS-AT1121, DKS-AT1123. Appendix to Certificate No. 75466 on type approval of measuring instruments. (In Russian).

5. Description of the type of measuring instrument. RUMION dosimeters. Appendix to Certificate No. 64658 on type approval of measuring instruments. (In Russian).

6. Description of the type of measuring instrument. Dosimeters-radiometers DKS-96. Appendix to Certificate No. 43717 on type approval of measuring instruments. (In Russian).

7. Titov NV. The possibility of using dosimeters with a Geiger-Muller counter for dosimetry of pulsed radiation. Radiatsionnaya Gygiena = Radiation hygiene. 2019;12(2): 76-80. (In Russian).

8. X-ray and gamma radiation dosimeters DKS-AT1121, DKS-AT1121A, DKS-AT1123, DKS-AT1123A. User Manual. 69 p. (In Russian).

9. Mordasov NG, Ivaschenko DM, Chlenov AM, Astakhov AA. Modeling of methods for express determination of the energy spectrum of the bremsstrahlung radiation of electron accelerators. Zhurnal tekhnicheskoy fiziki = Journal of Technical Physics. 2004;74(9): 108-115. (In Russian).

10. Abibullaev NA, Begimkulov HH, Salihbaev US. Energy spectra and angular distribution of the bremsstrahlung radiation emitted from a thick tungsten target by electrons with an energy of 11.8 MeV. Atomnaya energiya = Atomic Energy. 2002;92(3): 247-249. (In Russian).

11. Nurlybaev K, Martinyuk UN, Karakash AI, Sinnikov LL, Lykova EN, Galjautdinova ZZ, et al. Radiation safety in radiation therapy using electron accelerators. ANRI = ANRI. 2014;1: 15-21. (In Russian).

12. Abibullaev NA, Salikhbaev US. Energy spectra and angular distributions of the bremsstrahlung radiation emitted by electrons with an energy of 20 MeV from a thick tungsten target. Izvestiya RAN = Izvestiya RAS . 2000;64(1): 152-160. (In Russian).

13. Sakharov VK. Spectra of bremsstrahlung radiation and photoneutrons from a tungsten target of an electron accelerator with an energy of 5 – 90 MeV. Atomnaya energiya = Atomic Energy. 2016;120(4): 228-231. (In Russian).

14. Allison J, Amako K, Apostolakis J, Araújo H, Dubois PA, Asaiet M, et al. Geant4 developments and applications. IEEE Transactions on Nuclear Science. 2006;53(1): 270-278.

15. Storm E, Israel H. Cross sections of the interaction of gamma radiation (for energies 0.001 – 100 MeV and elements from 1 to 100) Handbook. Translated from English by Candidates of Technical Sciences VA Klimanov, ED Chistova. Moscow: Atomizdat; 1973. 256 p. (In Russian).

16. ICRP Publication 116. Conversion Coefficients for Radiological Protection Quantities for External Radiation Exposures. Annals of the ICRP . 2010;40(2-5): 1-257. DOI: 10.1016/j.icrp.2011.10.001.


Review

For citations:


Barkovsky A.N., Ogorodnikov S.A. The possibility of using the DKS-AT1123 dosimeter for radiation monitoring of medical electron accelerators with the energy of more than 10 MeV. Radiatsionnaya Gygiena = Radiation Hygiene. 2024;17(2):38-45. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.21514/1998-426X-2024-17-2-38-45

Views: 417


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 1998-426X (Print)
ISSN 2409-9082 (Online)