About the necessary thickness of stationary shield in X-ray dental rooms
https://doi.org/10.21514/1998-426X-2024-17-2-46-52
Abstract
In the paper, based on the analysis of scientific information regarding the parameters and characteris-tics of radiation fields for three dental X-ray procedures (intraoral radiographs, panoramic radiographs on orthopantomographs and computed tomography), the required thickness of stationary shields for rooms with different X-ray equipment is calculated. It has been shown that in most cases, in rooms where intraoral and panoramic radiographs are taken, conventional 20 mm thick plasterboard interior room partitions provide the necessary protection to comply with the dose limit for the population in the adjacent room. For the rooms where dental examinations are carried out using computed tomographs additional lead shield up to 1.5 mm thick is required depending on the conditions and the category of protected persons in the adjacent room.
Keywords
About the Author
V. Yu. GolikovRussian Federation
Vladislav Yu. Golikov – Senior Researcher of the Medical Protection Laboratory
Mira str., 8, Saint-Petersburg, 197101
References
1. United Nations Scientific Committee on the Effects of Atomic Radiation. Sources and Effects of Ionizing Radiation. UNSCEAR 2008 Report to the General Assembly with Scientific Annexes. Volume II, (New York, UN: Scientific Annexes C, D and E); 2011.
2. Golikov VYu. Critical analysis of the existing approach to the cal-culation of radiation shielding in X-ray rooms. Radiatsionnaya Gygiena = Radiation Hygiene . 2023;16(3): 13-21. (In Russian). DOI: 10.21514/1998-426X-2023-16-3-13-21.
3. Archer B.R., Thornby J.I., Bushong S.C. Diagnostic X-Ray Shielding Design Based on an Empirical Model of Photon Attenuation // Health Physics. 1983. Vol. 44. P. 507-517.
4. NCRP (National Council on Radiation Protection and Measurements). Radiation Protection in Dentistry. NCRP Report No. 145. NCRP, 2004.
5. Colin J. Martin. Radiation shielding for diagnostic radiology // Radiation Protection Dosimetry. 2015. Vol. 165(1–4). P. 376–381. doi:10.1093/rpd/ncv040.
6. European Commission. European guidelines on Radiation Protection in dental radiology. The safe use of radiographs in dental practice. Radiation Protection 136. European Communities, 2004.
7. Use and regulatory control of dental x-ray installations ST3.1. Radiation and Nuclaer Safety Authority, Finland, 1999.
8. National Radiological Protection Board. Guidance notes for dental practitioners on the safe use of x-ray equipment. NRPB dental x-ray protection services, 2001.
9. Helmrot E., Carlsson G.Alm. Measurement of radiation dose in dental radiology // Radiation Protection Dosimetry. 2005. Vol.114, No.1-3. P. 168-171.
10. Worrall M., McVey S., Suon D.G. Proposals for revised factors in intra-oral radiography shielding calculaons // Journal of Radiological Protection. 2012. Vol. 32, No 3. P. 243-249. doi: 10.1088/0952-4746/32/3/243.
11. Reid J.A., MacDonald J.C., Dekker T.A., Kuppers B.U. Radiation exposures around a panoramic dental X-ray unit // Oral Surgery, Oral Medicine, Oral Pathology. 1993. Vol. 75. P. 780-782.
12. Williams J.R., Fipem MSc, Montgomery A. Measurement of dose in panoramic dental radiology // British Journal of Radiology. 2000. Vol. 73, P. 1002-1006.
13. Isoardi P., Ropolo R. Measurement of dose–width product in panoramic dental radiology // British Journal of Radiology. 2003. Vol. 76, P. 129-131.
14. Holroyd J.R., Walker A. Recommendations on the design of X-ray facilities and the quality assurance of dental cone beam CT systems. HPARPD-065. Chilton: HPA, 2010.
Review
For citations:
Golikov V.Yu. About the necessary thickness of stationary shield in X-ray dental rooms. Radiatsionnaya Gygiena = Radiation Hygiene. 2024;17(2):46-52. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.21514/1998-426X-2024-17-2-46-52