Conservative assessment of external radiation dose for staff in the event of radionuclide flaw detection

The article proposes a new approach to assessing the effective doses of flaw detectorists performing flaw detection using portable radionuclide flaw detectors (gamma flaw detectors). The existing approach to assessing effective doses, based on the use of one individual dosimeter placed on work clothes in the chest area, is inadequate for the actual working conditions of exposure of flaw detectorists. Gamma flaw detectors contain a closed man-made source of ionizing radiation in their head, therefore, even in the non-working position, such flaw detectors pose a radiation hazard. When transporting and preparing gamma flaw detectors for work, the flaw detector operator is in close proximity to the radiation source. The irradiation geometry changing during the technological cycle when working with portable gamma flaw detectors at certain stages creates a sharply uneven  irradiation  of  the  flaw  detectorist’s  body.  Therefore,  after  assessing  the  stages  of  the  technological cycle, an option was proposed for a more conservative assessment of effective doses – to change the location of the individual dosimeter on the working clothes of the flaw detectorist, moving the individual dosimeter to the abdominal area. An anonymous study was carried out with the participation of 15 flaw detectorists; three individual dosimeters were displayed on their working clothes: two of them were experimental and were placed in the chest and abdomen; the third (a control dosimeter) was exposed for the quarter on the chest as part of constant individual dosimetric monitoring. In controlled anonymous measurements, the average effective dose, estimated from the readings of dosimeters exposed in the chest area, was equal to 0,95 mSv (median – 0,92 mSv, maximum value – 1,27 mSv). These values were compared with values obtained using dosimeters that were exposed to the abdomen, and the differences were significant (the average effective dose was 1,24 mSv (median – 1,22 mSv, maximum value – 1,78 mSv).

1. International Commission on Radiological Protection. (1990) Recommendations of the International Commission on Radiological Protection. ICRP Publication 60. Annals of the ICRP . 1990;21(1-3): 1-201.

2. International Commission on Radiological Protection 2007 The Recommendations of the International Commission on Radiological Protection. ICRP Publication 103. Annals of the ICRP . 2007;37: 1–332.

3. ICRU Report 43: Measurement of dose equivalents from external radiation sources, Part 2. ICRU . 1988;os-22(2): 51.

4. ICRU Report 51: Quantities and units in radiation protection dosimetry. ICRU .1993;os-26(2): 19.

5. ICRU Report 57: Conversion coefficients for use in radiological protection against external radiation. ICRU .1998;os-29(2): 137.

6. ICRU Report 60: Fundamental quantities and units for ionizing radiation. ICRU . 1998;os-31(1): 24.

7. ICRU Report 66: Determination of Operational Dose Equivalent Quantities For Neutrons. Journal of the ICRU . 2001;1(3): 94.

8. Barkovsky AN, Baryshkov NK, Bratilova AA, Kormanovskaya TA, Repin LV, Romanovich IK, et al. Doses for the population of the Russian Federation in 2015: information collection. Saint-Petersburg: NIIRG; 2016: 72 p. (In Russian).

9. Barkovsky AN, Baryshkov NK, Bratilova AA, Bruk GYa, Vorobiev BF, Kormanovskaya TA, et al. Doses for the population of the Russian Federation in 2016: information collection. Saint-Petersburg: NIIRG; 2017: 78 p. (In Russian).

10. Barkovsky AN, Ruslan R. Akhmatdinov, Rustam R. Akhmatdinov, Baryshkov NK, Biblin AM, Bratilova AA, et al. Doses for the population of the Russian Federation in 2017: information collection. Saint-Petersburg: NIIRG; 2018: 72 p. (In Russian).

11. Barkovsky AN, Ruslan R. Akhmatdinov, Rustam R. Akhmatdinov, Baryshkov NK, Biblin AM, Bratilova AA, et al. Doses for the population of the Russian Federation in 2018: information collection. Saint-Petersburg: NIIRG; 2019: 72 p. (In Russian).

12. Barkovsky AN, Ruslan R. Akhmatdinov, Rustam R. Akhmatdinov, Baryshkov NK, Biblin AM, Bratilova AA, et al. Doses for the population of the Russian Federation in 2019: information collection. Saint-Petersburg: NIIRG; 2020: 70 p. (In Russian).

13. Barkovsky AN, Ruslan R. Akhmatdinov, Rustam R. Akhmatdinov, Baryshkov NK, Biblin AM, Bratilova AA, et al. Doses for the population of the Russian Federation in 2020: information collection. Saint-Petersburg: NIIRG; 2021: 83 p. (In Russian).

14. Barkovsky AN, Ruslan R. Akhmatdinov, Rustam R. Akhmatdinov, Baryshkov NK, Biblin AM, Bratilova AA, et al. Radiation situation on the territory of the Russian Federation in 2021: A Handbook. Saint-Petersburg: NIIRG; 2022: 72 p. (In Russian).

15. Barkovsky AN, Ruslan R. Akhmatdinov, Rustam R. Akhmatdinov, Baryshkov NK, Biblin AM, Bratilova AA, et al. Radiation situation on the territory of the Russian Federation in 2022: A Handbook. Saint-Petersburg: NIIRG; 2023: 66 p. (In Russian).

16. Bazhin SYu, Shleenkova EN, Bogatyreva VYu, Ilyin VA. Comparison of effective doses for personnel performing flaw detection in stationary conditions and in situ. Radiatsionnaya Gygiena = Radiation Hygiene . 2023;16(4): 64-69. (In Russian) https://doi.org/10.21514/1998-426X-2023-16-4-64-69.