Issues of monetary evaluation of potential radiation detriment of the population of the Russian Federation
https://doi.org/10.21514/1998-426X-2025-18-1-132-139
Abstract
Introduction: Assessment of the potential radiation detriment is one of the key elements in decision-making processes within the context of the practical implementation of radiation safety requirements. In the absence of more suitable indicators, the most universal approach is based on the evaluation of detriment in monetary terms. Although detailed calculations of such detriment are specific to each scenario involving the use of sources of ionizing radiation, a rough conservative monetary evaluation can be performed using the methodology outlined in the Norms of the Radiation Safety NRB-99/2009.
The objective of this study was to assess the potential detriment associated with radiation exposure in the Russian Federation, expressed in monetary units.
Summary: The work describes the limitations of this methodology and provides an evaluation of detriment for various sources of ionizing radiation.
Conclusion: The results of this study can be used to justify and estimate the effectiveness of radiation protection measures in the Russian Federation.
Keywords
About the Authors
A. V. VodovatovRussian Federation
Aleksandr V. Vodovatov, Candidate of Biological Sciences, Head of Laboratory, Docent
197101; Mira Str., 8; Saint Petersburg
L. V. Repin
Russian Federation
Leonid V. Repin, Junior Researcher
Saint Petersburg
A. M. Biblin
Russian Federation
Artem M. Biblin, Senior Research Fellow, Head of Center
Information Analytical Center
Saint Petersburg
D. V. Kononenko
Russian Federation
Dmitry V. Kononenko, Researcher
Laboratory for Dosimetry of Natural Sources of Radiation
Saint Petersburg
G. A. Gorsky
Russian Federation
Grigory A. Gorsky, Candidate of Medical Sciences, Deputy Director of Innovation Work, Associate Professor, Docent
Department of Hygiene of Conditions of Education; Department of Work and Radiation Hygiene
Saint Petersburg
References
1. The 2007 Recommendations of the International Commission on Radiological Protection. ICRP Publication 103. Annals of the ICRP. 2007;37(2-4): 332.
2. IAEA. Radiation Protection and Safety of Radiation Sources: International Basic Safety Standards; 2014. 436 p.
3. ICRP Publication 37. Cost-Benefit Analysis in the Optimization of Radiation Protection. International Commission in Radiological Protection. Oxford; 1983. 76 p.
4. Ahmed JU, Daw HT. Cost-Benefit Analysis and Radiation Protection. IAEA bulletin. 1980;22(5/6): 13-22.
5. Moores B. Cost–risk–benefit analysis in diagnostic radiology: a theoretical and economic basis for radiation protection of the patient. Radiation Protection Dosimetry. 2016;169(1-4): 2-10. DOI: 10.1093/rpd/ncv506.
6. Exposure Due to Radionuclides in Food Other Than During a Nuclear or Radiological Emergency. Part 1: Technical Material. IAEA Safety Reports Series No. 114. Vienna: International Atomic Energy Agency; 2023. 187 p.
7. Exposure Due to Radionuclides in Food Other Than During a Nuclear or Radiological Emergency. Part 2: Considerations in Implementing Requirement 51 of IAEA General Safety Requirements Part 3 (International Basic Safety Standards). IAEA-TECDOC-2011. Vienna: International Atomic Energy Agency; 2022. 51 p.
8. Mikheeva M, Mikheeva I. Ranking dynamics of economic burden of infectious diseases as a criterion of effectiveness of epidemiologic control. Journal of microbiology, epidemiology and immunobiology. 2020;97(2): 174-181. DOI: 10.36233/0372-9311-2020-97-2-174-181 (In Russian).
Review
For citations:
Vodovatov A.V., Repin L.V., Biblin A.M., Kononenko D.V., Gorsky G.A. Issues of monetary evaluation of potential radiation detriment of the population of the Russian Federation. Radiatsionnaya Gygiena = Radiation Hygiene. 2025;18(1):132-139. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.21514/1998-426X-2025-18-1-132-139