Preview

Radiatsionnaya Gygiena = Radiation Hygiene

Advanced search

Analysis of the impact of medical and demographic indicators of the Russian population on radiation risk estimates based on the ICRP model

https://doi.org/10.21514/1998-426X-2025-18-2-29-36

Abstract

The primary quantity used for monitoring exposure levels of the general population and personnel at radiation facilities is the individual effective dose. This metric accounts for variations in the radiosensitivity of specific organs and tissues by employing corresponding tissue weighting factors recommended by the ICRP. These factors were derived based on medico-demographic data from two artificially constructed populations: "Euro-American" and "Asian." Estimates of relative harm, calculated from risk assessments, served as the basis for establishing the recommended values of tissue weighting factors for organs and tissues. However, the use of effective dose as a risk measure in cases of non-uniform exposure within specific populations raises questions about the appropriateness of applying alternative tissue weighting factors in its calculation to more rigorously account for differences in relative radiosensitivity. The study aims to assess whether the recommended values of nominal risk coefficients and weighting factors for organs and tissues provide a comparable level of safety for the Russian population compared to that provided for the ICRP nominal population. Materials and Methods: The assessment of radiation-induced cancer risk was conducted using Russian medico-demographic data from 1993 to 2022, applying the interpopulation radiation risk transfer model from ICRP Publication 152. Results and Discussion: The calculations indicate that risk estimates for most organs and tissues in the Russian population have gradually increased for males over the 30- year period. However, with the exception of thyroid cancer risk in females, these estimates do not exceed the corresponding values used to establish the tissue weighting factors. Conclusion: The current system of risk indicators and dose limits provides an adequate level of protection for the Russian population and does not require revision until international approaches to radiation protection are updated.

About the Authors

E. A. Kosarlukova
Saint Petersburg Research Institute of Radiation Hygiene after Professor P.V. Ramzaev, Federal Service for Surveillance on Consumer Rights Protection and Human Wellbeing
Russian Federation

Elena A. Kosarlukova – Acting Junior Researcher, Information Analytical Center 

Saint Petersburg 



L. V. Repin
Saint Petersburg Research Institute of Radiation Hygiene after Professor P.V. Ramzaev, Federal Service for Surveillance on Consumer Rights Protection and Human Wellbeing
Russian Federation

Leonid V. Repin – Junior Researcher, Information Analytical Center 

Mira Str., 8, Saint Petersburg, 197101 



A. M. Biblin
Saint Petersburg Research Institute of Radiation Hygiene after Professor P.V. Ramzaev, Federal Service for Surveillance on Consumer Rights Protection and Human Wellbeing
Russian Federation

Artem M. Biblin – Head of Information Analytical Cente 

Saint Petersburg 



R. R. Akhmatdinov
Saint Petersburg Research Institute of Radiation Hygiene after Professor P.V. Ramzaev, Federal Service for Surveillance on Consumer Rights Protection and Human Wellbeing
Russian Federation

Rustam R. Akhmatdinov – Engineer-Researcher, Information Analytical Center 

Saint Petersburg 



References

1. The 2007 Recommendations of the International Commission on Radiological Protection. ICRP Publication 103. Annals of the ICRP. 2007;37(2-4): 332.

2. Radiation detriment calculation methodology. ICRP Publication 152. Annals of the ICRP. 2022;51(3).

3. Gorski AI, Chekin SYu, Maksioutov MA, Menyailo AN, Korelo AM, Tumanov KA, et al. Transfer of ICRP models of radiation risk to the population of the Russian Federation. Radiation and Risk. 2019;28(4): 5-15. (In Russian). DOI: 10.21870/0131-3878-2019-28-4-5-15.

4. Gubin AT, Redko VI, Sakovich VA. The impact of the demographic characteristics of the population on estimates of the coefficients of radiogenic risk in the Russian population. Radiatsionnaya Gygiena = Radiation Hygiene. 2016;9(4): 2636. (In Russian). DOI: 10.21514/1998-426X-2016-9-4-26-36.

5. Repin LV, Nikolaevich MS. Acceptability evaluation for using ICRP tissue weighting factors to calculate effective dose value for separate gender-age groups of Russian Federation. Radiatsionnaya Gygiena = Radiation Hygiene. 2013;6(1): 38- 44. (In Russian).

6. Petrova GV, Kaprin AD, Gretsova OP, Starinsky VV. Malignant neoplasms in Russia. Review of statistical information for 1993–2013. Moscow: P. Hertsen MORI –branch of the FSBI NMRRC of the Ministry of Health of Russia. 2015; 510 p. (In Russian).

7. Malignant neoplasms in Russia in 2007 (incidence and mortality). Ed. VI Chissov, VV Starinsky, GV Petrova. Moscow: Federal State Institution “P.A. Hertsen Moscow Medical Research Institute of Medical Technology of the Russian Federation”; 2009, 244 p. (In Russian).

8. Malignant neoplasms in Russia in 2008 (morbidity and mortality). Ed. by VI Chissov, VV Starinsky, GV Petrova. Moscow: FGU “P.A. Hertsen MNIOI Rosmedtechnologii”; 2010. 256 p. (In Russian).

9. Malignant neoplasms in Russia in 2009 (morbidity and mortality). Ed. by VI Chissov, VV Starinsky, GV Petrova. Moscow: FGU “P.A. Hertsen MNIOI of the Ministry of Health and Social Development of Russia”; 2011. 260 p. (In Russian).

10. Malignant neoplasms in Russia in 2010 (morbidity and mortality). Ed. by VI Chissov, VV Starinsky, GV Petrova. Moscow: FGBU “P.A. Hertsen MNIOI” Ministry of Health and Social Development of Russia; 2012. 260 p. (In Russian).

11. Malignant neoplasms in Russia in 2011 (morbidity and mortality). Ed. by VI Chissov, VV Starinsky, GV Petrova. Moscow: FGBU “P.A. Hertsen MNIOI” of the Ministry of Health of Russia; 2013. 289 p. (In Russian).

12. Malignant neoplasms in Russia in 2012 (morbidity and mortality). Ed. by AD Kaprin, VV Starinsky, GV Petrova. Moscow: FGBU “P.A. Hertsen MNIOI” of the Ministry of Health of Russia; 2014. 250 p. (In Russian).

13. Malignant neoplasms in Russia in 2013 (morbidity and mortality). Ed. by AD Kaprin, VV Starinsky, GV Petrova. Moscow: P.A. Hertsen MNIOI – branch of FGBU “P.A. Hertsen FMIC” of the Ministry of Health of Russia; 2015. 250 p. (In Russian).

14. Malignant neoplasms in Russia in 2014 (morbidity and mortality). Ed. by AD Kaprin, VV Starinsky, GV Petrova. Moscow: P.A. Hertsen MNIOI – branch of FGBU “NMIRC” of the Ministry of Health of Russia; 2016. 250 p. (In Russian).

15. Malignant neoplasms in Russia in 2015 (morbidity and mortality). Ed. by AD Kaprin, VV Starinsky, GV Petrova. Moscow: P.A. Hertsen MNIOI – branch of FGBU “NMIRC” of the Ministry of Health of Russia; 2017. 250 p. (In Russian).

16. Malignant neoplasms in Russia in 2016 (morbidity and mortality). Ed. by AD Kaprin, VV Starinsky, GV Petrova. Moscow: P.A. Hertsen MNIOI – branch of FGBU “NMRC Radiology” of the Ministry of Health of Russia; 2018. 250 p. (In Russian).

17. Malignant neoplasms in Russia in 2017 (morbidity and mortality). Ed. by AD Kaprin, VV Starinsky, GV Petrova. Moscow: P.A. Hertsen MNIOI – branch of FGBU “NMRC Radiology” of the Ministry of Health of Russia; 2018. 250 p. (In Russian).

18. Malignant neoplasms in Russia in 2018 (morbidity and mortality). Ed. by AD Kaprin, VV Starinsky, GV Petrova. Moscow: P.A. Hertsen MNIOI – branch of FGBU “NMIC Radiology” of the Ministry of Health of Russia; 2019. 250 p. (In Russian).

19. Malignant neoplasms in Russia in 2019 (morbidity and mortality). Ed. by AD Kaprin, VV Starinsky, AO Shakhzadova. Moscow: P.A. Hertsen MNIOI – branch of FGBU “NMRC Radiology” of the Ministry of Health of Russia; 2020. 252 p. (In Russian).

20. Malignant neoplasms in Russia in 2020 (morbidity and mortality). Ed. by AD Kaprin, VV Starinsky, AO Shakhzadova. Moscow: P.A. Hertsen MNIOI – branch of FGBU “NMRC Radiology” of the Ministry of Health of Russia; 2021. 252 p. (In Russian).

21. Malignant neoplasms in Russia in 2021 (morbidity and mortality). Ed. by AD Kaprin, VV Starinsky, AO Shakhzadova. Moscow: P.A. Hertsen MNIOI – branch of FGBU “NMRC Radiology” of the Ministry of Health of Russia; 2022. 252 p. (In Russian).

22. Malignant neoplasms in Russia in 2022 (morbidity and mortality). Ed. by AD Kaprin et al. Moscow: P.A. Hertsen MNIOI – branch of FGBU “NMRC Radiology” of the Ministry of Health of Russia; 2023. 275 p. (In Russian).

23. Federal State Statistics Service. Population of men of the Russian Federation by sex and age. Available from: https://www.fedstat.ru/indicator/31548 [Accessed 09 April 2025].

24. Federal State Statistics Service. Population of women of the Russian Federation by sex and age. Available from: https://www.fedstat.ru/indicator/33459 [Accessed 09 April 2025].

25. Federal State Statistics Service. Demographic Yearbook of Russia. Available from: https://rosstat.gov.ru/folder/210/document/13207 [Accessed 09 April 2025].


Review

For citations:


Kosarlukova E.A., Repin L.V., Biblin A.M., Akhmatdinov R.R. Analysis of the impact of medical and demographic indicators of the Russian population on radiation risk estimates based on the ICRP model. Radiatsionnaya Gygiena = Radiation Hygiene. 2025;18(2):29-36. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.21514/1998-426X-2025-18-2-29-36

Views: 93


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 1998-426X (Print)
ISSN 2409-9082 (Online)