Preview

Radiatsionnaya Gygiena = Radiation Hygiene

Advanced search

Preconception exposure of mothers: The review of epidemiological research

https://doi.org/10.21514/1998-426X-2025-18-2-77-86

Abstract

A review of epidemiological research of the effects of preconception (prior to conception) radiation exposure to a mother’s body was presented. The anatomical and physiological characteristics that affect radiosensitivity and radioresistance of female reproductive system were reported. Biological prerequisites accounting for different effects of radiation exposure to animals and humans were indicated. The results that were published in open access on epidemiological assessments of the effects of preconception exposure of mothers to the health of their offspring were described based on various cohorts as examples. Analysis of the research work was performed for the cohort of the offspring of atomic bomb survivors in Japan, among the offspring of the individuals affected by radiation accidents and nuclear weapon tests, among the population of the sites with high natural level of radiation. The results of research work among the offspring of female patients exposed to diagnostic and therapeutical radiation and of the offspring of the mothers who were in contact with ionizing radiation sources at workplaces were presented. A special attention was paid to specifics of standardization of occupational exposure of female personnel according to national and international approaches. Generally, it was demonstrated that despite a wide range of epidemiological research works there is still no clear understanding of the effects of preconception exposure of mothers to their offspring. The total results of the analysis of the effects of maternal exposure in preconception period are quite controversial and usually involve a range of uncertainties. In the course of such sort of epidemiological research the following difficulties are indicated: poor verification of medical outcomes, primary data based on questionnaire surveys, lack of detailed information on individual exposure parameters, low statistical power of research works and too short period of follow up of the cohort under research. For this reason, the necessity of further analysis of the effects of exposure of female body was indicated involving detailed risk coefficients of unfavorable reproductive outcomes. Prospective trends for epidemiological analysis of preconception exposure of mothers were indicated. Feasibility of assessment of long-term preconception radiation exposure was described based on the cohort of female workers of Mayak Production Association that is the leading atomic enterprise in the national history.

About the Author

S. F. Sosnina
Southern Urals federal research and clinical center of medical biophysics of the Federal Medical-Biological Agency
Russian Federation

Svetlana F. Sosnina – Candidate of Medical Sciences, Senior Research Scientist at the Department of Epidemiology

Ozyorskoe shosse, 19, Ozyorsk, Chelyabinsk Region, 456780 



References

1. The 2007 Recommendations of the International Commission on Radiological Protection. ICRP publication 103. Annals of the ICRP. 2007;37(2-4): 1-332. DOI: 10.1016/j.icrp.2007.10.003.

2. Shtaut MI. Morphogenetic chromatin reorganization aspects at the preleptoten stage of human spermatogenesis. Andrologiya i genitalnaya khirurgiya = Andrology and genital Surgery. 2016;17(2): 104-111. (In Russian).

3. De Felici M, Klinger FG, Farini D, Scaldaferri ML, Iona S, Lobascio M. Establishment of oocyte population in the fetal ovary: primordial germ cell proliferation and oocyte programmed cell death. Reproductive Biomedicine Online. 2005;10(2): 182-91. DOI: 10.1016/s1472-6483(10)60939-x.

4. Marchenko LA, Mashaeva RI, Chernuha GE. Current views on the molecular mechanisms of the initial stages of folliculogenesis. Ginekologiya = Gynecology. 2020; 22(5): 57-60. (In Russian).

5. Russell LB, Russell WL. Frequency and nature of specificlocus mutations induced in female mice by radiations and chemicals: a review. Mutation Research. 1992;296(1-2): 107-27. DOI: 10.1016/0165-1110(92)90035-8.

6. Griffiths MJ, Winship AL, Hutt KJ. Do cancer therapies damage the uterus and compromise fertility? Human Reproduction Update. 2020;26(2): 161-173. DOI: 10.1093/humupd/dmz041.

7. Mazunin IO, Volodko NV, Starikovskaya EB, Sukernik RI. Mitochondrial genome and human mitochondrial diseases. Molekulyarnaya biologiya = Molecular Biology. 2010; 44(5): 755- 772. DOI: 10.1134/S0026893310050018. (In Russian).

8. Leung CT, Yang Y, Yu KN, Tam N, Chan TF, Lin X, et al. LowDose Radiation Can Cause Epigenetic Alterations Associated with Impairments in Both Male and Female Reproductive Cells. Frontiers in genetics. 2021;12: 710143. DOI: 10.3389/fgene.2021.710143

9. Neel JV, Schull WJ. The Children of Atomic Bomb Survivors: A Genetic Study. Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press; 1991. 518 p.

10. Tatsukawa Y, Cologne JB, Hsu WL, Yamada M, Ohishi W, Hida A, et al. Radiation risk of individual multifactorial diseases in offspring of the atomic-bomb survivors: a clinical health study. Journal of Radiological Protection. 2013;33(2): 281-293. DOI: 10.1088/0952-4746/33/2/281

11. Izumi S, Suyama A, Koyama K. Radiation-related mortality among offspring of atomic bomb survivors: a half-century of follow-up. International Journal of Cancer. 2003;107(2): 292-7. DOI: 10.1002/ijc.11400.

12. Grant EJ, Furukawa K, Sakata R, Sugiyama H, Sadakane A, Takahashi I, et al. Risk of death among children of atomic bomb survivors after 62 years of follow-up: a cohort study. The Lancet. Oncology. 2015;16(13): 1316- 1323. DOI: 10.1016/S1470-2045(15)00209-0.

13. Ozasa K, Grant EJ, Kodama K. Japanese Legacy Cohorts: The Life Span Study Atomic Bomb Survivor Cohort and Survivors' Offspring. Journal of epidemiology. 2018;28(4): 162-169. DOI: 10.2188/jea.JE20170321

14. Hasegawa A, Tanigawa K, Ohtsuru A, Yabe H, Maeda M, Shigemura J, et al. Health effects of radiation and other health problems in the aftermath of nuclear accidents, with an emphasis on Fukushima. Lancet. 2015;386(9992): 479- 488. DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(15)61106-0.

15. Goldhaber MK, Staub SL, Tokuhata GK. Spontaneous abortions after the Three Mile Island nuclear accident: a life table analysis. American Journal of Public Health. 1983;73(7): 752-9. DOI: 10.2105/ajph.73.7.752.

16. Krestinina LJu, Shalaginov SA, Starcev NV. Urals cohort of exposed population offspring. Voprosy radiatsionnoy bezopasnosti = Radiation safety issues. 2022;4(108): 86-94. (In Russian).

17. Baleva LS, Zosimova IV, Jakovleva IN. Immediate and long-term effects of radiation exposure on the health of the child population. Pediatriya. Zhurnal im. G.N. Speranskogo = Pediatrics. The G.N. Speransky Journal. 1989;1: 100. (In Russian).

18. Ionova OM. The dynamics of the health of children born to the liquidators of the Chernobyl accident and the prevention of its violations: abstract. diss. … Cand. Med. Sciences: Ivanovo; 2004. 21 p. (In Russian).

19. Moleva VI, Kashina-Jarmak VL. Features of the state of health and immunological homeostasis in children whose parents lived in radiation pollution zones in childhood and adolescence. Medikobiologicheskie problemy zhiznedeyatelnosti = Medical and biological problems of vital activity. 2011; 1(5): 42-47. (In Russian).

20. Baleva LS, Yakovleva IN, Sipyagina AE, Karakhan NM, Danilycheva LI, Zemlyanskaya ZK, et al. Morphofunctional changes of the thyroid gland in children exposed to radiation as a result of the Chernobyl nuclear power plant accident and children-descendants of irradiated parents. Voprosy prakticheskoy pediatrii = Issues of practical pediatrics. 2012;7(4): 13–16. (In Russian).

21. Baleva LS, Sipyagina AE, Jurov IYu, Sukhorukov VS, Karakhan NM. Features of mental retardation in children born to irradiated parents. Rossiyskiy vestnik perinatologii i pediatrii = Russian Bulletin of Perinatology and Pediatrics. 2017;62(4): 223-224. (In Russian).

22. Sperling K, Neitzel H, Scherb H. Evidence for an increase in trisomy 21 (Down syndrome) in Europe after the Chernobyl reactor accident. Genetic Epidemiology. 2012;36(1): 48-55. DOI: 10.1002/gepi.20662.

23. Kurita N. Association of the Great East Japan Earthquake and the Daiichi Nuclear Disaster in Fukushima City, Japan, with Birth Rates. JAMA network open. 2019;2(1): e187455. DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2018.7455.

24. Yasuda S, Kyozuka H, Nomura Y, Fujimori K, Goto A, Yasumura S, et al. Influence of the Great East Japan Earthquake and the Fukushima Daiichi nuclear disaster on the birth weight of newborns in Fukushima Prefecture: Fukushima Health Management Survey. The journal of maternal-fetal & neonatal medicine. 2017;30(24): 2900-2904. DOI: 10.1080/14767058.2016.1245718.

25. Kyozuka H, Murata T, Yasuda S, Ishii K, Fujimori K, Goto A, et al. The Effects of the Great East Japan Earthquake on Perinatal Outcomes: Results of the Pregnancy and Birth Survey in the Fukushima Health Management Survey. Journal of Epidemiology. 2022;32(Suppl_XII): S57-S63. DOI: 10.2188/jea.JE20210444.

26. Scherb HH, Mori K, Hayashi K. Increases in perinatal mortality in prefectures contaminated by the Fukushima nuclear power plant accident in Japan: A spatially stratified longitudinal study. Medicine (Baltimore). 2016;95(38): e4958. DOI: 10.1097/MD.0000000000004958.

27. Simon SL, Bouville A, Land CE, Beck HL. Radiation doses and cancer risks in the Marshall Islands associated with exposure to radioactive fallout from Bikini and Enewetak nuclear weapons tests: summary. Health Physics. 2010;99(2): 105-23. DOI: 10.1097/HP.0b013e3181dc523c.

28. Nembhard WN, McElfish PA, Ayers B, Collins RT, Shan X, Rabie NZ, et al. Nuclear radiation and prevalence of structural birth defects among infants born to women from the Marshall Islands. Birth Defects Research. 2019;111(16): 1192-1204. DOI: 10.1002/bdr2.1551.

29. Wu B, Arslanian KJ, Nyhan K, Suss R, Mahoney M, McElfish PA, et al. Preterm birth among Pacific Islanders in the United States and the US-affiliated Pacific Islands: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Birth. 2023;50(2): 287-299. DOI: 10.1111/birt.12713.

30. Apsalikov KN, Lipikhina A, Grosche B, Belikhina T, Ostroumova E, Shinkarev S, et al. The State Scientific Automated Medical Registry, Kazakhstan: an important resource for low-dose radiation health research. Radiation and Environmental Biophysics. 2019;58(1): 1-11. DOI: 10.1007/s00411-018-0762-5.

31. Gureva VA. The state of health of women in two generations living in the territory exposed to radiation during the tests of a nuclear device at the Semipalatinsk test site: abstract. diss. ... Doctor of Medical Sciences. Saint-Petersburg; 1996. 34 p. (In Russian).

32. Dudareva YuA, Gureva VA. The range of reproductive disorders in offspring and their progenitors who were in the radiation exposure zone. Problemy reproduktsii = Problems of reproduction. 2020;26(5): 72-77. (In Russian).

33. Zheleznikova LI. Radiation contamination of the territory and congenital malformations (on the example of the impact on the population of the Altai Territory of nuclear device tests at the Semipalatinsk test site): abstract. diss. ... Cand. Biol. Sciences. Kemerovo; 2000. 23 p. (In Russian).

34. Gordeev VV. Long-term medical consequences of the nuclear explosion of 1949 in children of the 1st and 2nd generations of the irradiated population of the Altai Territory: abstract. diss. ...Doctor of Medical Sciences. Moscow; 2003. 46 p. (In Russian).

35. Sudheer KR, Mohammad Koya PK, Prakash AJ, Prakash AM, Manoj Kumar R, Shyni S, et al. Evaluation of risk due to chronic low dose ionizing radiation exposure on the birth prevalence of congenital heart diseases (CHD) among the newborns from highlevel natural radiation areas of Kerala coast, India. Genes and environment. 2022;44(1): 1. DOI: 10.1186/s41021-021-00231-0.

36. Padmanabhan VT, Sugunan AP, Brahmaputhran CK, Nandini K, Pavithran K. Heritable anomalies among the inhabitants of regions of normal and high background radiation in Kerala: results of a cohort study, 1988-1994. International Journal of Health Services. 2004;34(3): 483- 515. DOI: 10.2190/3XYE-QJPU-01BF-8YKE.

37. Dobrzyński L, Fornalski KW, Feinendegen LE. Cancer Mortality Among People Living in Areas with Various Levels of Natural Background Radiation. Dose Response. 2015;13(3): 1559325815592391. DOI: 10.1177/1559325815592391.

38. Blatt J. Pregnancy outcome in long-term survivors of childhood cancer. Medical and Pediatric Oncology. 1999;33(1): 29-33. DOI: 10.1002/(sici)1096-911x(199907)33:1<29::aid-mpo6>3.0.co;2-2.

39. Chiarelli AM, Marrett LD, Darlington GA. Pregnancy outcomes in females after treatment for childhood cancer. Epidemiology. 2000;11(2): 161-6. DOI: 10.1097/00001648-200003000-00013.

40. van de Loo LEXM, van den Berg MH, Overbeek A, van Dijk M, Damen L, Lambalk CB, et al. Uterine function, pregnancy complications, and pregnancy outcomes among female childhood cancer survivors. Fertility and sterility. 2019;111(2): 372-380. DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2018.10.016.

41. Reulen RC, Zeegers MP, Wallace WH, Frobisher C, Taylor AJ, Lancashire ER, et al. Pregnancy outcomes among adult survivors of childhood cancer in the British Childhood Cancer Survivor Study. Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers and Prevention. 2009;18(8): 2239-2247. DOI: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-09-0287.

42. Oktem O, Kim SS, Selek U, Schatmann G, Urman B. Ovarian and Uterine Functions in Female Survivors of Childhood Cancers. Oncologist. 2018;23(2): 214-224. DOI: 10.1634/theoncologist.2017-0201.

43. Teh WT, Stern C, Chander S, Hickey M. The impact of uterine radiation on subsequent fertility and pregnancy outcomes. Biomed Research International. 2014;2014: 482968. DOI: 10.1155/2014/482968.

44. Signorello LB, Mulvihill JJ, Green DM, Munro HM, Stovall M, Weathers RE, et al. Stillbirth and neonatal death in relation to radiation exposure before conception: a retrospective cohort study. Lancet. 2010;376(9741): 624- 630. DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(10)60752-0.

45. van der Kooi ALF, Mulder RL, Hudson MM, Kremer LCM, Skinner R, Constine LS, et al. Counseling and surveillance of obstetrical risks for female childhood, adolescent, and young adult cancer survivors: recommendations from the International Late Effects of Childhood Cancer Guideline Harmonization Group. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology. 2021;224(1): 3-15. DOI: 10.1016/j.ajog.2020.05.058.

46. Patton T, Olshan AF, Neglia JP, Castleberry RP, Smith J. Parental exposure to medical radiation and neuroblastoma in offspring. Paediatric and perinatal epidemiology. 2004;18(3): 178-185. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-3016.2004.00554.x.

47. Uchida IA, Holunga R, Lawler C. Maternal radiation and chromosomal aberrations. Lancet. 1968;2(7577): 1045- 1049. DOI: 10.1016/s0140-6736(68)91525-0.

48. Goldberg MS, Mayo NE, Levy AR, Scott SC, Poîtras B. Adverse reproductive outcomes among women exposed to low levels of ionizing radiation from diagnostic radiography for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Epidemiology. 1998;9(3): 271-278.

49. Lowe SA. Ionizing radiation for maternal medical indications. Prenatal Diagnosis. 2020;40(9): 1150-1155. DOI: 10.1002/pd.5592.

50. Comments on Radiation Safety Standards (NRB-99/2009) / ed. Academician of the Russian Academy of Medical Sciences G.G. Onishchenko. Moscow: Saint Petersburg Research Institute of Radiation Hygiene; 2012. 216 p. (In Russian).

51. Lassi ZS, Imam AM, Dean SV, Bhutta ZA. Preconception care: caffeine, smoking, alcohol, drugs and other environmental chemical/radiation exposure. Reproductive Health. 2014;11: S3-S6. DOI: 10.1186/1742-4755-11-S3-S6.

52. Shirangi A, Fritschi L, Holman CD. Maternal occupational exposures and risk of spontaneous abortion in veterinary practice. Occupational and Environmental Medicine. 2008;65(11): 719-725. DOI: 10.1136/oem.2007.035246.

53. Shakhatreh FM. Reproductive health of male radiographers. Saudi Medical Journal. 2001;22(2): 150-152.

54. Irgens Å, Irgens LM, Reitan JB, Haldorsen T, Tveten U. Pregnancy outcome among offspring of airline pilots and cabin attendants. Scandinavian Journal of Work, Environment and Health. 2003;29(2): 94-99. DOI: 10.5271/sjweh.710.

55. Doyle P, Maconochie N, Roman E, Davies G, Smith PG, Beral V. Fetal death and congenital malformation in babies born to nuclear industry employees: report from the nuclear industry family study. Lancet. 2000;356(9238): 1293-9. DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(00)02812-9.

56. Sever LE, Gilbert ES, Hessol NA, McIntyre JM. A casecontrol study of congenital malformations and occupational exposure to low-level ionizing radiation. American Journal of Epidemiology. 1988;127(2): 226-242. DOI: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a114799.

57. Petrushkina NP. The health of the descendants of employees of the atomic industry enterprise, the Mayak Production Association. Moscow: RADEKON; 1998. 184 p. (In Russian).

58. Green LM, Dodds L, Miller AB, Tomkins DJ, Li J, Escobar M. Risk of congenital anomalies in children of parents occupationally exposed to low level ionising radiation. Occupational and Environmental Medicine. 1997;54(9): 629-635. DOI: 10.1136/oem.54.9.629.

59. Roman E, Doyle P, Maconochie N, Davies G, Smith PG, Beral V. Cancer in children of nuclear industry employees: report on children aged under 25 years from nuclear industry family study. British Medical Journal. 1999;318(7196): 1443-50. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.318.7196.1443.

60. Little MP, Goodhead DT, Bridges BA, Bouffler SD. Evidence relevant to untargeted and transgenerational effects in the offspring of irradiated parents. Mutation Research. 2013;753(1): 50-67. DOI: 10.1016/j.mrrev.2013.04.


Review

For citations:


Sosnina S.F. Preconception exposure of mothers: The review of epidemiological research. Radiatsionnaya Gygiena = Radiation Hygiene. 2025;18(2):77-86. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.21514/1998-426X-2025-18-2-77-86

Views: 46


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 1998-426X (Print)
ISSN 2409-9082 (Online)