Preview

Radiatsionnaya Gygiena = Radiation Hygiene

Advanced search

Measurement of effective activity concentration of natural radionuclides insitu for assessment of ambient dose equivalent rate in urban environments

https://doi.org/10.21514/1998-426X-2025-18-2-109-121

Abstract

At present, the dose rate of gamma radiation from technogenic radionuclides in the territories contaminated as a result of the Chernobyl accident has significantly decreased and, in many cases, is comparable to the dose rate of gamma radiation from natural radionuclides. Therefore, when assessing the external doses to the population at these territories, it is important to correctly evaluate the contribution of natural radiation. The use of field gamma spectrometry (in situ measurements) allows solving this task directly on site without collection of environmental samples and subsequent analytical procedures in laboratory. For the in situ measurements, it is most convenient to use the gamma spectrometers that simultaneously measure both the dose rate in air and the effective activity concentration of natural radionuclides (226Ra, 232Th and 40K). The latter value is unambiguously related to the dose rate of gamma radiation from natural radionuclides when measurements are carried out in the 2π geometry. The possibility of using the results of measuring the effective activity concentration in conditions different from the 2π geometry, in particular, in an urban environment, requires justification. The aim of the study was to empirically determine the relationship between the ambient dose equivalent rate from natural radionuclides and the effective activity concentration of natural radionuclides in typical urban locations. Materials and methods. Simultaneous measurements (n = 170) of the total ambient dose equivalent rate and effective activity concentration were performed in the city of St. Petersburg (Russia) in the spring-autumn period in 2017–2024 using a portable gamma spectrometerdosimeter. The device was placed in a backpack on the operator's back. Main results. Based on results of the in situ measurements, the conversion coefficient from effective activity concentration to ambient dose equivalent rate ((nSv/h)/(Bq/kg)) was calculated. The mean ± standard deviation value of the conversion coefficient for the location “street”, “courtyard”, “square”, “embankment”, “bridge”, “park-lawn”, and “park-footpath” was 0.55 ± 0.02 (n = 70), 0.55 ± 0.01 (11), 0.55 ± 0.02 (10), 0.54 ± 0.01 (9), 0.54 ± 0.04 (16), 0.57 ± 0.02 (27), and 0.54 ± 0.01 (27), respectively. Conclusion. The obtained values of the conversion coefficient can be used when performing walk surveys of urban areas to determine contribution of natural sources to the total dose rate of gamma radiation in the case of radioactive contamination of the environment.

About the Authors

V. P. Ramzaev
Saint Petersburg Research Institute of Radiation Hygiene after Professor P.V. Ramzaev, Federal Service for Surveillance of Consumer Rights Protection and Human Wellbeing
Russian Federation

Valery P. Ramzaev – Candidate of Medical Sciences, Leading Researcher of the Laboratory of External Exposure



A. N. Barkovsky
Saint Petersburg Research Institute of Radiation Hygiene after Professor P.V. Ramzaev, Federal Service for Surveillance of Consumer Rights Protection and Human Wellbeing
Russian Federation

Anatoly N. Barkovsky – Head of the Federal Radiological Centre 



References

1. Ramzaev VP, Barkovsky AN, Bratilova AA. Ambient dose equivalent rate and soil contamination density with 137Cs in kitchen gardens in settlements of the Bryansk region, Russia in 2020–2021. Radiatsionnaya Gygiena = Radiation Hygiene. 2021;14(4): 85–95. (In Russian). DOI: 10.21514/1998-426X-2021-14-4-85-95.

2. Ramzaev VP, Barkovsky AN, Bratilova AA. Ambient dose equivalent rate from 137Cs and natural radionuclides in onestory residential buildings in settlements of the Bryansk region in 2020–2021. Radiatsionnaya Gygiena = Radiation Hygiene. 2022;15(2): 95–107. (In Russian). DOI: 10.21514/1998-426X-2022-15-2-95-107.

3. Beck HL, DeCampo J, Gogolak C. In situ Ge(Li) and NaI(Tl) gamma-ray spectrometry. Report HASL-258, USAEC, New York, NY: Health and Safety Laboratory; 1972.

4. Clouvas A, Xanthos S, Antonopoulus-Domis M. Extended survey of indoor and outdoor terrestrial gamma radiation in Greek urban areas by in situ gamma spectrometry with a portable Ge detector. Radiation Protection Dosimetry. 2001;94(3): 233-246. DOI: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.rpd.a006495.

5. Roed J, Lange CL, Andersson KG, Prip H, Olsen S, Ramzaev V, et al. Decontamination in a Russian settlement. RISØ National Laboratory report Risø-R-870 (EN). RISØ National Laboratory, Roskilde, Denmark; 1996.

6. Ramzaev V, Yonehara H, Hille R, Barkovsky A, Mishine A, Sahoo SK, et al. Gamma-dose rates from terrestrial and Chernobyl radionuclides inside and outside settlements in the Bryansk Region, Russia in 1996–2003. Journal of Environmental Radioactivity. 2006;85: 205–227. DOI: 10.1016/j.jenvrad.2004.04.014.

7. Zinsou MB, Houessouvo CR, Rabesiranana N, Allodji RS, Medenou D, Dossou J, et al. Gamma radiation dose rate measurements in granite quarries and schools in two mountainous towns in Benin. Brazilian Journal of Radiation Sciences. 2024;12(4): 1–34. DOI: 10.15392/2319-0612.2024.2517.

8. Lemercier M, Gurriaran R, Bouisset P, Cagnat X. Specific activity to H*(10) conversion coefficients for in situ gamma spectrometry. Radiation Protection Dosimetry. 2008;128(1): 83–89. DOI: 10.1093/rpd/ncm307.

9. Askri B, Manai K, Bouzouita A, Zaidi E, Trabelsi A. Estimation of the gamma-ray field in air from radioactive sources in the ground by numerical solution of the Boltzmann transport equation. Radiation Protection Dosimetry. 2023;199(7): 631–645. DOI: 10.1093/rpd/ncad064.

10. UNSCEAR – United Nations Scientific Committee on the Effects of Atomic Radiation. Sources and Effects of Ionizing Radiation, Report to the General Assembly with Scientific Annexes. United Nations, New York; 2000.

11. Satoh D, Petoussi-Henss N. Dose-rate coefficients for external exposure to radionuclides uniformly distributed in soil to an infinite depth. PLoS ONE. 2024;19(9): e0310552. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0310552.

12. Stamat IP, Lisachenko EP. Effective specific activity of natural radionuclides in the NORM belonged to the 238U and 232Th series being in the state of disturbed radioactive equilibrium. Radiatsionnaya Gygiena = Radiation Hygiene. 2008;1(1): 27–31. (In Russian).

13. Stamat IP, Kononenko DV, Kormanovskaya TA, Koroleva NA. Analysis of data of doses of external terrigenous irradiation of the Russian Federation population in municipal conditions. Radiatsionnaya Gygiena = Radiation Hygiene. 2015;8(3): 33–48. (In Russian).

14. Ramzaev V, Barkovsky A, Bernhardsson C, Mattsson S. Calibration and testing of a portable NaI(Tl) gamma-ray spectrometer-dosimeter for evaluation of terrestrial radionuclides and 137Cs contributions to ambient dose equivalent rate outdoors. Radiatsionnaya Gygiena = Radiation Hygiene. 2017;10(1): 18–29. DOI: 10.21514/1998-426x-2017-10-1-18-29.

15. Ramzaev V, Bernhardsson C, Barkovsky A, Romanovich I, Jarneborn J, Mattsson S, et al. A backpack γ-spectrometer for measurements of ambient dose equivalent rate, H*(10), from 137Cs and from naturally occurring radiation: the importance of operator related attenuation. Radiation Measurements. 2017;107: 14–22. DOI: 10.1016/j.radmeas.2017.10.002.

16. Ramzaev V, Bernhardsson C, Vodovatov A, Chipiga L, Nekrasov V, Dvornik A. Ambient dose equivalent rates of gamma radiation from natural radionuclides and 137Cs at grasslands and forests in the area of the Belarusian NPP in the pre-commissioning period (2019). Radiation Protection Dosimetry. 2024;200(5): 496-503. DOI: 10.1093/rpd/ncae016.

17. Cresswell AJ, Sanderson DCW, Harrold M, Kirley B, Mitchell C, Weir A. Demonstration of lightweight gamma spectrometry systems in urban environments. Journal of Environmental Radioactivity. 2013;124: 22–28. DOI: 10.1016/j.jenvrad.2013.03.006.

18. De Cort M, Dubois G, Fridman ShD, Germenchuk MG, Izrael YuA, Janssens A, et al. Atlas of Caesium Deposition on Europe after the Chernobyl Accident. EUR Report 16733. EC, Office for Official Publications of the European Commission Communities, Luxembourg; 1998.

19. ATOMTEX. Spectrometer AT6101DR. Available on: https://old.atomtex.com/en/at6101dr-spectrometer (Accessed 28 February 2025).

20. Nilsson JMC, Östlund K, Söderberg J, Mattsson S, Rääf C. Tests of HPGe- and scintillation-based backpack γ-radiation survey systems. Journal of Environmental Radioactivity. 2014;135: 54–62. DOI: 10.1016/j.jenvrad.2014.03.013.

21. Buchanan E, Cresswell AJ, Seitz B, Sanderson DCW. Operator related attenuation effects in radiometric surveys. Radiation Measurements. 2016;86: 24–31. DOI: 10.1016/j.radmeas.2015.12.029.

22. Andoh M, Yamamoto H, Kanno T, Saito K. Measurement of ambient dose equivalent rates by walk survey around Fukushima Dai-ichi Nuclear Power Plant using KURAMA-II until 2016. Journal of Environmental Radioactivity. 2019;210: 105812. DOI: 10.1016/j.jenvrad.2018.09.010.

23. Poltabtim W, Musikawan S, Thumwong A, Omori Y, Kranrod C, Hosoda M, et al. Estimation of ambient dose equivalent rate distribution map using walking survey technique in Hirosaki City, Aomori, Japan. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 2023;20(3): 2657. DOI: 10.3390/ijerph20032657.

24. Altfelder S, Preugschat B, Matos M, Kandzia F, Wiens B, Eshmuradov O, et al. Upscaling ground-based backpack gamma-ray spectrometry to spatial resolution of UAVbased gamma-ray spectrometry for system validation. Journal of Environmental Radioactivity. 2024;273: 107382. DOI: 10.1016/j.jenvrad.2024.107382.

25. Nowak K, Solecki A. Factors affecting background gamma radiation in the urban space. Journal of Elementology. 2015;20(3): 653–665. DOI: 10.5601/jelem.2014.19.4.755.

26. Nowak K. Natural background gamma radiation in the urban space of Walbrzych. Proceedings of ECOpole. 2016;10(1): 47–56. DOI: 10.2429/proc.2016.10(1)006.

27. Chubirko MI, Klepikov OV, Kurolap SA, Kuzmichev MK, Studenikina EM. Estimation of the equivalent dose rate of gamma radiation in the open territory of the city of Voronezh. Radiatsionnaya Gygiena = Radiation Hygiene. 2019;12(4): 66–71. (In Russian). DOI: 10.21514/1998-426X-2019-12-4-66-71.

28. Medeiros FHM, Yoshimura EM. Influence of soil and buildings on outdoor gamma dose rates in Sao Paulo, Brazil. Health Physics. 2005;88(1): 65–70. DOI: 10.1097/01.hp.0000142499.92778.76.

29. Ramzaev V, Bernhardsson C, Dvornik A, Barkovsky A, Vodovatov A, Jönsson M, et al. Calculation of the effective external dose rate to a person staying in the resettlement zone of the Vetka district of the Gomel region of Belarus based on in situ and ex situ assessments in 2016–2018. Journal of Environmental Radioactivity. 2020;214–215: 106168. DOI: 10.1016/j.jenvrad.2020.106168.

30. Biblin AM, Akhmatdinov RR, Varfolomeeva KV, Repin LV. Problems of risk communication on radiation safety. analysis of materials on the internet after the 2013 radiation accident at the Electrostal heavy engineering works. Radiatsionnaya Gygiena = Radiation Hygiene. 2018;11(1): 43–52. (In Russian). DOI: 10.21514/1998-426X-2018-11-1-43-52.


Review

For citations:


Ramzaev V.P., Barkovsky A.N. Measurement of effective activity concentration of natural radionuclides insitu for assessment of ambient dose equivalent rate in urban environments. Radiatsionnaya Gygiena = Radiation Hygiene. 2025;18(2):109-121. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.21514/1998-426X-2025-18-2-109-121

Views: 30


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 1998-426X (Print)
ISSN 2409-9082 (Online)