Optimization of radiation protection in radionuclide therapy: Proposals for developing quality assurance programs
https://doi.org/10.21514/1998-426X-2025-18-2-122-130
Abstract
In order to ensure a high-quality and safe therapeutic process in radionuclide therapy, it is not sufficient to rely solely on safety monitoring within the framework of production control. Measures must be implemented within a quality assurance system as established in the quality assurance program. The purpose of this work is to define the requirements for quality assurance program in radionuclide therapy in terms of the ensuring radiation safety for patients, staff, the public, and the environment. The work discusses approaches to developing a quality assurance program in radionuclide therapy as a tool for optimizing radiation protection for patients, medical staff, and the public. The proposed structure of the quality assurance program covers all stages of radionuclide therapy – from patient identification and radiopharmaceutical quality control to the evaluation of therapeutic efficacy and safety at all levels. Particular attention is given to the need for equipment monitoring, imaging parameter control, management of biological waste, patient instruction upon discharge, as well as dosimetry-guided radionuclide therapy planning aimed at optimizing patient radiation protection. The quality assurance program in radionuclide therapy is proposed as a foundation for building a standardized, safe, and effective quality assurance system aligned with international practices, with a primary focus on personalized approaches to the planning and delivery of radionuclide therapy.
Keywords
About the Authors
A. V. LikhachevaRussian Federation
Anastasia V. Likhacheva – Acting Junior Researcher; Radiation Safety Engineer
Mira Str., 8, Saint-Petersburg, 197101
A. V. Vodovatov
Russian Federation
Aleksandr V. Vodovatov – Candidate of Biological Sciences, Head of Laboratory; Docent
Saint Petersburg
L. A. Chipiga
Russian Federation
Larisa A. Chipiga – Candidate of Engineering Sciences, Research Fellow; Docent
Saint Petersburg
References
1. International Atomic Energy Agency, Dosimetry for Radiopharmaceutical Therapy, Non-serial Publications, IAEA, Vienna; 2024. P. 150. DOI: 10.61092/iaea.xlzb-6h67.
2. European Association of Nuclear Medicine, Radionuclide therapy management. EANM Technologists’ guide. Vienna: EANM; 2022. DOI: 10.52717/CUUN1001.
3. ICRP. Radiological Protection in Medicine. ICRP Publication 105. Annals of the ICRP. 2007;37(6).
4. International Atomic Energy Agency; Radiation Protection and Safety in Medical Uses of Ionizing Radiation, IAEA Safety Standards Series No. SSG-46; 2018.
5. Vyas M, Tafti D. Nuclear Medicine Quality Assurance. In: StatPearls [Internet]. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing; 2025 Jan-. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK576382/ (Accessed: 04.04.2025).
6. European Association of Nuclear Medicine. EANM Technologists Guide. Quality Control of Nuclear Medicine Instrumentation and Protocol Standardisation. Vienna: EANM; 2017.
7. International Atomic Energy Agency, Quality Assurance for PET and PET/CT Systems, IAEA Human Health Series No. 1, IAEA, Vienna; 2009.
8. World Health Organization. Quality Assurance in Nuclear Medicine. World Health Organization guide. Geneva: WHO;1982. P. 72.
9. Ramonaheng K, van Staden JA, du Raan H. The effect of calibration factors and recovery coefficients on 177Lu SPECT activity quantification accuracy: a Monte Carlo study. European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging. 2021;8(1): 27. DOI: 10.1186/s40658-021-00365-8.
10. Chipiga LA, Vodovatov AV, Kataeva GV, Ryzhkova DV, Dolgushin MB, Menkov MA, et al. Proposals of Quality Assurance in Positron Emission Tomography in Russia. Meditsinskaya fizika = Medical Physics. 2019;82(2): 78–92. (In Russian).
11. Petryakova AV, Chipiga LA, Vodovatov AV, Smolyarchuk MYa. Equipment quality control during patient radiation protection optimisation in radionuclide diagnostics. Radiatsionnaya Gygiena = Radiation Hygiene. 2023;16(3): 81-90. (In Russian) DOI: 10.21514/1998-426X-2023-16-3-81-90.
12. Chipiga LA, Zvonova IA, Vodovatov AV, Petryakova AV, Stanzhevsky AA, Vazhenina DA, et al. Improvement of the approach to definition of patient release criteria after radionuclide therapy. Radiatsionnaya Gygiena = Radiation Hygiene. 2023;16(2): 19-31. (In Russian) DOI: 10.21514/1998-426X-2023-16-2-19-31.
13. Chipiga L, Likhacheva A, Vodovatov A, Zvonova I, Stanzhevsky A, Vazhenina D, et al. Harmonization of practice of release of patients after radiopharmaceutical therapy. Journal of Radiological Protection. 2025;45(1). DOI: 10.1088/1361-6498/adba70.
14. Sgouros G, Hobbs RF. Dosimetry for radiopharmaceutical therapy. Seminars in Nuclear Medicine. 2014;44(3): 172- 178. DOI: 10.1053/j.semnuclmed.2014.03.007.
15. Stanzhevsky AA, Maistrenko DN, Vazhenina DA, Sysoev DS, Vodovatov AV, Chipiga LA, et al. Methods of dosimetry-based treatment planning in radiopharmaceutical therapy. Part 2: Planning levels. Diagnostic radiology and radiotherapy. 2022;13(4): 16-26. (In Russian) DOI: 10.22328/2079-5343-2022-13-4-16-26.
16. Chipiga LA, Vodovatov AV, Petryakova AV, Zvonova IA, Stanzhevsky AA, Maystrenko DN, et al. Justification of differential approach to management of patient biological waste in nuclear medicine departments. Radiatsionnaya Gygiena = Radiation Hygiene. 2022;15(4): 34-44. (In Russian) DOI: 10.21514/1998-426X-2022-15-4-34-44.
17. Chipiga LA, Vodovatov AV, Zvonova IA, Stanzhevsky AA, Petryakova AV, Anokina EE, et al. Management of biological waste of patients after radionuclide therapy. Radiatsionnaya Gygiena = Radiation Hygiene. 2022;15(2): 19-30. (In Russian) DOI: 10.21514/1998-426X-2022-15-2-19-30.
18. Chipiga LA, Petryakova AV, Vodovatov AV, Saprykin KS, Vazhenina DA, Stanzhevsky AA, et al. Estimation of 223Ra in a sewage system of hospital during radiopharmaceutical therapy with 223Ra dichloride (Xofigo®). Cancer Urology. 2024;20(3): 94-103. (In Russian) DOI: 10.17650/1726-9776-2024-20-3-94-103.
19. Sgouros G, Bolch WE, Chiti A, Dewaraja YK, Emfietzoglou D, Hobbs RF, et al. ICRU REPORT 96, Dosimetry-Guided Radiopharmaceutical Therapy. Journal of the ICRU. 2021;21(1): 1-212.
20. Stanzhevsky AA, Maystrenko DN, Vazhenina DA, Sysoev DS, Vodovatov AV, Chipiga LA, et al. Methods of dosimetry-based treatment planning in radiopharmaceutical therapy. Part 2: Planning levels. Diagnostic radiology and radiotherapy. 2022;13(4): 16-26. (In Russian) DOI: 10.22328/2079-5343-2022-13-4-16-26.
21. Petrova AE, Chipiga LA, Vodovatov AV, Stanzhevsky AA, Maystrenko DN, Lumpov AA, et al. Estimation of absorbed doses in patients’ organs from the released radionuclidelabel during radionuclide therapy with 225Ac. Radiatsionnaya Gygiena = Radiation Hygiene. 2022;15(1): 120-131. (In Russian) DOI: 10.21514/1998-426X-2022-15-1-120-131.
22. Chipiga LA, Petrova AE, Vodovatov AV, Stanzhevsky AA, Lumpov AA, Lavreshov DD, et al. Patient organ and effective dose estimation in radionuclide therapy with 223Ra -dichloride. Radiatsionnaya Gygiena = Radiation Hygiene. 2020;13(4): 6- 16. (In Russian) DOI: 10.21514/1998-426X-2020-13-4-6-16.
Review
For citations:
Likhacheva A.V., Vodovatov A.V., Chipiga L.A. Optimization of radiation protection in radionuclide therapy: Proposals for developing quality assurance programs. Radiatsionnaya Gygiena = Radiation Hygiene. 2025;18(2):122-130. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.21514/1998-426X-2025-18-2-122-130