Risk-communication issues in radiation safety: Mass consciousness about radiation and nuclear industry based on the results of a sociological research in St. Petersburg, the Leningrad region and the Murmansk region
https://doi.org/10.21514/1998-426X-2017-10-3-45-56
Abstract
The study is devoted to a mass reflection of the problems of radiation safety and the functioning of the nuclear industry in the modern Russia. The analysis of the population’s awareness, peculiarities of the perception of radiation risks and the tendencies in the formation of a public assessment of large nuclear projects have been carried out. Materials and Methods: The data were collected during mass surveys of representative samples of the population of two regions located in the Northwest of the Russian Federation: 1) St. Petersburg and the Leningrad region. (2369 respondents, November 2016) and 2) the Murmansk region. (802 respondents May 2017). The results show that radiation is perceived by society as one of the most significant threats to life and health. However, the public concern does not give rise to a mass interest in the thematic information. The real level of knowledge of the population is clearly insufficient for literate actions in an extreme situation, or for the safe behavior in the everyday life. Public opinion is formed mainly on the basis of mass media reports. At the same time, it has been established that groups of the population well informed in the radiation field are much more likely, than others, to support the nuclear industry, including the least popular projects. Conclusion: Therefore, active informing of the population on the issues of the operation of nuclear facilities, the presence of radioactive contamination sites and other sources of danger, etc. objectively contribute to the growth of the industry’s reputation. It is advisable to use social technologies to overcome the cognitive and practical passivity of the Russian citizens and to form the population’s radiation culture.
About the Authors
N. V. SokolovRussian Federation
Nikolay V. Sokolov – Candidate of Sociological Science, assistant professor
For correspondence: Smolnogo str., 1/3, 9th entrance, St. Petersburg, 191124, Russia; E-mail: nvsspb@yandex.ru
A. M. Biblin
Russian Federation
Artem M. Biblin – Junior Researcher
L. V. Repin
Russian Federation
Leonid V. Repin – Information Analytical Center Head
L. S. Rekhtina
Russian Federation
Lyudmila S. Rekhtina – Sociologist
References
1. Biblin A.M. Analysis of the media coverage characteristics on radiation safety issues of the Saint-Petersburg and the Leningrad region population. Radiatsionnaya Gygiena = Radiation hygiene, 2017, Vol. 10, No. 2, pp. 23-30. DOI: 10.21514/1998-426X-2017-10-23-30. p. 25. (In Russian).
2. Arkhangelskaya G.V., Zykova I.A., Zelentsova S.A. The difficulties of informing the population on the issues of radiation protection. Radiatsionnaya Gygiena = Radiation hygiene, 2014, Vol. 7, No. 2, pp. 42-49. (In Russian).
3. Yanitsky O.N. Sociology of risk: key ideas. Mir Rossii = Universe of Russia, 2003, No. 1. (In Russian).
4. Arkhangelskaya G.V., Vainberg A.L., Gubernatorova V.V., Daricheva O.A., Zelentsova S.A., Zykova I.A., Repin V.S., Khramtsov E.V. Subjective assessments of radiation risk on the territories adjacent to the places of peaceful nuclear explosions. Radiatsionnaya Gygiena = Radiation Hygiene, 2009; 2(2):34-39. (In Russian).
5. Arkhangelskaya G.V., Zelentsova S.A., Zykova I.A., Ramzaev V.P., Khrаmtsov E.V. Issues of informing the general public about consequences of peaceful nuclear explosions. Radiatsionnaya Gygiena = Radiation Hygiene, 2011; 4(1):2026. (In Russian).
6. Zykova I. A., Zelentsova S.A., Arkhangelskaya G.V. Information requirements of population in different radiation-hygienic situations. Radiatsionnaya Gygiena = Radiation hygiene, 2013, Vol. 6, No. 4, pp. 11-18. (In Russian).
7. Zelentsova S.A., Arkhangelskaya G.V., Vishnyakova N.M., Zykova I.A., Repin V.S. Level of knowledge among the population of radiation safety basic issues. Radiatsionnaya Gygiena = Radiation hygiene, 2015, Vol. 8, No. 4, pp. 52-61. (In Russian).
8. Akleyev A.V. Biological Aspects of Radiation Protection. Radiatsiya i risk = Radiation and Risk, 2010, Vol. 19, No 2, pp. 65-76. (In Russian).
9. Tikhonov M.N., Petrov E.L., Muratov O.E. Systemic view of nuclear energy and radiation through the prism of public consciousness. Ecologia promishlennogo proizvodtsva = Ecology of industrial production, 2004, No 2, pp. 2-8 (In Russian).
10. Komarova G. Man and radiation: a study of aspects of people’s lives in conditions of high radiation. Acta Slavica Iaponica, Tomus 23, pp. 124-145. (In Russian).
11. Seong KM, Kwon T, Seo S, Lee D, Park S, Jin YW, et al. (2017) Perception of low dose radiation risks among radiation researchers in Korea. PLoS ONE 12(2): e0171777. – Available on: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0171777. Accessed: August 08, 2017).
12. Shlykova E. V. Adaptation Profile social wellbeing of the population in the conditions of imposed risk. Izvestiya TulGU. Gumanitarnye nauki = Proceedings of the TSU. Liberal arts, Vol. 1, Tula, 2017, pp. 114-126. (In Russian).
13. Miura M., Ono K., Yamauchi M., Matsuda N. Perception of radiation risk by Japanese radiation specialists evaluated as a safe dose before the Fukushima nuclear accident Health Physics Volume 110, Issue 6, 1 June 2016, Pages 558-562 DOI: 10.1097/HP.0000000000000486.
14. Turcanu C.O., El Jammal M.-H., Perko T., Baumont G., Latré E., Choffel De Witte I. Satisfaction with information about ionising radiation: A comparative study in Belgium and France Journal of Radiological ProtectionVolume 36, Issue 2, June 2016, Pages 122-142 DOI: 10.1088/0952-4746/36/2/S122.
15. Semenov S.V. Ionizing radiation in our life. Energobezopasnost i okhrana truda = Energy security and occupational safety, 2009, No 2 (26), pp. 3-12. (In Russian).
16. Barkovsky A.N., Akhmatdinov R.R., Baryshkov N.K., Bratilova A.A., Kormanovskaya T.A., Kuvshinnikov S.I., Repin L.V., Stamat I.P., Tutelyan O.E. The outcomes of functioning of the Unified System of Individual Dose Control of the Russian Federation Citizens based on the 2015 data. Radiatsionnaya Gygiena = Radiation Hygiene, 2016; 9(4):47-73. (In Russian).
17. Repin V.S., Baryshkov N.K., Bratilova A.A., Varfolomeeva K.V., Goncharova Yu.N., Kononenko D.V., Kormanovskaya T.A., Repin L.V., Romanovich I.K., Svetovidov A.V., Stamat I.P. Kuvshinnikov S.I., Matyukhin S.V., Stepanov V.S., Tutelyan O.E. Information packet: Radiation exposure doses of the population of the Russian Federation according to the results of the USIDC in 2002-2015, Saint-Petersburg, 2015, 40 p. (In Russian).
18. Repin V.S., Baryshkov N.K., Bratilova A.A., Varfolomeeva K.V., Goncharova Yu.N., Kononenko D.V., Kormanovskaya T.A., Kuvshinnikov S.I., Repin L.V., Romanovich I.K., Svetovidov A.V., Stamat I.P., Tutelyan O.E. The outcomes of the functioning of Unified System of Individual Dose Control of the Russian Federation Citizens based on 2014 data. Radiatsionnaya gygiena = Radiation Hygiene, 2015, Vol. 8, № 3, pp. 86-115. (In Russian).
19. Kanda, R. Tsuji, S.,Yonehara, H. Perceived risk of nuclear power and other risks during the last 25 years in Japan Health Physics Volume 102, Issue 4, April 2012, Pages 384-390 DOI: 10.1097/HP.0b013e31823abef2.
Review
For citations:
Sokolov N.V., Biblin A.M., Repin L.V., Rekhtina L.S. Risk-communication issues in radiation safety: Mass consciousness about radiation and nuclear industry based on the results of a sociological research in St. Petersburg, the Leningrad region and the Murmansk region. Radiatsionnaya Gygiena = Radiation Hygiene. 2017;10(3):45-56. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.21514/1998-426X-2017-10-3-45-56