Occupational and Public Exposure During Normal Operation of Radioactive Waste Disposal Facilities

This paper focuses on occupational and public exposure during operation of disposal facilities receiving liquid and solid radioactive waste of various classes and provides a comparative analysis of the relevant doses: actual and calculated at the design stage. Occupational and public exposure study presented in this paper covers normal operations of a radioactive waste disposal facility receiving waste. Results: Analysis of individual and collective occupational doses was performed based on data collected during operation of near-surface disposal facilities for short-lived intermediate-, lowand very low-level waste in France, as well as nearsurface disposal facilities for long-lived waste in Russia. Further analysis of occupational and public doses calculated at the design stage was completed covering a near-surface disposal facility in Belgium and deep disposal facilities in the United Kingdom and the Nizhne-Kansk rock massive (Russia). The results show that engineering and technical solutions enable almost complete elimination of internal occupational exposure, whereas external exposure doses would fall within the range of values typical for a basic nuclear facility. Conclusion: radioactive waste disposal facilities being developed, constructed and operated meet the safety requirements effective in the Russian Federation and consistent with relevant international recommendations. It has been found that individual occupational exposure doses commensurate with those received by personnel of similar facilities abroad. Furthermore, according to the forecasts, mean individual doses for personnel during radioactive waste disposal would be an order of magnitude lower than the dose limit of 20 mSv/year. As for the public exposure, during normal operation, potential impact is virtually impossible by delaminating boundaries of a nuclear facility sanitary protection zone inside which the disposal facility is located and can be solely attributed to the use of public roads during radioactive waste transportation to the disposal facility site. 

1. IAEA SF-1. Fundamental Safety Principles. – Vienna, 2006.

2. Linge I.I., Utkin S.S., Khamaza A.A., Sharafutdinov R.B. Atomic Experience in Applying the International Requirements for the Validation of Long-Time Safety of Radwaste Disposal Sites: Problems and Lessons. Atomnaya energiya = Atomic Energy, 2016, Vol. 120, № 4, pp. 201-208. (In Russian).

3. Laverov N.P., Velichkin V.I., Omelyanenko B.I. [et al.] Isolation of spent nuclear fuel: geological and chemical basis. IGEM RAS, Moscow, 2008. (In Russian).

4. Kapyrin I.V., Utkin S.S., Vasilevsky Yu.V. Concept of the design and application of the GeRa numerical code for radioactive waste disposal safety assessment. Atomic Science and Engineering. Series: Mathematical modeling and simulation of physical processes, 2014, Vol. 4, pp. 44-54. (In Russian).

5. Non-retrievable radioactive waste. Under the general editorship of Linge I.I., 2015, 240 p. (In Russian).

6. Linge I.I., Savkin M.N., Vedernikova M.V. Management of special radioactive wastes: practical advances and current challenges. Radiatsionnaya gygiena = Radiation Hygiene, 2014, Vol. 7, № 4, pp. 23-37. (In Russian).

7. MicroShield Version 5.05. User’s Manual. Grove Engineering. Rockville MA, 1999.

8. ICRP. Conversion Coefficients for use in Radiological Protection against External Radiation. ICRP, 1996. Publication 74, Ann. ICRP 26 (3-4).

9. TECDOC-1449. Radiological aspects of non-fixed contamination of packages and conveyances. IAEA, Vienna, 2005.

10. Bakin R.I., Zvantsev A.A., Ilupin S.I., [et al.] Software system for express computation of photon radiation doses outside the shields of the sources of different geometric forms. Izvestiya Akademii nauk Energetika = Bulletin of the Russian Academy of Sciences, 2013, No 5, pp. 129-135 (In Russian).

11. Monitoring of individual effective and equivalent doses and dose management of occupational exposure. General requirements. MU 2.6.1.016-2000, M., 2000. (In Russian).

12. ICRP. Assessing Dose of the Representative Person for the Purpose of the Radiation Protection of the Public. ICRP, 2006. Publication 101a. Ann. ICRP 36 (3).

13. ANDRA. Rapport Annuel 2015 d’information sur la surete nucleaire et la radioprotection. Centre de stockage de l’Aube. ANDRA, 2015.

14. ANDRA. Rapport Annuel 2015. Centre Industriel de Regroupement, d’Entreposage et de Stockage. ANDRA, 2015.

15. ONDRAF NIRAS. Summary of the Safety Report for the Surface Repository of Category A Waste in Dessel. ONDRAF NIRAS, 2012. NIROND-TR 2012-17 E.

16. NDA. Geological Disposal, Generic Operational Safety Assessment: Volume 2 – Normal Operations Operator dose assessment. NDA, 2010. NDA Report no. NDA/RWMD/026.

17. Underground research laboratory in Nizhnekanskiy massive. – Available on: http://www.norao.ru/about/underground/ (Accessed: August 01, 2017). (In Russian).

18. Rybalchenko A.I., Pimenov M.K., Kostin P.P. [et.al.] Geological disposal of liquid radioactive waste. Moscow, IzdAt, 1994, 254 p. (In Russian).

19. Rybalchenko A.I., Kurochkin V.M. 50 years experience of geological disposal of liquid radioactive waste: practical and scientific results. Geoekologiya, inzhenernaya geologiya, gidrogeologiya, geokriologiya = Geology, engineer geology, hydrogeology, geocriology, 2014, No 1, pp. 86-90.(In Russian).

20. Polygon for radioactive waste disposal starts its operation in Ural. – Available on: http://www.atomic-energy.ru/news/2017/01/11/65483 (Accessed: August 01, 2017). (In Russian).

21. Annual report on ecological safety. FGUP “NO RAO”. Moscow, 2015. – Available on: http://norao.ru/upload/catalog_NORAO_200x200%20(2).pdf (Accessed: August 01, 2017). (In Russian).

22. Batters S. Generic Transportation Dose Assessment. Batters S. NWMO, 2012, TR-2012-06.

23. Report on the environmental safety of Zheleznogorsk branch of «NO RWM» and «GKhK» for 2016. – Available on: http://bezrao.ru/n/1163 (Accessed: August 01, 2017). (In Russian).