RISK-COMMUNICATION ISSUES IN RADIATION SAFETY: PREFERENCES OF THE PUBLIC IN THE LENINGRAD AND MURMANSK REGIONS ON THE SOURCES OF INFORMATION

A survey of the population of the Leningrad and Murmansk regions was conducted in 2016–2017. The survey was devoted to the study of preferred sources of information on radiation safety. The sample size in the Leningrad region was 962 respondents, and in the Murmansk region – 802 respondents. It was found that less than 30% of respondents living in the Leningrad and Murmansk regions show interest in obtaining information on radiation safety. The respondents noted the greatest importance in obtaining information on three topics: «the effect of radiation on the body and the impact on health», «radiation protection measures available at the place of residence», and «dangerous and safe radiation levels». The possibility of obtaining accessible and regular information about the radiation situation in the place of residence is in demand among approximately 45% of respondents in the Leningrad region and 37% in the Murmansk region. Television, Internet and the SMS alerts were most often chosen by respondents as the most appropriate source of such information. With age, the proportion of users of traditional media, especially television, is increasing, among women slightly more than among men. The population revealed distrust of the media as sources of information about the radiation situation and safety, the confidence index for all types of media is negative. In the Murmansk region, the index of confidence in the media is lower than that in the Leningrad region. Among all types of mass media, TV has the greatest confidence in the population. On the Internet, the official websites of Rospotrebnadzor and Rosatom, as well as the official websites of local authorities in the Leningrad region, which have positive trust index, have the greatest confidence in the population. Search services, blogs, social networks, media sites, and official sites of local authorities in the Murmansk region have negative confidence index. More than a half of the population considers the inclusion of special training programs in the system of secondary and higher education to be the most effective method of improving environmental literacy. The following methods of educational work are also in demand: lectures and seminars with the participation of specialists and watching videos.

1. Romanovich I.K., Balonov M.I., Barkovsky A.N. [et al.] Fukushima-1 NPP accident: management of the prophylactic activities, focused on the preservation of the health of the public in the Russian Federation. Ed. G.G. Onishchenko. Saint-Petersburg, Institute of radiation hygiene after P.V. Ramzaev, 2012, 336 p. (In Russian)

2. Arkhangelskaya G.V., Zykova I.A., Vishnyakova N.M. Socialpsychological aspects of the protection of the public. Ed.: G.G. Onishchenko and A.Yu. Popova. Radiation-hygienic aspects of the negotiation of the consequences of the Chernobyl NPP accident. Volume 1. Saint-Petersburg, Institute of radiation hygiene after P.V. Ramzaev, 2016, Vol. 1, pp. 352-388. (In Russian)

3. Arkhangelskaya G.V., Zelentsova S.A., Vishnyakova N.M., Khramtsov E.V., Varfolomeeva K.V., Sokolov N.V., Repin V.S. Risk-communication issues in radiation safety: Evaluation of public awareness in St. Petersburg and the Leningrad Region on the activities of the nuclear industry and public understanding of the hazards. Radiatsionnaya Gygiena = Radiation Hygiene, 2017, Vol. 10, No. 3, pp. 3645. – Available on: http://elibrary.ru/contents.asp?issueid=869056&selid=15181745 (Accessed: April 15, 2018) (In Russian)

4. Arkhangelskaya G.V., Zelentsova S.A., Zykova I.A., Ramzaev V.P., Khramtsov E.V. Issues of informing the general public about consequences of peacefull nuclear explosions. Radiatsionnaya Gygiena = Radiation Hygiene, 2015, Vol. 4, No. 1, pp. 20-26. (In Russian)

5. Arkhangelskaya G.V., Zykova I.A. Monitoring of the socialpsychological effects of the public in the radioactivecontaminated territories. A guidance for the physicians. Approved by the Ministry of Healthcare of the Russian Federation, July 1999. Institute of radiation hygiene after P.V. Ramzaev, 1999, 28 p. (In Russian)

6. Zykova I.A., Arkhangelskaya G.V. Radiation anxiety of the public of the contaminated areas and actions to lower it. A guidance for the specialists of Rosptrebnadzor. Approved by the director of Institute of radiation hygiene after P.V. Ramzaev, 2007, 24 p. (In Russian)

7. Zykova I.A., Arkhangelskaya G.V., Khramtsov E.V. Socialpsychological consequences of the major radiation accidents. A guidance for the physicians. Approved by the Ministry of Healthcare of the Russian Federation. Institute of radiation hygiene after P.V. Ramzaev, 2002, 32 p. (In Russian)

8. Arkhangelskaya G.V., Zykova I.A., Zelentsova S.A. The difficulties of informing the population on the issues of radiation protection. Radiatsionnaya Gygiena = Radiation Hygiene, 2015, Т. 7, No. 2, pp. 42-49. (In Russian)

9. Covello, V.T., Wasshington, D.C. Risk communication, risk statistics and risk comparisons: A manual for plant manager. Chemical Manufactures Association; 1988.

10. Kasperson, R.E. The Social Amplification of Risk: A Conceptual Framework. Risk Analysis, 1988, V. 8, pp. 177–187.

11. Baker, F. Risk Communication about environmental hazards. Journ. publ . Health Policy, 1990, V. 11, № 3, pp. 341–359.

12. Communicating Radiation Risks. United States Environmental Protection Agency, 2008, 80 p.

13. Zykova I.A., Garbuz Yu.A., Zelentsova S.A., Romanova O.B. Analysis of media publications on the Fukushima nuclear power plant accident. Radiatsionnaya Gygiena = Radiation Hygiene, 2011, Vol. 4, No. 3, pp. 43-49. (In Russian)

14. Biblin A.M. Analysis of the media coverage characteristics on radiation safety issues of the Saint-Petersburg and the Leningrad region population. Radiatsionnaya Gygiena = Radiation Hygiene, 2017, Vol. 10, No. 2, pp. 23-30. (In Russian)

15. Sokolov N.V., Biblin A.M., Repin L.V., Rekhtina L.S. Risk-communication issues in radiation safety: Mass consciousness about radiation and nuclear industry based on the results of a sociological research in St. Petersburg, the Leningrad region and the Murmansk region. Radiatsionnaya Gygiena = Radiation Hygiene, 2017, Vol. 10, No. 3, pp. 4556. (In Russian)

16. Biblin A.M., Vishnyakova N.M., Varfolomeeva K.V., Zelentsova S.A., Khramtsov E.V., Akhmatdinov R.R. Problems of risk communication: non-governmental organizations and their role in the development of the public opinion on issues of population’s radiation protection. Radiatsionnaya Gygiena = Radiation Hygiene, 2018, Vol. 11, No. 1, pp. 101-112. (In Russian)

17. Biblin A.M., Akhmatdinov R.R Risk-communication as a part of the provision of the radiation safety: a trust of the public to the internet as a source of the information on the radiations situation. Fundamental and applicable aspects of the analysis of the public health risks. Ed: A.Yu. Popova, N.V. Zaytseva. Proceedings of the all-Russian scientific-practical internet-conference of the young scientists and specialists of Rospotrebnadzor. Perm national research polytechnical university, 2017, pp. 263-274. (In Russian)

18. Public opinion 2016. Moscow, Levada -center, 2017, 272 p. (In Russian)

19. News on the digital competence, or the Russian people get along with the internet. – Available on: https://wciom.ru/index.php?id=236&uid=115657 (Accessed: April 16, 2018). (In Russian)

20. Life in the internet and without it. – Available on: https://wciom.ru/index.php?id=236&uid=116780 (Accessed: April 16, 2018). (In Russian)