Preview

Radiatsionnaya Gygiena = Radiation Hygiene

Advanced search

Development of the model of radiation risk-communication with the public for the arrangement of the research

https://doi.org/10.21514/1998-426X-2019-12-1-74-84

Abstract

The aim of the study was to justify and develop a model of risk communication with the public on radiation protection issues and to conduct research based on it in St. Petersburg and the Leningrad Region. The proposed model of risk communication consists of five continuously and cyclically alternating each other stages: 1) scientific research; 2) a scientifically based system of practical measures; 3) a regional risk communication program on the radiation protection of the public; 4) practical arrangements for the implementation of the program; 5) research to assess the effectiveness of risk communication. Four sets of questions to be answered in the framework of scientific research were identified: 1) the characteristics of the radiation-hygienic environment; 2) the demographic situation and the state of health of the public; 3) attitudes of the participants of the risk information field; 4) information field characteristic. The results obtained through the  research allowed substantiating the system of practical measures: 1) to determine the directions of risk communication, 2) to assess the need for developing local programs within the framework of regional ones; 3) to assess the level of knowledge and perceptions of the public about possible sources of radiation risk; 4) to identify stakeholders in risk communication; 5) to determine the types and list of information materials and information resources that are optimal for different groups of stakeholders. The conducted studies indicate that the radiation situation in St. Petersburg and the Leningrad Region is stable. These regions contain all exposure situations that require the development of local risk communication programs. p Several differences were revealed in health indicators of the public in St-Petersburg and the Leningrad region. Public knowledge on radiation protection issues can be characterized as fragmented and uncertain. The preferred source of information for the public is the Internet. Among all sources of information, unconditional leaders in the level of public confidence are the employees of the Ministry of Emergency Situations, scientists and specialists. More than half of the respondents in St-Petersburg and the Leningrad Region (73% and 60% respectively) had no  information about key public organizations covering issues of the radiation protection of the public, which indicates a rather low effectiveness of the activity of these public organizations. Both in all and in certain categories of mass media, a significant part (more than 50%) are publications with a neutral presentation of information. Only the media of the city of Sosnovy Bor is characterized by the active involvement of specialists in the radiation safety of the public in the preparation of information materials. 

About the Author

A. M. Biblin
Saint-Petersburg Research Institute of Radiation Hygiene after Professor P.V. Ramzaev, Federal Service for Surveillance on Consumer Rights and Human Well-Being
Russian Federation

Head, Information Analytical Center

Mira Str., 8, Saint-Petersburg, 197101, Russia



References

1. Radiation safety standards (RSS-99/2009). Sanitaryepidemiological rules and standards. SP2.6.1.252309. Moscow, Federal Center of Hygiene and Epidemiology of Rospotrebnadzor, 2009, 100 p. (In Russian).

2. Onischenko G.G., Zaytseva N.V., May I.V. [et al.] Health risk analysis in the strategy of state social and economic development: monograph. In: G.G. Onischenko, N.V. Zaitseva eds. Perm, Publishing house of Perm National Research Polytechnic University, 2014, 783 p. (in Russian).

3. Guidelines for health risk assessment of exposure to chemical substances polluting the environment R 2.1.10.1920–04. Federal center of Gossanepidnadzor of the Ministry of Health of Russia, 2004, 143 p. (In Russian).

4. Barg A.O., Lebedeva-Nesevrya N.A. Risk-communication is an effective way of producing the cumulative acceptability of human health risks. Zdorovie naseleniya i sreda obitaniya = Population Health and Life Environment, 2014, V. 261, № 12, pp. 9-11. (In Russian).

5. Lebedeva-Nesevrya N.A. Risk-communications as an instrument for public health management. Analiz riska zdorovyu = Health Risk analysis, 2014, № 2, pp. 83-99. (In Russian).

6. Perko T. Risk communication in the case of the Fukushima accident: impact of communication and lessons to be learned. Integrated Environmental Assessment and Management, 12(4), pp. 683–686.

7. Ng K. H., Lean M. L. The Fukushima nuclear crisis reemphasizes the need for improved risk communication and better use of social media. Health physics, 2012, Vol. 103, №. 3, pp. 307-310.

8. Zykova I.A., Garbuz Yu.A., Zelentsova S.A., Romanova O.B. Analysis of media publications on the Fukushima nuclear power plant accident. Radiatsionnaya gygiena = Radiation Hygiene, 2011, Vol. 4, No 3, pp. 43-49. (In Russian)

9. Melikhova E.M., Byrkina E.M., Pershina Yu.A. On the Issue of Certain Mechanisms of Social Amplification of Risk in Media Coverage of the Fukushima NPP Nuclear Accident. Meditsinskaya radiologiya i radiatsionnaya bezopasnost = Medical Radiology and Radiation Safety, 2013, Vol. 58, № 4, pp. 5-16. (In Russian)

10. Romanovich I.K. [et al.] The accident at the «Fukushima-1» NPP: the preventive measures organization aimed at the preservation of the Russian Federation public health. Ed.: G.G. Onischenko. St. Petersburg., Research Institute of Radiation Hygiene after Professor P. V. Ramzaev, 2012, 336 p. (In Russian).

11. Covello, V.; Sandman, P.M. Risk communication: Evolution and Revolution. In: A. Wolbarst (ed.), Solutions to an Environment in Peril. Baltimore: John Hopkins University Press, 2001, pp. 164–178.

12. Gorsky A.A., Stepanov V.S., Lipatova O.V., Matyukhin S.V., Romanovich I.K., Barkovsky A.N., Baryshkov N.K., Bruk G.Ya., Stamat I.P., Kormanovskaya T.A., Titova T.N., Vereshchagin A.I., Tutelyan O.E., Kuvshinnikov S.I., Rusanovskaya E.V. [et al.]. Results of radiation-hygienic passportization for 2012 (Radiation-Hygienic Passport of the Russian Federation), Moscow, 2013, 130 p. (In Russian)

13. Gorsky A.A., Stepanov V.S., Matyukhin S.V., Romanovich I.K., Barkovsky A.N., Baryshkov N.K., Bruk G.Ya., Stamat I.P., Kormanovskaya T.A., Titova T.N., Vereshchagin A.I., Tutelyan O.E., Kuvshinnikov S.I., Rusanovskaya E.V. [et al.]. Results of radiation-hygienic passportization for 2013 (Radiation-Hygienic Passport of the Russian Federation), Moscow, 2014, 132 p. (In Russian).

14. Popova A.Yu., Bragina I.V., Shevkun I.G., Gorsky A.A., Stepanov V.S., Matyukhin S.V., Romanovich I.K., Barkovsky A.N., Baryshkov N.K., Vorobyev B.F., Stamat I.P., Kormanovskaya T.A., Titova T.N., Sennikova V.G., Tutelyan O.E., Kuvshinnikov S.I., Rusanovskaya E.V. [et al.]. Results of radiation-hygienic passportization for 2014 (Radiation-Hygienic Passport of the Russian Federation), Moscow, 2015, 134 p. (In Russian).

15. Shevkun I.G., Stepanov V.S., Matyukhin S.V., Romanovich I.K., Barkovsky A.N., Baryshkov N.K., Stamat I.P., Kormanovskaya T.A., Titova T.N., Sennikova V.G., Tutelyan O.E., Kuvshinnikov S.I., Rusanovskaya E.V. [et al.]. Results of radiation-hygienic passportization for 2015 (Radiation-Hygienic Passport of the Russian Federation), Moscow, 2016, 125 p. (In Russian).

16. Shevkun I.G., Stepanov V.S., Matyukhin S.V., Romanovich I.K., Barkovsky A.N., Baryshkov N.K., Stamat I.P., Kormanovskaya T.A., Titova T.N., Sennikova V.G., Tutelyan O.E., Kuvshinnikov S.I., Rusanovskaya E.V. [et al.]. Results of radiation-hygienic passportization for 2016 (Radiation-Hygienic Passport of the Russian Federation), Moscow, 2017, 125 p. (In Russian).

17. Baryshkov N.K., Bratilova A.A., Kormanovskaya T.A., Kuvshinnikov S.I., Lipatova O.V., Matyukhin S.V., Repin V.S., Stamat I.P., Stepanov V.S., Tutelyan O.E. Information packet: Radiation exposure doses of the public of the Russian Federation in 2012, Saint-Petersburg, 2013, 67 p. (In Russian).

18. Repin V.S., Baryshkov N.K., Bratilova A.A., Kormanovskaya T.A., Kuvshinnikov S.I., Matyukhin S.V., Stamat I.P., Repin L.V., Akhmatdinov R.R., Stepanov V.S., Tutelyan O.E. Information packet: Radiation exposure doses of the public of the Russian Federation in 2013, Saint-Petersburg, 2014, 60 p. (In Russian).

19. Repin V.S., Baryshkov N.K., Bratilova A.A., Varfolomeeva K.V., Goncharova Yu.N., Kononenko D.V., Kormanovskaya T.A., Repin L.V., Romanovich I.K., Svetovidov A.V., Stamat I.P. Kuvshinnikov S.I., Matyukhin S.V., Stepanov V.S., Tutelyan O.E. Information packet: Radiation exposure doses of the public of the Russian Federation according to the results of the USIDC in 2002-2015, Saint-Petersburg, 2015, 40 p. (In Russian).

20. Barkovsky A.N., Baryshkov N.K., Bratilova A.A., Kormanovskaya T.A., Repin L.V., Romanovich I.K., Stepanov V.S., Titova T.N. Information packet: Radiation exposure doses of the public of the Russian Federation in 2015, Saint-Petersburg, 2016, 72 p. (In Russian).

21. Barkovsky A.N., Baryshkov N.K., Bratilova A.A., Kormanovskaya T.A., Repin L.V., Romanovich I.K., Stepanov V.S., Titova T.N. Information packet: Radiation exposure doses of the public of the Russian Federation in 2016, Saint Petersburg, 2017, 78 p. (In Russian).

22. Kaprin A.D., Starinsky V.V., Petrova G.V., eds. Malignant neoplasms in Russia in 2012 (morbidity and mortality). Мoscow, Federal State Budget Institution Moscow Research Institute of Oncology named after P.A. Herzen Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation, 2014, 250 p. (in Russian).

23. Kaprin A.D., Starinsky V.V., Petrova G.V., eds. Malignant neoplasms in Russia in 2013 (morbidity and mortality). Мoscow, Federal State Budget Institution Moscow Research Institute of Oncology named after P.A. Herzen Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation, 2015, 250 p. (in Russian).

24. Kaprin A.D., Starinsky V.V., Petrova G.V., eds. Malignant neoplasms in Russia in 2014 (morbidity and mortality). Мoscow, Federal State Budget Institution Moscow Research Institute of Oncology named after P.A. Herzen Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation, 2016, 250 p. (in Russian).

25. Kaprin A.D., Starinsky V.V., Petrova G.V., eds. Malignant neoplasms in Russia in 2015 (morbidity and mortality). Мoscow, Federal State Budget Institution Moscow Research Institute of Oncology named after P.A. Herzen Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation, 2017, 250 p. (in Russian).

26. Kaprin A.D., Starinsky V.V., Petrova G.V., eds. Malignant neoplasms in Russia in 2016 (morbidity and mortality). Мoscow, Federal State Budget Institution Moscow Research Institute of Oncology named after P.A. Herzen Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation, 2018, 250 p. (in Russian).

27. Key indicators of demographic processes in St. Petersburg in 2016. Statistical compendium. Petrostat, St. Petersburg, 2017, 88 p. (in Russian).

28. Key indicators of demographic processes in Leningrad region in 2016. Statistical compendium. Petrostat, St. Petersburg, 2017, 98 p. (in Russian).

29. Merabishvili V.M. Malignant tumors in the North-West Federal Region of Russia (morbidity, mortality, prevalence rate, survival). Express information. Issue three. St. Petersburg, 2017, 282 p. (in Russian).

30. Bruk G.Ya., Bazyukin A.B., Bratilova A.A., Istorik O.A., Eremina L.A. Radiation situation on the territories of the Leningrad Region affected by the Chernobyl accident. Radiatsionnaya Gygiena = Radiation Hygiene, 2017, Vol. 10, №3, pp. 103-112. (In Russian) https://doi.org/10.21514/1998-426X-2017-10-3-103-112.

31. Sokolov N.V., Biblin A.M., Repin L.V., Rekhtina L.S. Risk communication issues in radiation safety: Mass consciousness about radiation and nuclear industry based on the results of a sociological research in St. Petersburg, the Leningrad region and the Murmansk region. Radiatsionnaya gygiena = Radiation Hygiene, 2017, Vol. 10, № 3, pp. 45- 56. (In Russian).

32. Arkhangelskaya G.V., Zelentsova S.A., Vishnyakova N.M., Khramtsov E.V., Varfolomeeva K.V., Sokolov N.V., Repin V.S. Risk-communication issues in radiation safety: evaluation of public awareness in St. Petersburg and the Leningrad region on the activities of the nuclear industry and public understanding of the hazards. Radiatsionnaya gygiena = Radiation Hygiene, 2017, Vol. 10, № 3, pp. 36-45. (In Russian).

33. Biblin A.M., Akhmatdinov R.R. Risk communication in ensuring radiation safety: public confidence in the Internet as a source of information on radiation conditions. In: A.Yu. Popova, N.V. Zaitseva eds. Perm, 2017, pp. 263–274 (in Russian).

34. Biblin A.M., Vishnyakova N.M., Varfolomeeva K.V., Zelentsova S.A., Khramtsov E.V., Akhmatdinov R.R. Problems of risk communication: non-governmental organizations and their role in the development of the public opinion on issues of population’s radiation protection. Radiatsionnaya Gygiena = Radiation Hygiene, 2018, Vol. 11, № 1, pp. 101-112. https://doi.org/10.21514/1998-426X-2018-11-1-101-112.

35. Biblin A.M. Analysis of the media coverage characteristics on radiation safety issues of the Saint-Petersburg and the Leningrad region population. Radiatsionnaya Gygiena = Radiation hygiene, 2017, Vol. 10, No. 2, pp. 23-30. (In Russian).


Review

For citations:


Biblin A.M. Development of the model of radiation risk-communication with the public for the arrangement of the research. Radiatsionnaya Gygiena = Radiation Hygiene. 2019;12(1):74-84. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.21514/1998-426X-2019-12-1-74-84

Views: 1062


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 1998-426X (Print)
ISSN 2409-9082 (Online)