A new approach to the problem of assessing the radon hazard of building sites

Radon and its daughter products create more than half dose from all natural radiation sources. The radon entering the buildings is emitted mainly from soils lying at the base of the foundation. Therefore, before carrying out construction work, the radon hazard of the construction area are determined. In the Russian Federation, the radon hazard of an area can be determined using radon flux density measured on the soil surface. To date, radon researchers came to the conclusion that the geology of the territory affects the amount of radon released from the soil surface. However, there are almost no studies devoted to the release of radon from the surface of various soil types. The paper presents the measuring results of the radon flux density on the surface of loess loams, porcelain clay, argillaceous slate, sand-and-gravel sediment, rocky limestone, clayey limestone, andesite-basalt porphyrite and quartzrock. The measurements were carried out by the accumulation chamber method using the Alfarad Plus measuring complex. Also, measuring radium activity concentration and soil moisture were carried out. The research demonstrates that, depending on the type of soil, the amount of radon emanating from its surface differs by more than an order of magnitude. The largest values of radon flux density of ~ 800 mBq∙m^-2s^-1 were recorded for andesite-basalt porphyrite and quartzrock. The smallest ones of ~ 40 mBq∙m^-2s^-1 were registered for loess loams and argillaceous slates. For soils consisting of small sand and clay grains, a rather strong dependence of the radon flux density on soil moisture was found. When measuring soils with low moisture (2-6%), a proportional dependence of the radium activity concentration on the amount of radon emanating from the soil surface is not observed. The types of soils that lie at the foundations of the buildings, and their physical properties can be used as the basis for classifying building sites according to the degree of radon hazard. Relevant information may be provided by organizations engaged in design and survey work at building plots. The approach proposed in the work for assessing radon hazard will allow avoiding labor-intensive measurements of radon and thereby reduce the financial, material and labor costs of building construction.

1. Ryzhakova NK, Stavitskaya KO, Udalov AA. Issues in assessment of potential radon hazard at building sites. Radiatsionnaya Gygiena = Radiation Hygiene. 2018;11(2) :37-44. (In Russian). DOI:10.21514/1998-426X-2018-11-2-37-44

2. Bannov YuA. Laboratory of radiation control «GEOKON». Two years: work experience. ANRI. 2005;2(41): 54-72 (In Russian)

3. Gruber V, Bossew P, De Cort M, Tollefsen T. The European map of the geogenic radon potential. J. Radiol. Prot. 2013;33(1): 51-60.

4. EPA (US Enviromental Protection Agency) 1993 EPA Map of Radon Zones (Report 402-R-93-071). – Available from: www.epa.gov/radon/zonemap.html [Accessed 28 February 2012]

5. Guida D, Guida M, Cuomo A, Guadagnuolo D, Siervo V. Assessment and Mapping of Radon-prone Areas on a regional scale as application of a Hierarchical Adaptive and Multiscale Approach for the Environmental Planning. Case Study of Campania Region, Southern Italy. WSEAS Transactions on Systems. 2013;12(2): 105-120.

6. İçhedefa М, Saç MM, Camgöz B, Bolca M, Harmanşah Ç. Soil gas radon concentrations measurements in terms of great soil groups. Journal of Environmental Radioactivity. 2013;126: 165-171.

7. Szabó KZ, Jordan G, Horváth Á, Szabó C. Mapping the geogenic radon potential: methodology and spatial analysis for central Hungary. Journal of Environmental Radioactivity. 2014;129: 107–120.

8. Ielsch G, Cushing ME, Combes P, Cuney M. Mapping of the geogenic radon potential in France to improve radon risk management: methodology and first application to region Bourgogne. Journal of Environmental Radioactivity. 2010;101: 813-820.

9. Mazur D, Janik M, Loskiewicz J, Olko P, Swakon J. Measurements of radon concentration in soil gas by CR-39 detectors. Radiation Measurements. 1999;31: 295-300.

10. Winkler R, Ruckerbauer F, Bunzl K. Radon concentration in soil gas: a comparison of the variability resulting from different methods, spatial heterogeneity and seasonal fluctuations. Science of The Total Environment. 2001;272: 273-282.

11. Mohammad AI, Al-Zubaidy NN. Evaluation of radon gas concentration in the air of soil and dwellings of Hawar and Foara villages, using (CR-39) detectors. Radiation Measurements. 2008;43: S452-S455.

12. Jönsson G. Soil radon depth dependence. Radiation Measurements. 2001;34: 415-418.

13. Neznal M, Neznal M. The new method for Assessing the Radon Risk of Building Sites. Czech Geological Survey Special Papers. 2004;16: 7-47.

14. Siehl A, Stegemann R, Valdivia-Manchego M. Mapping the geogenic radon potential in Germany. The Science of the Total Environment. 2001;272: 217-230

15. Kikaj D, Jeran Z, Bahtijari M, Stegnar P. Radon in soil gas in Kosovo. Journal of Environmental Radioactivity. 2016;164: 245-252.

16. Ciotoli G, Voltaggio M, Tuccimei P, Soligo M, Pasculli A, Beaubien SE, et al. Geographically weighted regression and geostatistical techniques to construct the geogenic radon potential map of the Lazio region: A methodological proposal for the European Atlas of Natural Radiation. Journal of Environmental Radioactivity. 2017;166(2): 355-375.

17. Watson Robin J, Smethurst M, Ganerod G, Finne I, Rudjord A. The use of mapped geology as a predictor of radon potential in Norway. Journal of Environmental Radioactivity. 2017;166(2): 341-354.

18. Akerblom G. Investigations and mapping of radon risk areas. Geology for environmental planning, Proceed. Symposium Trondheim, Geol. Survey of Norway; 1987. P. 96-106.

19. Shilova KO. Problems of assessing the radon hazard of building territories by the example of measurements taken in the Russian Federation and the Czech Republic. Problems of geology and subsoil development: proceedings of the XX International Academician M.A. Usov students and young scientists dedicated to the 120th anniversary of the founding of Tomsk Polytechnic University, Tomsk, April 4-8, 2016. Tomsk: TPU Publishing House; 2016. V. 1. P. 609-610 (In Russian)

20. Marenny AM, Tsapalov AA, Miklyaev PS, Petrova TB. Formation patterns of the radon field in the geological environment. Federal Medical and Biological Agency, Scientific and Technical Center for Radiation Technical Safety and Hygiene of Russia; 2016. 394 p. (In Russian)

21. Ferry C, Beneito A, Richon P, Robé MC. An automatic device for measuring the effect of meteorological factors on radon-222 flux from soils in the long term. Radiation Protection Dosimetry. 2001;93(3): 271–274.

22. Jha S, Khan AH, Mishra UC. A study of the 222 Rn flux from soil in the U mineralised belt at Jaduguda. Journal of Environmental Radioactivity. 2000;49: 157-169.

23. Matiullah MF. Radon exhalation and its dependence on moisture content from samples of soil and building materials. Radiation Measurements. 2008;43: 1458–1462.

24. Kojima H, Nagano K. The influence of meteorological and soil parameters on radon exhalation. Radon in the Living Environment. 1999;071: 627-642.

25. Lawrence CE, Akber RA, Bollh−fer A, Martin P. Radon-222 exhalation from open ground on and around a uranium mine in the wet-dry tropics. Journal of Environmental Radioactivity. 2009;100: 1–8.

26. Hosoda M, Shimo M, Sugino M, Furukawa M, Fukushi M. Effect of Soil Moisture Content on Radon and Thoron Exhalation. Journal of Nuclear Science and Technology. 2007;44(4): 664-672.

27. Ryzhakova NK. A new method for estimating the coefficients of diffusion and emanation of radon in the soil. Journal of Environmental Radioactivity. 2014;135: 63-66.

28. Ryzhakova NK, Ramenskaya GA. Methods and results of determining the emanation coefficients for clay soils of Tomsk. Geoekologiya, inzhenernaya geologiya, gidrogeologiya, geokriologiya = Geoecology. Engineering Geology. Hydrogeology. Geocryology. 2012;2: 168-76 (In Russian)

29. Ryzhakova NK, Shestak AP. Methods and results of measurements of the radon effective diffusion coefficient in soils. Geoekologiya, inzhenernaya geologiya, gidrogeologiya, geokriologiya = Geoecology. Engineering Geology. Hydrogeology. Geocryology. 2009;6: 555-63 (In Russian)

30. Gulabyanc LA, Zabolotsky BYu. Power of the “active” soil layer during diffusion transfer of radon in the soil base of a building. ANRI. 2001;4: 38-40 (In Russian)