Quality assessment of indoor radon measurements. Results of the international radon in-field intercomparison study
https://doi.org/10.21514/1998-426X-2020-13-4-82-92
Abstract
The article presents the results of the international radon in-field intercomparison study for passive radon measurement devices. The tests were organized by the environmental agency of the administrative region of Piemonte (Ivrea, Italy). Coverage of participants was 49 laboratories from 15 countries (Italy, Hungary, France, Great Britain, Lithuania, Russia, Sweden, Spain, Bulgaria, Argentina, Australia, Finland, Ireland, Greece and Slovenia). The certified radon passive devices included SSNTDs and electret detectors. SSNTDs are mostly represented by PADC plastic (CR-39) and nitrocellulose film (LR-115-2) detectors. Radon measuring devices were tested in long-term exposure modes at low and high radon levels (tests 1 and 2) and short-term exposure mode at the simultaneous presence of radon and thoron in the atmosphere (test 3). The intercomparison study was carried out in real conditions of operated buildings with different climatic conditions. The main purpose of this study was to evaluate the quality (accuracy and reliability) of the radon measurements under situations similar to the ones in which devices are normally exposed. In comparison with electrets, solid-state track detectors showed to have generally better reproducibility. For the electrets, the most «comfortable» radon measurement conditions were prolonged exposure at high radon levels. There was no significant fading effect of SSNTD at long-term exposure observed. The paper presents the results of the quality assessment of REI-4 passive device based on LR-115-2 widely used for radon monitoring studies in the Russian Federation.
About the Authors
S. M. KiselevRussian Federation
Sergey M. Kiselev - Ph.D.in biol., Head of laboratory on regulatory supervisor of nuclear legacy sites.
MoscowA. M. Marennyy
Russian Federation
Albert M. Marennyy - Ph.D. in phys. and math., Chief of laboratory on natural radiation sources.
MoscowV. G. Starinskiy
Russian Federation
Vitaliy G. Starinskiy – researcher.
Zhivopisnaya ul., 46, Moscow, 123098Yu. S. Belskikh
Russian Federation
Yuriy S. Belskikh - researcher, State Research Center – Burnasyan.
MoscowV. V. Shlygin
Russian Federation
Vladimir V. Shlygin - junior researcher State Research Center – Burnasyan.
MoscowI. P. Korenkov
Russian Federation
Igor P. Korenkov - Doctor of biol., Ph.D. in technical sciences, major researcher State Research Center – Burnasyan.
MoscowN. A. Nefedov
Russian Federation
Nikolay A. Nefedov - Ph.D. in math, leading researcher.
MoscowM. A. Marennyy
Russian Federation
Mikhail A. Marennyy - Ph.D., chief engineer.
MoscowReferences
1. Protection of the public against exposure indoors due to radon and other natural sources of radiation. IAEA Safety Standards Series No. SSG-32. Vienna: International Atomic Energy Agency. 2015, 90 р. ISBN 978-92-0-102514-2.
2. Lecomte JF, Solomon S, Takala J, Jung T, Strand P, Murith C, et al. Radiological protection against radon exposure. Annals of the ICRP. 2014;43(3): 5-6.
3. Steck D. Annual average radon variation over two decades. Health Physics. 2009;96(1): 37-47.
4. Miles JCH, Howarth CB, Hunter N. Seasonal variation of radon concentrations in UK homes. Journal of Radiological Protection. 2012;32: 275-287.
5. Kotrappa P, Dempsey JC, Hickey JR, Stieff LR. An electrets passive environmental Rn-222 monitor based on ionization measurement. Health Physics. 1988;54(1): 47 - 56.
6. Kotrappa P, Dempsey JC, Ramsey RW, Stieff LR. A practical E-PEPM System for Indoor 222Rn Measurement. Health Physics. 1990;58(4): 461 - 467.
7. Nikolaev AV. Track method in radon measurements. ANRI= ANRI. 1998;2: 16-27. (In Russian)
8. Marennyy МА. Dielectric track detectors in a radiationphysical and radio-biological experiment. Moscow: Energoatomizdat. 1987. 184 р. (In Russian)
9. GW-893. Results of the 2017 PHE Intercomparison of Passive Radon Detectors. PHE publications. 2019.
10. Jilek K, Hyza M, KoUk L, Thomas J, Tomasek L. International intercomparison of measuring instruments for radon/thorongas and radon short-lived daughter products in the NRPI Prague. Radiation Protection Dosimetry. 2014;160(1-3): 154-159.
11. Cardellini F, Chiaberto E, Garlati L, Giuffrida D, Leonardi F, Magnoni M, et al. Metrological aspects of international intercomparison of passive radon detectors under field conditions in Marie Curie’s tunnel in Lurisia. Nukleonika. 2016;61(3): 251-256.
12. The second radon-in-field international intercomparison for passive measurement devices: dwellings and workplaces. Materials of WORKSHOP. 21-22.07.2017.
13. Berliera F, Cardellinib F, Chiaberto E, Garlati L, Giuffrida D, Ragani MF, et al. Main results of the second AIRP international radon-in-field intercomparison for passive measurement devices. Radiation measurements. 2019;128: 1-11.
14. Caresana M, Ferrarini M, Garlati L, Parravicini A. About ageing and fading of Cr-39 PADC track detectors used as air radon concentration measurement devices. Radiation Measurements. 2010;45: 183-189.
15. Caresana M, Ferrarini M, Garlati L, Parravicini A. Further studies on ageing and fading of CR39 PADC track detectors used as air radon concentration measurement devices. Radiation Measurements. 2011;46(10): 1160-1167.
16. Marennyy АМ. Radon concentration measurement by track method. ANRI= ANRI. 1995; 3/4:79-84. (In Russian)
17. Marennyy АМ. Methodological aspects of measuring the average concentration of radon in rooms by the track method. ANRI= ANRI. 2012;4: 13-19. (In Russian)
Review
For citations:
Kiselev S.M., Marennyy A.M., Starinskiy V.G., Belskikh Yu.S., Shlygin V.V., Korenkov I.P., Nefedov N.A., Marennyy M.A. Quality assessment of indoor radon measurements. Results of the international radon in-field intercomparison study. Radiatsionnaya Gygiena = Radiation Hygiene. 2020;13(4):82-92. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.21514/1998-426X-2020-13-4-82-92