Radiological consequences and lessons of the Chernobyl NPP and «Fukushima-1» NPP radiation accidents

35 years have passed since the Chernobyl NPP accident, 10 years – since the «Fukushima-1» NPP accident. At the present time extensive activities on the remediation of the consequences of two major large-scale radiation disasters are performed in the Belorussia, Russian Federation, Ukraine, and Japan. Releases of radiologically significant radionuclides after the Chernobyl NPP accident correspond to 14 exaBecquerel – higher up to an order of magnitude compared to 3 emergence power units of the «Fukushima-1» NPP. The significantly lower release rate and deposition of 80% of the radionuclides released into the atmosphere on the surface of the Pacific Ocean lead to lower up to several orders of magnitude radioactive contamination of the Japanese territory compared to the territories of the former USSR and neighboring countries after the Chernobyl NPP accident. Collective dose to the public due to the Chernobyl NPP accident is higher up to several orders of magnitude compared to the dose to the Japanese population after the «Fukushima-1» accident. No statistically reliable long-term medical consequences are expected for all groups of the Japanese public, additionally exposed due to «Fukushima-1» accident. 134 emergency workers have developed acute radiation sickness due to the Chernobyl NPP accident. Emergency workers with doses higher than 150 mSv had increased radiation-induced morbidity with leukemia and solid cancers. Among the individuals, that were kids or adolescents in the exposure period after the Chernobyl NPP accident and residing on the territories of Belorussia, Ukraine and four most radioactively contaminated regions of the Russian Federation, morbidity with thyroid cancer is increase by a factor of 10 compared to the pre-accidental levels. The following lessons of the Chernobyl NPP and «Fukushima-1» NPP can be derived: faults in the NPP design and lack of response after the recognition of the faults; lack of timely full-scale prophylactic with iodine; unjustified resettlement of the residents of the radioactively contaminated territories several years after the accident.

1. Radiation-hygienic aspects of the negotiation of the Chernobyl NPP consequences. Ed. By academic of RAS Onischenko GG and prof. Popova AYu. Saint-Petersburg, NIIRG after P.V. Ramzaev; 2016. Vol. 1. 448 p. (In Russian)

2. Onishchenko GG. The Chernobyl – Thirty Years after the Post – Accidental Radiological – Hygienic and Medical Consequences. Radiatsionnaya Gygiena = Radiation Hygiene. 2016;9(2):10-19. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.21514/1998-426X-2016-9-2-10-19 (In Russian)

3. Onischenko GG. Radiation-Hygienic and medical consequences of the Сhernobyl accident: results and prognosis. Radiatsionnaya Gygiena = Radiation Hygiene. 2011;4(2):23-30. (In Russian)

4. Balonov MI. International Assessments of Impacts of the Chernobyl Accident: the Chernobyl Forum (2003–2005) and UNSCEAR (2005–2008). Radiatsionnaya Gygiena = Radiation Hygiene. 2011;4(2):31-39. (In Russian)

5. Medical radiological consequences of Chernobyl: prognosis and real data 30 years later. Ed. Ivanov VK, Kaprin AD. Мoscow: GEOS; 2015. 450 p. (In Russian)

6. Ilyin LA. Realities and myths of the Chernobyl: 2nd edition, corrected and expanded. Мoscow: ALARA-Limited; 1996. 480 p. (In Russian)

7. Voronov SI, Lutoshkin AV, Popova AYu, Stepanov VS, Peshkov YuV, Kraevoy SA, et al. Russian national report 30 years of the Chernobyl accident. Results and perspectives of negotiation of the consequences in Russia 1986-2016. Ed. Puchkov VA, Bolshov LA. EMERCOM of Russia; 2016. 202 p. (In Russian)

8. Romanovich IK, Bruk GYa, Bazyukin AB, Bratilova AA, Yakovlev VA. The dynamics of the average annual and cumulative radiation exposure doses of the adult population of the Russian federation after the Chernobyl disaster. Zdorovye naseleniya i sreda obitaniya = Health of the public and the environment. 2020;3(324): 33-38. ISSN: 2219-5238e ISSN: 2619-0788. (In Russian)

9. Romanovich IK, Bruk GYa, Barkovsky AN, Bratilova AA, Gromov AV, Kaduka MV. Substantiation of the concept of transfer to conditions of normal population activity of the settlements considered to be zones of radioactive contamination after the Chernobyl NPP accident. Radiatsionnaya Gygiena = Radiation Hygiene. 2016;9(1):6-18. (In Russian)

10. Romanovich IK, Balonov MI, Barkovsky AN, Nikitin AI. NPP “Fukushima-1” accident: management of the prophylactic actions aimed at the preservation of health of the public of the Russian Federation. Ed. by academic of RAS Onischenko GG. Saint-Petersburg: NIIRG after P.V. Ramzaev; 2012. 336 p. (In Russian)

11. Arutyunyan RV, Bolshov LA, Borovoy AA, Velikhov EP. System analysis of the causes and consequences of the “Fukushima-1” NPP accident. Institute of the problems of the safe development of the nuclear energy RAS. Мoscow; 2018. 408 p. (In Russian)

12. The Fukushima Daiichi accident: Report by the Director general. Vienna: Intern. Atomic Energy Agency, 2015. 209 p. (IAEA. GC(59)/14). – Available from: http://www-pub.iaea.org (Accessed: 24.02.2021)

13. Onischenko GG, Popova АYu, Romanovich IK, Ivanov SA, Biblin AM, Repin VS, et al. Results of the fourth combined scientific expedition for the radiation monitoring in the KurilyKamchatka region of the Pacific ocean. Radiatsionnaya Gygiena = Radiation Hygiene. 2020;13(1): 6–15. (In Russian)

14. Chernobyl NPP accident and consequences: Information prepared for the IAEA expert meeting: 25-29.08 1986.: Vienna, parts 1 and 2. Мoscow: GK IAE USSR; 1986. 73 p. (In Russian)

15. Asmolov VG, Borovoy AA, Demin VF, Kalugin AK, Kuzmin II, Kulakov VM, et al. Chernobyl NPP accident – a year after. Atomnaya energiya = Atomic Energy. 1988;64(1): 3 – 23. (In Russian)

16. Analysis of the factors of the Chernobyl NPP accident by the mathematic modelling of the physical processes: report of the VNIIAES. Inv. Number 864; 1987. 52 p. (In Russian)

17. Yadrikhinskiy АА. Nuclear accident on the 4th unit of the Chernobyl NPP and nuclear safety of the RBMK reactors: Gospromatomnadzor inspection on Kursk NPP. Kurchatov; 1989. 47 p. (In Russian)

18. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION, A Comparison of US and Japanese Regulatory Requirements in Effect at the Time of the Fukushima Accident, NRC, Washington, DC; 2013.

19. ICAFNPS. Final report and attachments. Investigation Committee on the Accident at the Fukushima Nuclear Power Stations of Tokyo Electric Power Company on 28 November 2012. – Available from: http://www.cas.go.jp/jp/seisaku/icanps/eng/final-report.html (Accessed: 24.02.2021)

20. Proshin AD, Stepanenko PA, Shaposhnikova EN. Radiationecological situation on the territory of Bryansk region in 2986- 2000. Consequences of the Chernobyl accident. Health of the Bryansk region public: proceedings. Bryansk: Chitay-gorod; 2001. P. 10 – 18. (In Russian)

21. Chernobyl legacy: medical, ecological, and social-economic consequences and recommendation to the governments of Belorussia, Russian Federation and Ukraine. Chernobyl forum: 2003-2005. 2nd ed. Vena: IAEA; 2006. 58 p. (In Russian)

22. ICRP Publication 103. The 2007 Recommendations of the International Commission on Radiological Protection: translation from English. Edited by Kiselev MF, Shandala NK. Мoscow: «Alana»; 2009. 312 p. (In Russian)

23. IAEA Safety Standards for protecting people and environment. Radiation Protection and Safety of Radiation Sources: International Basic Safety Standards. General Safety Requirements. Part 3 No GSR Part 3. Vienna; 2014. 436 p. (In Russian)

24. Temporal guidelines on the development of the measures on the protection of the public for the nuclear reactor accidents. Approved by the deputy chief sanitary doctor of USSR Loranskiy DN. 18.12.1970; №872/1. Мoscow; 1971. 46 p. (In Russian)

25. Dibobes IK, Ilyin LA, Konstantinov YuO, et al. Emergency decision-making on the protection of the public in case of emergency radioactive discharge into the environment. Handling of radiation accidents. Proc. Symp., Vienna, 19-23 May 1969. IAEA, Vienna; 1969. P. 547-558. (In Russian)

26. Konstantinov YuO. Criteria for the emergency decision-making on the protection of the public for the NPP accidents // Radiation protection and safety of NPP.: M. Energoatomizdat; 1985. No. 9. P. 148-152. (In Russian)

27. SanPiN 2.3.2.1078-01. Hygienic requirements on the safety and food value of the food products. Sanitary rules and norms. M.: FGUP “InterSEN”; 2002. P. 50-58. (In Russian)

28. Joint sanitary-epidemiological and hygienic requirements on the goods for the sanitary-epidemiological control (with changes on 15.01.2013). Decision of the Customs Union commission. 28.05.2010. No. 299. (In Russian)

29. MINISTRY OF HEALTH, LABOUR AND WELFARE. New Standard Limits for Radionuclides in Foods. 2012. – Available from: http://www.mhlw.go.jp/english/topics/2011eq/dl/new_standard.pdf (Accessed: 24.02.2021)

30. Sources, effects and risks of ionizing radiation. UNSCEAR 2013 report. Report to the General Assembly with Scientific Annexes. Volume 1. Scientific Annex A. Levels and effects of radiation exposure due to the nuclear accident after the 2011 great east-Japan earthquake and tsunami. United Nations; 2014. 321 p.

31. TEPCO. Press release (Nov 30, 2011): Evaluation status of internal exposure dose of emergency workers. Tokyo Electric Power Company. on 11 April 2013. – Available from: (http://www.tepco.co.jp/en/press/corp-com/release/11113013-e.html) (Accessed: 24.02.2021)

32. Balonov M. Health Effects of Reactor Accidents with Special Regards to Chernobyl – A Review Paper. Journal of the Physical Society of Japan. 2019;54 (3): 161 – 171.

33. Abagyan AA, Asmolov VG, Guskova AK, et al. Data on the Chernobyl NPP accident and its consequences for the IAEA. Atomnaya energiya = Atomic Energy. 1986;61(5): 301-320. (In Russian)

34. Guskova AK. Medical consequences of the Chernobyl NPP accident. Main results and unsolved problems. Meditsinskaya radiologiya i radiatsionnaya bezopasnost = Medical radiology and radiation safety. 2010;55(3): 17-28. (In Russian)

35. Ivanov VK, Khait SE, Kashcheev VV, et al. Leukosis morbidity of the liquidators of the consequences of the Chernobyl NPP accident for the 1986-2007 surveillance period. Radiatsiya i risk = Radiation and risk. 2010;19(2): 7-20. (In Russian)

36. Ivanov VK, Karpenko SV, Kashcheev VV, Chekin SYu, Maksyutov MA, Tumanov KA, et al. Radiation risks of the Russian liquidators of the consequences of the Chernobyl NPP accident for the 1992-2017 period. Part 1: solid cancer morbidity. Radiatsiya i risk = Radiation and risk. 2019;28(4): 16-30. (In Russian)

37. Ivanov VK, Karpenko SV, Kashcheev VV. Radiation risks of the Russian liquidators of the consequences of the Chernobyl NPP accident for the 1992-2017 period. Part 1: solid cancer mortality. Radiatsiya i risk = Radiation and risk. 2020;29(1): 18-31. (In Russian)

38. Rozhko AV, Cheshik AA, Veyalkin IV, Nikonovich SN. Morbidity by the malignant neoplasms of the blood and lymphatic system of the liquidators of the Chernobyl NPP accident in the Republic of Belarus. Bulletin if the national academy of sciences of Belarus. Medical sciences series. 2017;3: 82–90. (In Russian)

39. UNSCEAR. Evaluation of data on Thyroid Cancer in Regions affected by the Chernobyl accident. A white paper to guide the Scientific Committee’s future programme of work. United Nations. New York; 2018. 30 p.

40. Ivanov VK, Tsyb AF, Maksyutov MA, Tumanov KA, Chekin SYu, Kashcheev VV, et al. Problem of the thyroid cancer in Russian after the Chernobyl NPP accident: assessment of the radiation risks in 1991-2008 surveillance period. Radiatsiya i risk = Radiation and risk. 2010;19(3): 33-58. (In Russian)

41. Consequences of the exposure for the human health due to the Chernobyl accident. UNSCEAR. Scientific annex D for the USCEAR 2008 report. UN. New-York; 2012. 182 p. (In Russian)

42. Health risk assessment from the nuclear accident after the 2011 Great East Japan Earthquake and Tsunami based on a preliminary dose estimation. World Health Organization; 2013. 172 p.