Consideration of the contribution of the natural background component during individual control of radiation doses to personnel

When ensuring radiation safety in the Russian Federation, there is a principle of separate independent assessment of doses from natural, medical, emergency and technogenic exposure. In practice, it is not always possible to comply with this principled approach. The established dose limits are related only to man-made radiation during normal operation of sources of ionizing radiation. However, during the formation of regional and federal databases on individual doses of personnel exposure, information is entered not on technogenic exposure, but on industrial exposure, that is, without subtracting the natural radiation background. The natural component of the individual dose at low radiation doses is quite significant. Failure to its subtraction leads to an overestimation of the individual dose of external exposure of personnel. Difficulties arise in the implementation of the subtraction of the natural radiation background: 1) in what cases it is necessary to subtract the background, 2) what value to choose for the subtracted background, 3) what method to measure the background, 4) at what stage of processing the measurement information to subtract the background. This article proposes a method for solving the problem of subtracting the natural background radiation from the values of individual doses of external exposure to personnel based on results of individual dosimetric control. Using the example of the city of St. Petersburg, the natural background radiation was measured by the thermoluminescent method of individual dosimetry at 50 control points for three consecutive years (2018-2020). To measure the natural background, we used individual thermoluminescent dosimeters of the same type as those used to measure individual equivalents of external radiation doses to personnel. The choice of using the thermoluminescent method as a predominant one for adjusting the average doses of external radiation from technogenic sources of ionizing radiation when subtracting the natural component of the dose has been substantiated. Comparison of official data on personnel exposure doses with the data obtained as a result of our own measurements is made. Recommendations are given on the use of the obtained values of the average natural radiation background in the formation of regional and federal databases on individual doses of personnel exposure.

1. Bazhin SYu, Shleenkova EN, Kaidanovsky GN, Ilyin VA. Possibilities of comparing the average annual effective doses of medical personnel in Russia and some foreign countries. Radiatsionnaya Gygiena = Radiation Hygiene. 2020;13(2): 89-98. (In Russian).

2. Grigorev AI, Pankratov LV. Problems of subtraction of the background in the process of the individual radiation control and radiating control on open air. Radiatsionnaya Gygiena = Radiation Hygiene. 2011;4(4): 42-48. (In Russian).

3. Barkovsky AN, Baryshkov NK, Bratilova AA, et al. Doses to the public of the Russian Federation in 2015: information bulletin. Saint-Petersburg; 2016. 72 p. (In Russian).

4. Barkovsky AN, Baryshkov NK, Bratilova AA, et al. Doses to the public of the Russian Federation in 2016: information bulletin. Saint-Petersburg; 2017. 72 p. (In Russian).

5. Akhmatdinov RR, Baryshkov NK, Biblin AM, Bratilova AA, et al. Doses to the public of the Russian Federation in 2017: information bulletin. Saint-Petersburg; 2018. 72 p. (In Russian).

6. Barkovsky AN, Ruslan R. Akhmatdinov, Rustam R. Akhmatdinov, Baryshkov NK, Biblin AM, Bratilova AA, et al. Doses to the public of the Russian Federation in 2018: information bulletin. Saint-Petersburg; 2019. 72 p. (In Russian).

7. Barkovsky AN, Ruslan R. Akhmatdinov, Rustam R. Akhmatdinov, Baryshkov NK, Biblin AM, Bratilova AA, et al. Doses to the public of the Russian Federation in 2019: information bulletin. Saint-Petersburg; 2020. 70 p. (In Russian).

8. Sources and Effects of Ionizing Radiation: United Nations Scientific Committee on the Effects of Atomic Radiation; 2000. Report. Volume I, Annex E.

9. Romanovich IK, Stamat IP, Kormanovskaya TA, Kononenko DV, et al. Natural sources of ionizing exposure: doses, radiation risks, prophylactic measures. Edited by academician of RAS G.G. Onischenko and prof. A.Yu. Popova. Saint-Petersburg; 2018. 431 p. (In Russian).

10. Yudin MF, et al. Measurements of activity of radionuclides. Reference manual. Saint-Petersburg; 1997. 397 p. (In Russian).

11. Obesnyuk V. To the question of the radiation background subtraction. XIX All-Russian Scientific and Practical Conference. Dedicated to the 150th anniversary of the discovery of the periodic law by D.I. Mendeleev.: Materials of the conference. Ozersk, April 17-20, 2019. P. 72-74 (In Russian).

12. Obesnyuk V. Dosimetric Paradox of Background Subtracting and Method of its Resolution. ANRI = ANRI. 2020;1: 25-26. (In Russian).