Preview

Radiatsionnaya Gygiena = Radiation Hygiene

Advanced search

Influence of the irradiation geometry on the severity of acute radiation damage

https://doi.org/10.21514/1998-426X-2022-15-2-31-41

Abstract

The aim of this study was to demonstrate how the severity of radiation damage in the case of bone marrow syndrome due to acute irradiation depends on the non-uniform irradiation of the body. We used the calculation method that involves the evaluation of organism mortality as a function of bone marrow cells colony survival vs dose for different radiation profiles. It was presumed that the probability of the death for the organism is the same for the same value of survival level of the bone marrow cells regardless of the dose distribution by mass of the organ. The dose of uniform irradiation that is equivalent to the dose for the L-th case of non-uniform irradiation is calculate based on the survival level of the total marrow cells. After that the probability of the death of the organism is estimated according to the dose response curve. Dose distribution in bone marrow of computational MIRD-5-type stylized model adult man for different geometries of exposure by point source of 137Cs was evaluated. Larger non-uniformity of the dose distribution in the bone marrow at the same dose in free air in the site of human location causes a greater probability of survival due to a greater proportion of bone marrow cells that have preserved the possibility of reproduction. The values of mean 50% lethal dose for cases of approximately uniform irradiation of the body surface (point source at a distance 10m) and sharply non-uniform irradiation (point source at a distance of 0.5 m) differ approximately by the factor of 1.7 – 2.5 depending on direction of irradiation. Additionally the values of conversion coefficients from the reading of an individual dosimeter to the value of an effective dose for various geometries of irradiation of emergency workers from the 137Cs point source were calculated. The average value of the conversion coefficient from personal dose to effective dose for the considered exposure situations is 0.7 Sv Cy-1 and the 90% confidence interval is 0.49 – 0.99 Sv Gy-1.

About the Authors

V. Yu. Golikov
Saint-Petersburg Research Institute of Radiation Hygiene after Professor P.V. Ramzaev, Federal Service for Surveillance on Consumer Rights Protection and Human Wellbeing
Russian Federation

 Senior Researcher of the Medical Protection Laboratory 

 Mira Str., 8, Saint-Petersburg, 197101, Russia 



A. V. Vodovatov
Saint-Petersburg Research Institute of Radiation Hygiene after Professor P.V. Ramzaev, Federal Service for Surveillance on Consumer Rights Protection and Human Wellbeing; Saint-Petersburg State Pediatric Medical University
Russian Federation

 PhD, Researcher, Head of the Medical Protection Laboratory; Associate Professor of the Department of Hygiene 

Saint-Petersburg 



References

1. United Nations Scientific Committee on the Effects of Atomic Radiation. Sources and Effects of Ionizing Radiation. UNSCEAR 2008 Report to the General Assembly with Scientific Annexes. Volume II, Scientific Annexes C, D and E. New York, UN; 2011.

2. U.S. Department of Homeland Security. Technology Assessment and Roadmap for the Emergency Radiation Dose Assessment Program. UCRL-TR-215887. June, 2005.

3. National Council on Radiation Protection and Measurements. Management of terrorist events involving radioactive material. NCRP Report No. 138. Bethesda, Md: National Council on Radiation Protection and Measurements; 2001.

4. Avetisov GM, Darenskaya NG, Nelyubov AA. Biological effects of non-uniform radiation impacts. Moscow: Atomizdat; 1974.

5. Gozenbuk VL, Keirim-Markus IB. Dosimetric criteria for the severity of acute human irradiation. Moscow: Energoatomizdat; 1988.

6. Wolbarst AB, Wiley AL, Nemhauser JB, Christensen DM, Hendee WR. Medical response to a major radiologic emergency: a primer for medical and public health practitioners. Radiology. 2010;254: 660–677.

7. IAEA. Generic Procedures for Medical Response During a Nuclear or Radiological Emergency, Vienna, Austria: International Atomic Energy Agency; 2005.

8. Jones TD. Hematologic Syndrome in Man Modeled from Mammalian Lethality. Health Physics. 1981;41: 83-103.

9. Golikov V. Method and software for photon dose calculation in phantoms of human body. Radiatsionnaya Gygiena = Radiation Hygiene. 2019;12(2): 55-65. (In Russian).

10. Golikov V, Barkovsky A, Wallstrōm E, Cederblad Å. A comparative study of organ doses assessment for patients undergoing conventional X-ray examinations: phantom experiments vs. calculations. Radiation Protection Dosimetry. 2018;178(2): 223-234.

11. Snyder WS, Ford MR, Warner GG, Watson GG. Revision of MIRD Pamphlet No 5 Entitled ‘Estimates of absorbed fractions for monoenergetic photon sources uniformly distributed in various organs of a heterogeneous phantom’ ORNL-4979. Tennessee: Oak Ridge National Laboratory; 1974.

12. Han EY, Bolch WE, Eckerman KF. Revisions to the ORNL series of adult and pediatric computational phantoms for use with the MIRD schema. Health Physics. 2006;90(4): 337–356.

13. Golikov V. Assessment of the absorbed doses in the organs in case of radiation emergency with the sealed gamma-sources. Radiation Protection Dosimetry. 2019;185(1): 67-73.


Review

For citations:


Golikov V.Yu., Vodovatov A.V. Influence of the irradiation geometry on the severity of acute radiation damage. Radiatsionnaya Gygiena = Radiation Hygiene. 2022;15(2):31-41. https://doi.org/10.21514/1998-426X-2022-15-2-31-41

Views: 479


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 1998-426X (Print)
ISSN 2409-9082 (Online)