Justification of differential approach to management of patient biological waste in nuclear medicine departments
https://doi.org/10.21514/1998-426X-2022-15-4-34-44
Abstract
The development of nuclear medicine technologies in the Russian Federation contributes to the implementation of new diagnostic radiopharmaceuticals in practice. Theranostic pairs such as antibodies and peptides labeled diagnostic and therapeutic radionuclides are beginning to be commonly used. The use of radionuclides with a longer half-life in radionuclide diagnostics causes the updating of the approaches to management of liquid waste generated as a result of the patient’s metabolic activity during the time spent in the radionuclide diagnostics department. Management of liquid radioactive waste in radionuclide diagnostic department is regulated by guidelines MU 2.6.1.1892-04. The guidelines are not the regulatory document. These were developed about 20 years ago, and do not considering features of the modern methods in radionuclide diagnostics, promising radionuclides with half-life of several days, and new criteria for classifying as a radionuclide waste in accordance with Resolution of the Government of the Russian Federation No. 1069. The aim of the study was the assessment of the radionuclide activities excreted from patient after radiopharmaceutical injection in radionuclide diagnostics departments in order to define the waste management pathways. In a result, all diagnostic and therapeutic radiopharmaceuticals were divided into the categories: radiopharmaceuticals with ultrashort-lived radionuclides, which can be discharged into the hospital sewerage without any restrictions; radiopharmaceuticals with 131I, which need the special sewerage; the other radiopharmaceuticals, which need to assess the volume of discharged radionuclide activities during the projection of the nuclear medicine department. The method of assessment of the radionuclide activities entering the hospital sewerage is presented.
Keywords
About the Authors
L. A. ChipigaRussian Federation
Larisa A. Chipiga – Ph.D., research fellow, Saint-Petersburg Research Institute of Radiation Hygiene after Professor P.V. Ramzaev, Federal Service for Surveillance on Consumer Rights Protection and Human Well-Being; research fellow, A.M. Granov Russian Scientific Center of Radiology and Surgical Technologies of the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation; docent, Almazov National Medical Research Centre of the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation
Mira str., 8, Saint-Petersburg, 197101, Russia
A. V. Vodovatov
Russian Federation
Aleksandr V. Vodovatov – Ph.D., Head of Laboratory, Saint-Petersburg Research Institute of Radiation Hygiene after Professor P.V. Ramzaev, Federal Service for Surveillance on Consumer Rights Protection and Human Well-Being; docent, SaintPetersburg State Pediatric Medical University
Saint-Petersburg
A. V. Petryakova
Russian Federation
Anastasia V. Petryakova – acting junior researcher, Saint-Petersburg Research Institute of Radiation Hygiene after Professor P.V. Ramzaev, Federal Service for Surveillance on Consumer Rights Protection and Human Well-Being; radiation safety engineer, Saint-Petersburg City Hospital No. 40
Saint-Petersburg
I. A. Zvonova
Russian Federation
Irina A. Zvonova – Doctor of Technical Sciences, Chief Researcher of Protection Laboratory, Saint-Petersburg Research Institute of Radiation Hygiene after Professor P.V. Ramzaev, Federal Service for Surveillance on Consumer Rights Protection and Human Well-Being
Saint-Petersburg
A. A. Stanzhevsky
Russian Federation
Andrey A. Stanzhevsky – M.D., Deputy Director for Research, A.M. Granov Russian Scientific Center of Radiology and Surgical Technologies of the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation
Saint-Petersburg
D. N. Maistrenko
Russian Federation
Dmitriy N. Maistrenko – M.D., Head of A.M. Granov Russian Scientific Center of Radiology and Surgical Technologies of the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation
Saint-Petersburg
D. A. Vazhenina
Russian Federation
Daria A. Vazhenina – M.D., Chief Researcher, Head of Laboratory of Theragnostic and Oncology, A.M. Granov Russian Scientific Center of Radiology and Surgical Technologies of the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation
Saint-Petersburg
D. S. Sysoev
Russian Federation
Dmitriy S. Sysoev – Ph.D., Head of the group for the development and production of equipment for nuclear medicine, A.M. Granov Russian Scientific Center of Radiology and Surgical Technologies of the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation
Saint-Petersburg
References
1. Results of radiation-hygienic passportization in regions of the Russian Federation in 2015-2021. (RadiationHygienic Passport of the Russian Federation). Moscow: Rospotrebnadzor; 2016-2022. (In Russian).
2. Onishchenko GG, Popova AYu, Romanovich IК, Barkovsky AN, Kormanovskaya TA, Shevkun IG. Radiation-hygienic passportization and USIDC-information basis for management decision making for radiation safety of the population of the Russian Federation. Report 1. Main achievements and challenges to improve. Radiatsionnaya Gygiena = Radiation Hygiene. 2017;10(3): 7-17. https://doi. org/10.21514/1998-426X-2017-10-3-7-17.
3. Dewulf J, Adhikari K, Vangestel C, Wyngaert TVD, Elvas F. Development of Antibody Immuno-PET/SPECT Radiopharmaceuticals for Imaging of Oncological Disorders – An Update. Cancers. 2020;12(7): 868. https://doi. org/10.3390/cancers12071868.
4. Chipiga LA, Petrova AE, Mosunov AA, et al. Preliminary evaluation of patient radiation doses during radionuclide diagnostic with monoclonal antibodies labeled with 89Zr. Pharmacy Formulas. 2021;3(3): 48-61. doi: 10.17816/phf81118.
5. Zhukovsky MV, Onishchenko AD. Radiopharmaceuticals Based on Monoclonal Antibodies for PET and SPECT Imaging: Biokinetic Models and Dosimetric Evaluations. Traektoriya issledovaniy – chelovek, priroda, tekhnologii = Research trajectory – man, nature, technology. 2022;2(2): 80-155. DOI: 10.56564/27825264_2022_2_80.
6. Gear J, Chiesa C, Lassmann M, et al. EANM Dosimetry Committee series on standard operational procedures for internal dosimetry for 131I-mIBG treatment of neuroendocrine tumours. EJNMMI Physics. 2020;7(1): 15. https://doi. org/10.1186/s40658-020-0282-7.
7. Narkevich BYa. Analysis of Radiation Safety Problems in Nuclear Medicine. Onkologicheskij zhurnal: luchevaja diagnostika, luchevaja terapiya = Journal of oncology: diagnostic radiology and radiotherapy. 2018;1(1): 89-85. (In Russian).
8. Narkevich BYa. Radiation Safety in Nuclear Medicine: Report I. Topical Problems. Meditsinskaya radiologiya i radiatsionnaya bezopasnost = Medical Radiology and Radiation Safety. 2021;66(1): 29-36. (In Russian) https://doi. org/10.12737/1024-6177-2021-66-1-29-36.
9. Romanovich IK, Barkovsky AN. On A New Criteria of the Referring Waste to Radioactive Categories and on the Amendments Introduced in BSRRSP-99/2010 and SRRWT-2002. Radiatsionnaya Gygiena = Radiation Hygiene. 2014;7(1): 30-35. (In Russian).
10. Chipiga LA, Vodovatov AV, Zvonova IA, Stanzhevsky AA, Petryakova AV, Anokina EE, et al. Management of biological waste of patients after radionuclide therapy. Radiatsionnaya Gygiena = Radiation Hygiene. 2022;15(12): 19-30. (In Russian) https://doi.org/10.21514/1998-426X-2022-15-2-19-30.
11. Song H, Mosci C, Akatsu H, et al. Diagnostic 123I Whole Body Scan Prior to Ablation of Thyroid Remnant in Patients with Papillary Thyroid Cancer. Clinical Nuclear Medicine. 2018;43(10): 705-709. https://doi.org/10.1097/ RLU.0000000000002246.
12. Ott RJ, Tait D, Flower MA, et al. Treatment planning for 131I-mIBG radiotherapy of neural crest tumours using 124I-mIBG positron emission tomography. The British journal of radiology. 1992;65(777): 787-791. https://doi. org/10.1259/0007-1285-65-777-787.
13. Dijkers EC, Oude Munnink TH, Kosterink JG, et al. Biodistribution of 89Zr-trastuzumab and PET imaging of HER2-positive lesions in patients with metastatic breast cancer. Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics. 2010;87(5): 586-92. https://doi.org/10.1038/clpt.2010.12.
14. Anderson CJ, Ferdani R. Copper-64 radiopharmaceuticals for PET imaging of cancer: advances in preclinical and clinical research. Cancer Biotherapy and Radiopharmaceuticals. 2009;24(4): 379-93. https://doi. org 10.1089/cbr.2009.0674.
15. Parlak Y, Gumuser G, Sayit E. Samarium-153 therapy for prostate cancer: the evaluation of urine activity, staff exposure and dose rate from patients. Radiation Protection Dosimetry. 2015;163(4): 468-472. doi: 10.1093/rpd/ncu237.
16. ICRP. Radiation Dose to Patients from Radiopharmaceuticals: A Compendium of Current Information Related to Frequently Used Substances. ICRP Publication 128. Ann. ICRP. 2015, 44(2S).
17. ICRP. Radiation Dose to Patients from Radiopharmaceuticals. ICRP Publication 53. Ann. ICRP. 1988; 18 (1-4).
18. Dowd MT, Chen CT, Wendel MJ, et al. Radiation dose to the bladder wall from 2-[18F] fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose in adult humans. Journal of Nuclear Medicine. 1991;32(4): 707-712.
19. Chen CT, Harper PV, Lathrop KA. A simple dynamic model for calculating radiation absorbed dose to the bladder wall. 4th International Radiopharmaceutical Dosimetry Symposium. 1985: 5-8. 20. Kurth J, Krause BJ, Schwarzenböck SM, Stegger L, Schäfers M, Rahbar K. External radiation exposure, excretion, and effective half-life in 177Lu-PSMA-targeted therapies. European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging research. 2018;8(1): 1-11. https://doi.org/10.1186/ s13550-018-0386-4.
20. Shielded WC for disposal of organic radioactive waste. URL: https://www.comecer.com/wdl-series-shieldedwc-disposal-organic-radioactive-waste/ (Accessed: 20.10.2022)
Review
For citations:
Chipiga L.A., Vodovatov A.V., Petryakova A.V., Zvonova I.A., Stanzhevsky A.A., Maistrenko D.N., Vazhenina D.A., Sysoev D.S. Justification of differential approach to management of patient biological waste in nuclear medicine departments. Radiatsionnaya Gygiena = Radiation Hygiene. 2022;15(4):34-44. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.21514/1998-426X-2022-15-4-34-44