Development of public exposure scenarios for land sites with residual radioactive contamination

The article considers the experience of development of public exposure scenarios for land sites with residual radioactive contamination on the example of three sites located in Moscow and St. Petersburg. The study was intended to identify the anticipated groups of land users and select parameters for calculating radiation doses. Exposure scenarios regarding use of land sites for living or working were described by such parameters as duration of the stay, staying indoors or outdoors, physical activity, etc. Exposure pathways for selected users were identified using the conceptual site model approach. For calculations within a number of scenarios, geomigration modeling of radionuclide transport in the environment was performed using the GeRa code. Exposure doses for population groups were calculated using the Ecorad-Aqua software module. Doses were calculated for each exposure pathway. The study demonstrates that the proposed scenario “Office worker” can be applied to various sites that are planned for placing administrative, industrial, scientific, commercial buildings and structures, scenario “Construction worker” – for sites with construction and excavation activities underway. The parameters of the “Resident” scenario allow for its application for the multiapartment residential development in large cities. In the future, it is practical to develop a typical scenario for an outdoor worker whose activity is to provide care and maintenance of the site. These scenarios can be used as ready-made solutions for calculating radiation doses for the population from residual radioactivity at the nuclear sites under decommissioning and remediated areas. Estimates of annual effective doses for the population are needed for decommissioning and remediation planning and determination of the values of radiation factors in the relevant projects.

1. Reuse Assessments: A Tool To Implement The Superfund Land Use Directive. OSWER 9355.7-06P. Washington D.C.: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency; 2001. 24 p. Available from: https://clu-in.org/download/toolkit/thirdednew/reuseassesstool.pdf (Accessed 24 Jan 2023).

2. Considering Reasonably Anticipated Future Land Use and Reducing Barriers to Reuse at EPA-lead Superfund Remedial Sites. OSWER 9355.7-19. Washington D.C.: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency; 2010. 14 p. Available from: https://semspub.epa.gov/work/HQ/175563.pdf (Accessed 24 Jan 2023).

3. Use of Risk-Based End States. Policy DOE P 455.1 Washington D.C.: U.S. Department of Energy; 2003. 4 p. Available from: https://www.directives.doe.gov/directives-documents/400-series/0455.1-APolicy/@@images/file (Accessed 24 Jan 2023).

4. Management of soils contaminated by the activities of Basic Nuclear Installations. ASN Guide No. 24, Version of 08/30/2016. 30 p. Available from: https://www.french-nuclear-safety.fr/asn-regulates/asn-guides/asn-guide-no.-24 (Accessed 23 Jan 2023).

5. Abalkina IL, Panchenko SV. Conceptual Site Model as an Example of Best Practices in Remediation. Preprint № IBRAE-2020-02. Moscow: Nuclear Safety Institute (IBRAE) RAS; 2020. 49 p. (In Russian).

6. Abalkina IL, Panchenko SV. Conceptual Site Model as an Instrument for Remediation Planning. Voprosy radiatsionnoi bezopasnosti = Journal of Radiation Safety Issues. 2020;2(98): 3-11. (In Russian).

7. Best Foreign Practices in Decommissioning of Nuclear Installations and Remediation of Contaminated Areas. Volume 1. Ed. by I.I. Linge and A.A. Abramov. Moscow: Nuclear Safety Institute (IBRAE) RAS; 2017. 366 p. (In Russian).

8. Standard Guide for Developing Conceptual Site Models for Contaminated Sites. ASTM International E1689-95(2008). 9 p.

9. Environmental Cleanup Best Management Practices: Effective Use of the Project Life Cycle Conceptual Site Model. EPA 542F-11-011. Washington D.C.: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency; 2011. 12 p. Available from: https://www.epa.gov/sites/default/files/2015-04/documents/csm-life-cycle-factsheet-final.pdf (Accessed 23 Jan 2023).

10. Technical Guidance for Preparation and Submission of a Conceptual Site Model. Version 1.1. New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection; 2019. 46 p. Available from: https://www.nj.gov/dep/srp/guidance/srra/csm_tech_guidance.pdf (Accessed 23 Jan 2023).

11. ISO/DIS 21365. Soil quality - Conceptual site models for potentially contaminated sites. Available from: https://www.iso.org/obp/ui/#iso:std:iso:21365:dis:ed-1:v1:en. (Accessed 23 Jan 2023).

12. Remediation Strategy and Process for Areas Affected by Past Activities or Events. IAEA Safety Standards Series No. GSG-15. Vienna: International Atomic Energy Agency; 2022. 201 p.

13. Shubayr N. Overview of Radiation Risk and Dose Assessment Models for Radioactively Contaminated Sites and Selected Default Input Parameters. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, ORISE; 2017. 73 p. Available from: https://epaprgs.ornl.gov/radionuclides/Overview_of_Rad_R.A.Ms.pdf (Accessed 23 Jan 2023).

14. Abalkina IL, Panchenko SV, Savkin MN, Vedernikova MV, Kryshev II. Socially and Ecologically Acceptable Criteria for Remediation of Contaminated Areas of Non-Retrievable Waste Facilities. Voprosy radiatsionnoi bezopasnosti = Journal of Radiation Safety Issues. 2017;87(3): 46-52. (In Russian).

15. Romanovich IK, Stamat IP, Sanzharova NI, Panov AV. Criteria for rehabilitation of facilities and territories contaminated with radionuclides as a result of past activities: Part 1. The choice of indicators for justification of the criteria or rehabilitation. Radiatsionnaya Gygiena = Radiation Hygiene. 2016;9(4): 6-15. https://doi.org/10.21514/1998-426X-2016-9-4-6-15. (In Russian).

16. Golikov VYu, Romanovich IK. Justification for the radiological criteria for the use of areas with residual radioactive contamination based on the dose approach. Radiatsionnaya Gygiena = Radiation Hygiene. 2017;10(4): 6-22. https://doi.org/10.21514/1998426X-2017-10-4-6-22. (In Russian).

17. Kapyrin IV. Computational Codes for the Hydrogeological Modeling in the Safety Assessment of Nuclear Facilities. Radioaktivnye Otkhody = Radioactive Waste. 2022;2: 105-118. https://doi.org/10.25283/2587-9707-2022-2-105-118. (In Russian).

18. Arakelyan AA, Blohin AI, Blohin PA, Vaneev YuE, Kazieva ST, Kizub RA, et al. Refinement of KORIDA Software Complex and its Application in Addressing SNF and RW Management Problems. Radioaktivnye Otkhody = Radioactive Waste. 2022;3: 107-116. https://doi.org/10.25283/2587-9707-2022-3-107-116. (In Russian).

19. Handbook of Parameter Values for the Prediction of Radionuclide Transfer in Terrestrial and Freshwater Environments. Technical Reports Series No. 472. Vienna: International Atomic Energy Agency; 2010. 194 p.

20. Radiation protection and safety of radiation sources: International basic safety standards. IAEA safety standards series no. GSR Part 3. Vienna: International Atomic Energy Agency; 2014. 436 p.

21. Exposure Factors Handbook 2011 Edition (Final Report). EPA/600/R-09/052F. Washington D.C.: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency; 2011. 62 p. Available from: https://www. epa.gov/sites/default/files/2015-09/documents/efh-frontmatter.pdf (Accessed 24 Jan 2023).

22. Yearbook “The state of atmospheric pollution in Russian cities in 2021”. St. Petersburg: FGBI “MGO”; 2022. 254 p. Available from: http://voeikovmgo.ru/index.php/deyatelnost/publik- acii/40-perechen-materialov-izdannykh-ggo (Accessed 24 Jan 2023) (In Russian)