Preview

Radiatsionnaya Gygiena = Radiation Hygiene

Advanced search

Characterization of radiation risk associated with computed tomography for the Russian patients using disability-adjusted life years measure

https://doi.org/10.21514/1998-426X-2023-16-3-37-45

Abstract

adiation risks assessment in medical exposure of patients is one of the mandatory steps in justifying the medical radiological examinations. The main objectives of such assessment are the need for benefit-harm analysis, when prescribing a study, and informing patients or their legal representatives about the radiation risk associated with the recommended examination. The traditional approach to radiation risk assessment is the use of measures based on lifetime morbidity and/or mortality due to radiation exposure in risk characterization. However, the development of the methodology of population health assessment and the need to harmonize the methodology of radiation risk assessment with risks from exposure to factors of other nature imply the use of more informative generalized health indicators in the assessment of exposure to harmful environmental factors. The aim of actual work was to apply the developed methodology of radiation detriment assessment to characterize the risk by calculating DALY (number of years of healthy full life lost due to exposure to ionizing radiation) values for different sex and age groups of Russian patients undergoing computed tomography. To achieve this goal, the previously developed method of estimating the number of years of healthy life lost due to exposure to ionizing radiation was used. Calculations were performed with the use of a specially developed computer program based on the models of the International Commission on Radiological Protection using medical and demographic data of Russian population. The article presents the results of DALY calculation for six types of computed tomographic examinations. The use of DALY to characterize risk instead of the most widely used value of radiation detriment (or lifetime risk of death, relating the harm from the reduction in the quality of life in the case of non-fatal oncological disease) is an attempt to harmonize the methodology of radiation risk assessment with the methodologies of other kind of health risks. One of the directions of calculation results usage is the development of sexand age-dependent risk coefficients associated with medical exposure of patients. The analysis of the obtained results showed that the age distribution of risks agrees well with the data presented in the methodological recommendations MR 2.6.1.0215-20 “Assessment of radiation risk to patients in radiology examinations”. It is also shown that the DALY indicator can serve as a basis for comparative assessment of obtainable and avoidable risks in the field of medical radiation exposure of patients.

About the Authors

L. V. Repin
Saint-Petersburg Research Institute of Radiation Hygiene after Professor P.V. Ramzaev, Federal Service for Surveillance on Consumer Rights Protection and Human Wellbeing
Russian Federation

Junior Researcher, Information Analytical Center, Saint-Petersburg Research Institute of Radiation Hygiene after Professor P.V. Ramzaev, Federal Service for Surveillance on Consumer Rights Protection and Human Well-Being

Mira Str., 8, Saint-Petersburg, 197101



R. R. Akhmatdinov
Saint-Petersburg Research Institute of Radiation Hygiene after Professor P.V. Ramzaev, Federal Service for Surveillance on Consumer Rights Protection and Human Wellbeing
Russian Federation

engineer-researcher, information-analytical center



A. M. Biblin
Saint-Petersburg Research Institute of Radiation Hygiene after Professor P.V. Ramzaev, Federal Service for Surveillance on Consumer Rights Protection and Human Wellbeing
Russian Federation

senior research fellow, head of Information-analytical center



A. V. Vodovatov
Saint-Petersburg Research Institute of Radiation Hygiene after Professor P.V. Ramzaev, Federal Service for Surveillance on Consumer Rights Protection and Human Wellbeing; Saint-Petersburg State Pediatric Medical University
Russian Federation

PhD, lead research fellow, Head of the Laboratory of radiation hygiene of medical facilities



L. A. Chipiga
Saint-Petersburg Research Institute of Radiation Hygiene after Professor P.V. Ramzaev, Federal Service for Surveillance on Consumer Rights Protection and Human Wellbeing; A. Granov Russian Scientific Center of Radiology and Surgical Technologies of the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation; Almazov National Medical Research Centre of the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation
Russian Federation

Ph.D., research fellow, Laboratory of radiation hygiene of medical faciliti



I. G. Shatskiy
Saint-Petersburg Research Institute of Radiation Hygiene after Professor P.V. Ramzaev, Federal Service for Surveillance on Consumer Rights Protection and Human Wellbeing
Russian Federation

research fellow, Laboratory of radiation hygiene of medical facilities



References

1. The 1990 Recommendations of the International Commission on Radiological Protection. ICRP Publication 60. Annals of the ICRP. Pergamon Press. 1991;21 (1-3): 202.

2. The 2007 Recommendations of the International Commission on Radiological Protection. ICRP Publication 103. Annals of the ICRP. 2007;37(2-4): 332.

3. Radiation detriment calculation methodology. ICRP Publication 152. Annals of the ICRP. 2022;51(3): 103.4. Use of dose quantities in radiological protection. ICRP Publication 147. Annals of the ICRP. 2021;50(1): 82 p.

4. Harrison J, Haylock R, Jansen JTM, Zhang W, Wakeford R. Effective doses and risks from medical diagnostic x-ray examinations for male and female patients from childhood to old age. Journal of Radiological Protection. 2023;43(1): 011518. https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6498/acbda7.

5. Andersson M, Eckerman K, Pawel D, Almen A, Mattsson S. Improved radiation risk models applied to different patient groups in Sweden. Radiatsionnaya Gygiena = Radiation Hygiene. 2019;12(2): 44–54. https://doi.org/10.21514/1998-426X-2019-12-2-44-54

6. Mattsson S. Need for individual cancer risk estimates in x-ray and nuclear medicine imaging. Radiation Protection Dosimetry. 2016;169(1-4): 11–16. https://doi.org/10.1093/rpd/ncw034.

7. Golikov VYu, Vodovatov AV, Chipiga LA, Shatsky IG. Evaluation of radiation risk for patients undergoing medical examinations in the Russian Federation. Radiatsionnaya Gygiena = Radiation Hygiene. 2021;14(3): 56–68. https://doi.org/10.21514/1998-426X-2021-14-3-56-68 (In Russian).

8. Repin LV, Akhmatdinov RR, Biblin AM, Repin VS. On harmonization of health risk indicators caused by ionizing radiation exposure and other harmful factors based on DALY estimates. Health Risk Analysis. 2022;1: 162–175. https://doi.org/10.21668/health.risk/2022.1.18.eng.

9. Chen A, Jacobsen KH, Deshmukh AA, Cantor SB. The evolution of the disability-adjusted life year (DALY). Socio-Economic Planning Sciences. 2015;49: 10–15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seps.2014.12.002.

10. Jepsen P, Younossi ZM. The global burden of cirrhosis: A review of disability-adjusted life-years lost and unmet needs. Journal of Hepatology. 2021;75: S3–S13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhep.2020.11.042.

11. Gianino MM, Savatteri A, Politano G, Nurchis MC, Pascucci D, Damiani G. Burden of COVID-19: Disability-Adjusted Life Years (DALYs) across 16 European countries. European Review for Medical & Pharmacological Sciences. 2021;25(17): 5529– 5541. https://doi.org/10.26355/eurrev_202109_26665.

12. Vaillant L, Maitre M, Lafranque E, Schneider T, Wasselin V. Proposal of a quantitative approach integrating radioactive and chemical risks. Radioprotection. 2023;58(2): 147–155. https://doi.org/10.1051/radiopro/2023012.

13. Repin LV. Radiation detriment estimation: on the possibility of effective dose usage to assess the number of years of healthy life lost. Radiatsionnaya Gygiena = Radiation Hygiene. 2023;16(1): 52–65. https://doi.org/10.21514/1998426X-2023-16-1-52-65 (In Russian).

14. Shimada K, Kai M. Calculating disability-adjusted life years (DALY) as a measure of excess cancer risk following radiation exposure. Journal of Radiological Protection. 2015;35(4): 763–775. https://doi.org/10.1088/0952-4746/35/4/763.

15. Repin LV, Akhmatdinov RR, Biblin AM. Calculation of healthy life years lost due to exposure to ionizing radiation for Russian population. Medline.ru. 2023;35: 448–460. (In Russian).

16. NCICT: NCI dosimetry system for Computed Tomography. Available from: https://dceg.cancer.gov/tools/radiation-dosimetry-tools/computed-tomography (Accessed 20.07.2023).

17. Malignant tumors in Russia in 2018 (morbidity and mortality). Moscow; 2019. 250 p. (In Russian).


Review

For citations:


Repin L.V., Akhmatdinov R.R., Biblin A.M., Vodovatov A.V., Chipiga L.A., Shatskiy I.G. Characterization of radiation risk associated with computed tomography for the Russian patients using disability-adjusted life years measure. Radiatsionnaya Gygiena = Radiation Hygiene. 2023;16(3):37-45. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.21514/1998-426X-2023-16-3-37-45

Views: 457


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 1998-426X (Print)
ISSN 2409-9082 (Online)