Results of modern radiation-hygienic surveys of settlements of Bryansk Oblast of the Russian Federation bordering the Republic of Belarus. Part 2: Population’s food preferences (diet)
https://doi.org/10.21514/1998-426X-2023-16-4-7-21
Abstract
This study presents results of radiation-hygienic surveys of the Bryansk Oblast settlements bordering the Republic of Belarus. The data were obtained in the course of implementation of measures of the “Program of joint activities of Russia and Belarus within the framework of the Union State for the protection of the population and rehabilitation of the territories affected by the Chernobyl NPP accident” in 2019–2022. The second part of the study presents structure of population’s food preferences (diet). A general description of the diets of residents is given and the main types of local food products at the present stage of the radiation accident are identified. The current levels of consumption of locally produced food (and products of local origin) by residents of different age categories have been assessed. The obtained results of assessing the levels of food consumption have been compared with our own results of earlier studies and with the results of studies on the population of Russia and Belarus. Similarly with previous years, among agricultural food products the most consumed products are milk and potatoes and among natural food products are mushrooms. The established levels of consumption of local dairy products and beef have decreased over the past ten years and the resident consumptions of mushrooms and potatoes are in the same levels as before.
About the Authors
I. K. RomanovichRussian Federation
Ivan K. Romanovich – Doctor of Medical Sciences, Professor, Academician of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Director
Saint Petersburg
A. B. Bazyukin
Russian Federation
Anatoly B. Bazyukin – Candidate of Biological Sciences, Leading Researcher of the Laboratory of Internal Irradiation
Saint Petersburg
A. A. Bratilova
Russian Federation
Anzhelika A. Bratilova – Head of the Laboratory of Internal Exposure
Address for correspondence: Mira str., 8, Saint-Petersburg, 197101, Russia
G. Ya. Bruk
Russian Federation
Gennadiy Ya. Bruk
– Candidate of Technical Sciences, Head of the Laboratory of Internal Irradiation
Saint Petersburg
K. V. Varfolomeeva
Russian Federation
Ksenia V. Varfolomeeva – junior researcher of the ecology laboratory
Saint Petersburg
E. A. Drozdova
Russian Federation
Elena A. Drozdova – Leading Research Engineer, Laboratory of Dosimetry of Natural Source
Saint Petersburg
T. V. Zhesko
Russian Federation
Tatiana V. Zhesko – Candidate of Biological Sciences, Senior Researcher of the Laboratory of Internal Irradiation
Saint Petersburg
M. V. Kaduka
Russian Federation
Marina V. Kaduka – Candidate of Biological Sciences, Leading Researcher, Head of the Radiochemical Laboratory
Saint Petersburg
T. A. Kormanovskaya
Russian Federation
Tatyana A. Kormanovskaya – Candidate of Biological Sciences, Leading Researcher of the Laboratory of Dosimetry of Natural Sources
Saint Petersburg
O. S. Kravtsova
Russian Federation
Olga S. Kravtsova – Candidate of Biological Sciences, Leading Researcher of the Laboratory of Internal Irradiation
Saint Petersburg
A. V. Kudryashov
Russian Federation
Alexander V. Kudryashov – chief physician of the branch of the Center of Hygiene and Epidemiology in Klintsy
Klintsy, Bryansk region
A. A. Ladik
Russian Federation
Andrey A. Ladik – expert-physicist on control over sources of ionizing and non-ionizing radiation
Klintsy, Bryansk region
V. A. Lalayan
Russian Federation
Vartan A. Lalayan – Deputy Chief Doctor for Sanitary and Epidemiological Issues
Klintsy, Bryansk region
References
1. Romanovich IK, Bazyukin AB, Barkovsky AN, Biblin АМ, Bratilova AA, Bruk GYa et al. Results of modern radiationhygienic surveys of settlements of Bryansk Oblast of the Russian Federation bordering the Republic of Belarus. Part 1: Characteristics of the settlements. Radiatsionnaya Gygiena = Radiation Hygien. 2023;16(3):; 23-36. (In Russian).
2. International Commission on Radiological Protection. Radiological protection of people and the environment in the event of a large nuclear accident: update of ICRP Publications 109 and 111. ICRP Publication 146. Annals of the ICRP. 2020;49(4).
3. Travnikova IG, Balonov MI, Kaplun IS. Diet of residents of Bryansk region western areas and it’s variation resulted from the Chernobyl accident. In: Problems of mitigating the consequences of the Chernobyl disaster: materials of an international seminar. Part I. Bryansk: Znanie; 1993. P.132–4. (In Russian).
4. Bratilova AA, Bruk GYa. Influence of the consumption of different foodstuffs on the internal exposure dose formation in the adult population of the Russian federation after the accident at the Chernobyl NPP. Radiatsionnaya Gygiena = Radiation Hygiene. 2018;11(2): 53–59. (In Russian).
5. Reshetnikova NV. Personal planning in the structure of the agro-food complex of Russia: historical background to formation and the present state. Mezhdunarodnyy selskokhozyaystvennyy zhurnal = International Agricultural Journal. 2022; 65(2(386)): 120–123. (In Russian).
6. Serova E, Karlova N. Russian Federation: Market of milk and dairy products. Rome: FAO; 2010. (In Russian).
7. Nikalaenka EV. Justification of approaches for assessing a representative person model for radiation protection of the population around the Belarusian NPP, In: Health and Environment: Collection of Scientific Works. Minsk: RSML; 2017. P. 40–44. (In Russian).
8. Household food consumption in 2020 (results of Household Budget Sample Survey). Moscow: Federal State Statistics Service; 2021. (In Russian).
9. Medvedev IV (ed.). Social status and standard of living of population in the Republic of Belarus. Statistical survey. Minsk: National Statistical Committee of the Republic of Belarus; 2021. 250 p. (In Russian).
10. Consumption of basic food products by the population of the Russian Federation. Moscow: Federal State Statistics Service (Rosstat); 2021. (In Russian).
11. Azovskaya NO, Peretrukhin VV, Chernushevich GA. Research of the degree of radioactive contamination of food forest products and its contribution to the radiation burden of the population. Proceedings of the Belarusian State Technological University. 2018;1(2): 251–8. (In Russian).
12. Chernushevich GA, Azovskaya NO, Domnenkova AV, Kiselev SV. Analysis of the influence of radioactive contamination of non-timber forest resources on the internal exposure of the population. Proceedings of the Belarusian State Technological University. 2021;1(2): 298–305. (In Russian).
13. Panov AV, Marochkina EV, Ponomarenko VV. On the role of mushrooms in the internal dose formation to the population in the Chernobyl NPP accident affected areas. Radiatsionnaya Gygiena = Radiation Hygiene. 2014;7(1): 63–70. (In Russian).
14. Russians are consuming less and less dairy products. Available from: https://milknews.ru/analitika-rinka-moloka/rinokmolokavRossii/Rossijane_potrebljajut_vse_menshe_molochnoj_produkcii.html (Accessed 30.04.2023). (In Russian).
15. Martischenkova EV. Level of the rural population awareness about the rules for consuming products from rivers and reservoirs in regions affected by the Chernobyl accident. In: Modern problems of radiation medicine: from science to practice. Gomel: State Institution Republican Scientific and Practical Center for Radiation Medicine and Human Ecology; 2020. P. 38–39. (In Russian).
16. Podvalskaya VS. Level of public awareness about ways to reduce radionuclides concentration in wild plants, berries and mushrooms (based on the results of a sociological survey of the rural population of areas affected by the Chernobyl accident). In: Modern problems of radiation medicine: from science to practice. Gomel: State Institution Republican Scientific and Practical Center for Radiation Medicine and Human Ecology; 2020. P. 44–45. (In Russian).
17. Onishchenko GG, Popova AYu. (eds.). Radiological and hygienic issues of the mitigation of the Chernobyl NPP accident consequences. Saint Petersburg: Federal Scientific Organization Saint Petersburg Research Institute of Radiation Hygiene after Professor P.V. Ramzaev; 2016. Vol. 1. 448 p. (In Russian).
18. Tsygvintsev PN, Tsurankov EN. Influence of information of the rural population on the formation of doses of internal radiation. In: Radioecological consequences of radiation accidents: Collection of reports of the international scientific and practical conference to the 35th anniversary of the Chernobyl accident. Obninsk: Federal State Budgetary Institution “AllRussian Research Institute of Radiology and Agroecology”; 2021. P. 383–387. (In Russian).
19. Aheyeva TN, Miarzlova VA. On radiation doses to the population of the Mogilev region in zones of radioactive contamination. In: Radioecological consequences of radiation accidents: Collection of reports of the international scientific and practical conference to the 35th anniversary of the Chernobyl accident. Obninsk: Federal State Budgetary Institution “AllRussian Research Institute of Radiology and Agroecology”; 2021. P. 166–168. (In Russian).
20. Jacoba P, Fesenko S, Firsakova SK, Likhtarev IA, Schotola C, Alexakhin RM, et al. Remediation strategies for rural territories contaminated by the Chernobyl accident. Journal of Environmental Radioactivity. 2001;56: 51–76.
21. Natural resources and environment of the Bryansk region: Annual report on the environmental situation in the Bryansk region in 2018. Bryansk: Department of Natural Resources and Ecology of the Bryansk Region; 2019. 266 p. (In Russian).
22. Natural resources and environment of the Bryansk region: Annual report on the environmental situation in the Bryansk region in 2019. Bryansk: Department of Natural Resources and Ecology of the Bryansk Region; 2020. 276 p. (In Russian).
23. Natural resources and environment of the Bryansk region: Annual report on the environmental situation in the Bryansk region in 2020. Bryansk: Department of Natural Resources and Ecology of the Bryansk Region; 2021. 253 p. (In Russian).
24. Nilova EK, Bortnovsky VN, Tagai SA, Dudareva NV, Nikitin AN. Assessment of the current levels of 241Am and 137Сs in soils and foodstuff, as well as of public internal exposure to ionizing radiation in populated areas adjacent to the Chernobyl NPP exclusion zone (case study: the Bragin district of the Gomel region, Belarus). Radiatsionnaya Gygiena = Radiation Hygiene. 2020;13(3): 25–37. (In Russian).
25. Nilova EK, Bortnovsky VN, Tagai SA, Dudareva NV, Nikitin AN. 241Am and 137Сs in the Khoiniki district of Belarus: updated radiological assessment of the local existing exposure situation. Radiatsionnaya Gygiena = Radiation Hygiene. 2021;14(4): 17–30. (In Russian).
Review
For citations:
Romanovich I.K., Bazyukin A.B., Bratilova A.A., Bruk G.Ya., Varfolomeeva K.V., Drozdova E.A., Zhesko T.V., Kaduka M.V., Kormanovskaya T.A., Kravtsova O.S., Kudryashov A.V., Ladik A.A., Lalayan V.A. Results of modern radiation-hygienic surveys of settlements of Bryansk Oblast of the Russian Federation bordering the Republic of Belarus. Part 2: Population’s food preferences (diet). Radiatsionnaya Gygiena = Radiation Hygiene. 2023;16(4):7-21. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.21514/1998-426X-2023-16-4-7-21