Estimation of the protected zone sizes for peaceful nuclear explosions based on quantitative patterns of the Earth’s interior deformation
https://doi.org/10.21514/1998-426X-2023-16-4-134-147
Abstract
The designation of peaceful nuclear explosions as special radioactive waste imposes serious requirements to the territory of the explosion, its boundaries, and stakeholders informing about the prohibition of economic activities within these boundaries. The acting Sanitary Norms and Rules SanPiN 2.6.1.2819–10 “Ensuring radiation safety of the population living in areas where nuclear explosions were conducted (1965–1988) for peaceful purposes” do not define the size of the boundaries of protected zones. The aim of this paper is to analyze the scientific literature on the structure of deformation changes in the Earth’s interior due to peaceful nuclear explosions and to justify quantitative ratios on the basis of which the size of protected zones can be estimated. The quantitative ratios were selected on the basis of a comparative analysis of the literature data. Using the ratios values made it possible to calculate the radii of deformation changes (cavities, crushing zones, fracturing zones, and zones of residual deformations) in various rocks. It is shown that the maximum values of fracturing radii for peaceful nuclear explosions carried out on the territory of the Russian Federation in hard rocks and in plastic rocks do not exceed 200 m and 250 m, respectively.
Keywords
protected zone,
peaceful nuclear explosions,
underground nuclear explosions,
special radioactive waste,
rock formations,
explosion cavity,
cracking,
crushing zone,
destruction zone
Supporting agencies: The work was carried out within the framework of the sectoral program of Rospotrebnadzor for 2021–2025. “Scientific substantiation of the national system for ensuring sanitary and epidemiological wellbeing, managing health risks and improving the quality of life of the population of Russia” on the topic: “Improving and developing methods for monitoring environmental objects in areas where peaceful nuclear explosions are carried out. Radiation–hygienic characteristics of sources of drinking water supply.”
About the Authors
V. S. Repin
Saint-Petersburg Research Institute of Radiation Hygiene after Professor P.V. Ramzaev, Federal Service for Surveillance on Consumer Rights Protection and Human Wellbeing
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Viktor S. Repin – Doctor of Biological Sciences, Head of Ecology Laboratory
Address for correspondence: Mira Str., 8, Saint Petersburg, 197101, Russia
V. P. Ramzaev
Saint-Petersburg Research Institute of Radiation Hygiene after Professor P.V. Ramzaev, Federal Service for Surveillance on Consumer Rights Protection and Human Wellbeing
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Valery P. Ramzaev – Candidate of Medical Sciences, Leading Researcher, External Exposure Laboratory
Saint Petersburg
A. M. Biblin
Saint-Petersburg Research Institute of Radiation Hygiene after Professor P.V. Ramzaev, Federal Service for Surveillance on Consumer Rights Protection and Human Wellbeing
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Artem M. Biblin – senior research fellow, head of Information-analytical center
Saint Petersburg
K. V. Varfolomeeva
Saint-Petersburg Research Institute of Radiation Hygiene after Professor P.V. Ramzaev, Federal Service for Surveillance on Consumer Rights Protection and Human Wellbeing
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Kseniya V. Varfolomeeva – Junior Researcher of the Laboratory of Ecology
Saint Petersburg
S. V. Zelentsova
Saint-Petersburg Research Institute of Radiation Hygiene after Professor P.V. Ramzaev, Federal Service for Surveillance on Consumer Rights Protection and Human Wellbeing
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Svetlana A. Zelentsova – Junior Researcher of the Laboratory of Ecology
Saint Petersburg
K. A. Sednev
Saint-Petersburg Research Institute of Radiation Hygiene after Professor P.V. Ramzaev, Federal Service for Surveillance on Consumer Rights Protection and Human Wellbeing
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Konstantin A. Sednev – Acting Junior Researcher
Saint Petersburg
V. A. Ilyichev
ROSATOM State Atomic Energy Corporation, Joint-stock company VNIPIpromtekhnologii
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Vyacheslav A. Ilyichev – Candidate of Chemical Sciences, Leading Researcher
Moscow
A. V. Kasatkin
ROSATOM State Atomic Energy Corporation, Joint-stock company VNIPIpromtekhnologii
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Vladimir V. Kasatkin – Candidate of Technical Sciences, head of the radiation safety laboratory
Moscow
V. V. Kasatkin
ROSATOM State Atomic Energy Corporation, Joint-stock company VNIPIpromtekhnologii
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Andrey V. Kasatkin – Head of department
Moscow
References
1. Biblin AM, Khramtsov EV, Repin VS, Ivanov SA, Varfolomeeva KV, Sednev KA, et al. Radiation situation at the “Pirit” peaceful underground nuclear explosion site. Radiatsionnaya Gygiena = Radiation Hygiene. 2022;15(4): 149–161. DOI: 10.21514/1998–426X–2022–15–4–149–161. (In Russian).
2. Ramzaev VP, Biblin AM, Repin VS, Khramtsov EV, Varfolomeeva KV. Tritium contamination of surface and ground waters at the “Dnepr” peaceful underground nuclear explosions site. Radiatsionnaya Gygiena = Radiation Hygiene. 2022;15(1): 6–26. DOI: 10.21514/1998–426X– 2022–15–1–6–26. (In Russian).
3. Ramzaev VP, Repin VS, Khramtsov EV. Peaceful underground nuclear explosions: current issues on radiation safety for general public. Radiatsionnaya Gygiena = Radiation Hygiene. 2009;2(2):27–33. (In Russian).
4. Ramzaev VP, Travnikova IG, Basalaeva LN, Bruk GYa, Golikov VYu, Mishin AS, et al. On influence of the underground nuclear explosions Crystal and Kraton–3 on radiological situation in the nearest settlements. Radiatsionnaya Gygiena = Radiation Hygiene. 2008;1(2):14–19. (In Russian).
5. Ramzaev V, Repin V, Medvedev A, Khramtsov E, Timofeeva M, Yakovlev V. Radiological investigations at the “Taiga” nuclear explosion site, part II: man–made X–ray emitting radionuclides in the ground and the resultant kerma rate in air. Journal of Environmental Radioactivity, 2011;102(7): 672–80. DOI: 10.1016/j.jenvrad.2011.04.003
6. Khramtsov EV, Repin VS, Biblin AM, Varfolomeeva KV, Ivanov SA. Radiation–hygienic characteristic of the protected zones of peaceful nuclear explosions in the Arkhangelsk region. Radiatsionnaya Gygiena = Radiation Hygiene. 2021;14(1): 111–123. (In Russian.) DOI: 10.21514/1998–426X–2021–14–1–111–123.
7. Arkhipov VN, Borisov VA, Budkov AM, Valko VV, Galiev AM, Goncharova OP, et al. Mechanical Action of Nuclear Explosion. Ministry of Defense of the Russian Federation. Central Institute of Physics and Technology. Moscow: FIZMATLIT; 2003. 382 p. (In Russian).
8. Vasiliev AP, Dubasov YuV, Ilyichev VA, Kasatkin VV, Myasnikov KV, Prihodko NK, et al. Nuclear explosive technologies: experiments and industrial applications. Snezhinsk: RFNC– VNITF; 2017. 508 p. (In Russian).
9. Adushkin VV, Spivak AA. Underground explosions. Moscow: Nauka; 2007. 585 p. (In Russian).
10. Adushkin VV, Spivak AA, Chernyshev AK. Physical view of the underground nuclear explosion. For the benefit of Russia. To the 75th anniversary of Academician of the Russian Academy of Sciences YuA Trutnev. 2002. p. 170-194. (In Russian).
11. Sadovsky MA. Selected works: Geophysics and physics of explosion. Moscow: Nauka; 2004. 439 p. (In Russian).
12. Boardmen ChR. Engineering effects of underground nuclear explosions. Proc. Symp. Eng. Nucl. Explos. Las Vegas, Nev.; 1970. Vol. 1. Springfield. 1970. P. 43–67.
13. Artamonova SY, Kozhevnikov NO, Antonov EY. Permafrost and groundwater settings at the site of “Kraton–3” peaceful underground nuclear explosion (Yakutia), from TEM data. Geologiya i geofizika = Russian Geology and Geophysics. 2013;54(5): 555–565. (In Russian). DOI: 10.1016/j.rgg.2013.04.007.
14. Clossman PJ. On the prediction of cavity radius produced by an underground nuclear explosion. Journal of Geographical Research. 1969;74(15): 3935–3939. DOI: 10.1029/JB074i015p03935.
15. Nuclear Tests of the USSR. Volume 4. Application of Nuclear Explosions for Solving National Economic Problems and Scientific Research. Sarov: RFNC-VNIIEF; 2000. 200 p. (In Russian).
16. Vasiliev AP. Nuclear explosive technologies in peaceful nuclear explosions. Proceedings of the XIII International Conference. 2017. Russian Federal Nuclear Center – All– Russian Research Institute of Technical Physics named after E.I. Zababakhin. Snezhinsk, March 20–24, 2017. 10 p. (In Russian).
17. Kasatkin VV, Kasatkin AV, Ilyichev VA, Sedov NS, Samorodova TS. Stages for reclassifying Globus-1 peaceful nuclear explosion object as a site for preserving special radwastes. Atomnaya energiya = Atomic Energy. 2014;116(3): 157–161. (In Russian). DOI: 10.1007/s10512-014-9841-0.
18. Kasatkin VV, Ilyichev VA, Klishin VI. Creation of the sanitary protection zone of the Taiga object. Bezopasnost okruzhayushchey sredy = Environmental Safety. 2009;(4): 88–91. (In Russian).
19. Klishin VI, Prikhodko NK, Kamnev EN, Kasatkin VV, Ilyichev VA. Main statements of the concept of special mining allotment around the central zones of underground nuclear explosions. Proceedings of the International Conference Radioactivity after Nuclear Explosions and Accidents. Moscow, December 5-6, 2005, Vol. 3. Impact of radioactive contamination on anthropogenic and agricultural ecosystems. Doses to the population as a result of radioactive contamination of the environment in nuclear explosions and accidents. Strategies and Countermeasures. St. Petersburg; 2006. P. 444–448. (In Russian).
20. Special radioactive waste. IBRAE RAS. Moscow: SAM Polygraphist LLC; 2015. 240 p. (In Russian).
21. Kasatkin VV, Kasatkin AV, Vasilenko EM, Samorodova TS, Sedov NS. The concept of treatment of special radioactive waste (RW) – peaceful nuclear explosions (PNES). Vestnik RAEN = Bulletin of the RANS. 2017;17(2): 39–42. (In Russian).
22. Kasatkin VV, Ilyichev VA, Kamnev EN, Kasatkin AV. Expert assessment of radiation risk of objects of peaceful nuclear explosions (PNE) on the basis selected empirical criteria. Gornyy informatsionno–analiticheskiy byulleten = Mining informational and analytical bulletin. 2013;(8): 196–201. (In Russian).
23. Kasatkin VV, Ilyichev VA, Kamnev EN, Kasatkin AV, Samorodova TS. Geological and radioecological problems of the objects formed by peaceful nuclear explosions – special radwaste repositories. Atomnaya energiya = Atomic Energy. 2012;113(5): 289–293. (In Russian).
24. Dubasov YV. Egress and outflow of radioactive noble gases in varied–purpose underground nuclear explosions. Radiokhimiya = Radiochemistry. 2021;63:851–860. (In Russian). DOI: 10.1134/S1066362221060187.
25. Abramson MG, Baidyuk BV, Zaretsky VS, Kirsanova AT, Matveeva AM, Pyankov NYa, et al. Reference book on mechanical and abrasive properties of rocks of oil and gas fields. Moscow: Nedra; 1984. 207 p. (In Russian).
26. Kapitonov AM, Vasiliev VG. Physical properties of rocks of the western part of the Siberian Platform. Krasnoyarsk: Siberian federal university; 2011. 424 p. (In Russian).
27. Reference book on drilling and blasting operations. Edited by Drukovanyi MF. Moscow: Nedra; 1976. 631 p. (In Russian).
28. Reference book (cadastre) of physical properties of rocks. Edited by Melnikov NV, Rzhevsky VV, Protodyakov MM. Moscow: Nedra; 1975. 279 p. (In Russian).
29. Rzhevskiy VV, Novik GYa. Fundamentals of rock physics: Textbook for universities. 4th ed. Moscow: Nedra; 1984. 379 p. (In Russian).
30. Timoshenko SP, Gere J. Mechanics of materials: textbook for universities. 2nd ed. Saint-Petersburg: “Lan”; 2002. 672 p. (In Russian).
Review
For citations:
Repin V.S., Ramzaev V.P., Biblin A.M., Varfolomeeva K.V., Zelentsova S.V., Sednev K.A., Ilyichev V.A., Kasatkin A.V., Kasatkin V.V. Estimation of the protected zone sizes for peaceful nuclear explosions based on quantitative patterns of the Earth’s interior deformation. Radiatsionnaya Gygiena = Radiation Hygiene. 2023;16(4):134-147. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.21514/1998-426X-2023-16-4-134-147
Views:
458
Email this article 