80 years of nuclear industry and the role of radiation hygiene
https://doi.org/10.21514/1998-426X-2025-18-4-162-170
Abstract
This overview article examines the key milestones in the development of an effective system for radiation safety in Russia covering all aspects of modern life, including through the establishment of independent scientific organizations. Evolvement of nuclear industry and the development of radiation safety requirements proceeded in parallel drawing both on national research and development and, of course, global trends and recommendations in the field of standardization. Today, it can be confidently stated that Russia operates a reliable system providing radiation safety of people. Actual doses, even when estimated conservatively, are much lower than the regulatory limits. However, certain revision of some key regulations in line with the latest international approaches is required to enhance the competitiveness of nuclear industry, which is hindered by the requirements of the Federal Law No. 3-FZ On Radiation Safety of January 9, 1996 no longer corresponding to present day developments. Despite numerous publications and studies, some issues remain unresolved regarding both the establishment of derived radiation safety indicators and the fundamental dose limits. Another persisting problem is related to the lack of clearly defined criteria based on which the necessity of site remediation can be declared, as well as end-state criteria for decommissioned nuclear legacy facilities. Russia still adheres to the principle of dose limits that are stricter than the basic dose limit even in case of existing exposure. This article addresses the problem of the annual effective dose limit set for the critical group of population in the context of radioactive waste disposal; the limit is between 500 and 10,000 times lower than the one recommended by international organizations. This, in turn, hinders the development of an effective waste disposal system, slows down the construction of disposal facilities and the decommissioning of legacy facilities.
About the Authors
L. A. BolshovRussian Federation
Leonid A. Bolshov – Member of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Professor, Doctor of Physical and Mathematical Sciences, Head of Research
Moscow
I. I. Linge
Russian Federation
Igor I. Linge – Doctor of Technical Sciences, Adviser
52, Bolshaya Tulskaya str., Moscow, 115191
S. V. Panchenko
Russian Federation
Sergey V. Panchenko – Senior Researcher
Moscow
References
1. Bolshov LA, Arutyunyan RV, Linge II, Abalkina IL. Nuclear Accidents: Consequences for Human, Society and Energy Sector. Radiatsionnaya gygiena = Radiation Hygiene, 2016;9(3): 43–52. (In Russian). DOI: 10.21514/1998-426Х-2016-9-3-43-52.
2. Selected Materials of the Bulletin of Radiation Medicine. Moscow: A.I. Burnasyan FMBC Publ.; 2016. P. 70–76. (In Russian).
3. Panfilov A. Historical Aspects of the Creation and Development of the Main Facilities of the Country’s Nuclear Industry. Radiation Exposure to Personnel in Different Time Periods. ANRI = ANRI. 2020;3: 3–25. (In Russian).
4. Decision of the industry scientific and practical seminar "Radiation Safety in the Nuclear Industry" 28.07.2025 1.08.2025. Irkutsk: Letter of the State Corporation Rosatom dated 01.08.2025. (In Russian).
5. Vedernikova MV, Linge II, Panchenko SV, Strizhova SV, Supotaeva OA, Utkin SS. On the issue of amendments to the Federal Law of January 9, 1996 No.3-FZ “On radiation safety of population”. (Preprint Nuclear Safety Institute RAS, № IBRAE-2020-03). Moscow: Nuclear Safety Institute RAS; 2020. 22 p. ISBN 978-5-6041296-5-4. (In Russian).
6. Radiation Protection and Safety of Radiation Sources: International Basic Safety Standards. № GSR Part 3. Vienna: IAEA; 2014. P. 471.
7. ICRP. The 2007 Recommendations of the International Commission on Radiological Protection. ICRP Publication 103. Annals of the ICRP. 2007;37(2-4). (In Russian).
8. Radiation Situation in the Russian Federation in 2023. Handbook. St. Petersburg; 2024. (In Russian).
9. Romanovich IK. Actual Tasks in Radiation Hygiene in the Context of FTP NRS Results. Proceeding of the Jubilee X Russian Scientific Conference «Radiation Protection and Radiation Safety in Nuclear Technologies». Moscow; 2015. P. 97–110. (In Russian).
10. Burnazyan AI, Ramzaev PV, Moiseev AA. Prospects for Radiation Hygiene. Gigiena i sanitariya = Hygiene and Sanitation, 1969;10: 8-14. (In Russian).
11. Arakelyan AA. A Comprehensive Method for Safety assessment the Radiation Safety and Environmental Acceptability of Nuclear Facilities. A PhD dissertation. Moscow; 2024. P. 144. (In Russian).
12. Panchenko SV, Novikov SM, Shashina TA, Arakelyan AA. Ranking of radiation and chemical risks to public health, problems and solutions. "Environmental, industrial and energy safety - 2018". Collection of articles from the international scientific and practical conference, September 24-27, 2018. Sevastopol; 2018. 1315 p. (In Russian).
13. Abalkina IL, Panchenko SV, Savkin MN, Vedernikova MV, Kryshev II. Socially and Ecologically Acceptable Criteria for Remediation of Contaminated Areas of Non-Retrievable Waste Facilities. Voprosy radiatsionnoi bezopasnosti = Journal of Radiation Safety Issues. 2017;87(3): 46–52. (In Russian).
14. Linge II, Utkin SS. Radiation and Environmental Aspects of Advanced Nuclear Energy. Meditsinskaya radiologiya i radiatsionnaya bezopasnost = Medical Radiology and Radiation Safety. 2021;66(5): 113-121. (In Russian). DOI: 10.12737/1024-6177-2021-66-5-113-121.
15. Linge II. On the Role of Radiation Hygiene in the Development of Radioactive Waste Management Systems. In: Current Issues in Radiation Hygiene. Proceedings of the All-Russian Scientific and Practical Conference with International Participation. St. Petersburg; 2023. P. 198-202. (In Russian).
16. Narkevich BYa. Current Radioactive Waste Management Challenges in Nuclear Medicine. Radioaktivnye otkhody = Radioactive Waste. 2022;1(18): 28—37. (In Russian). DOI: 10.25283/2587-9707-2022-1-28-37.
17. Linge II. Streamlining RW management and radiation safety systems. Radioaktivnye otkhody = Radioactive Waste. 2023;2(23): 21—34. (In Russian). DOI: 10.25283/2587-9707-2023-2-21-34.
18. Abalkina IL, Bolshov LA, Kapyrin IV, Linge II, Saveleva EA, Svitelman VS, et al. Radioactive waste and spent nuclear fuel deep geological disposal long-term safety assessment for 10 000 years and over: methodology and current state. Preprint IBRAE-2019-03. Moscow: Nuclear Safety Institute; 2019. 40 p. (In Russian).
19. Joint Convention on the Safety of Spent Fuel Management and on the Safety of Radioactive Waste Management. International Atomic Energy Agency. Vienna; 1997. P. 36. Available from: https://www.iaea.org/sites/default/files/infcirc546.pdf [Accessed October 22, 2025]. (In Russian).
20. Radiological Protection in Geological Disposal of Long-Lived Solid Radioactive Waste. ICRP Publication 122. Annals of the ICRP. 2013;42(3).
Review
For citations:
Bolshov L.A., Linge I.I., Panchenko S.V. 80 years of nuclear industry and the role of radiation hygiene. Radiatsionnaya Gygiena = Radiation Hygiene. 2025;18(4):162-170. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.21514/1998-426X-2025-18-4-162-170
JATS XML






























