Preview

Radiatsionnaya Gygiena = Radiation Hygiene

Advanced search

Issues of the ensuring of radiation control testing laboratories correspondence to accreditation criteria

https://doi.org/10.21514/1998-426X-2025-18-4-94-102

Abstract

The new accreditation system has created rather stringent conditions for laboratories and necessitated strict adherence to a number of provisions to ensure accredited entities meet accreditation criteria. Testing laboratories or testing laboratory centers that perform radiation control conduct testing for the mandatory confirmation (assessment) of compliance. Accreditation in the national accreditation system, Rosaccreditation, is a prerequisite for the operation of testing laboratories performing such work. This article lists the laws and regulations governing the activities of laboratories accredited in the national accreditation system, presents the accreditation criteria requirements applicable to radiation control laboratories, and describes optimal methods for ensuring laboratories meet these requirements. It also lists documents that can be included in a testing laboratory's quality management system. Approaches to developing certain elements of a quality management system in light of the requirements of new Rosaccreditation documents are described. Aspects of the risk-based approach required for accredited testing laboratories in today's environment are explained. Examples of personnel supervision and competency monitoring procedures are provided. It was noted that in today's environment, special attention should be paid to improving the qualifications and competence of personnel. Currently, numerous training platforms exist, including free webinars, dedicated to approaches to ensuring testing laboratories' compliance with specific accreditation criteria. These platforms provide information on amendments to laws and regulations regarding requirements for accredited entities, answers to questions that arise during the practical implementation of testing laboratories' own approaches to building their quality management system as a whole and its individual components, and the opportunity to gain new knowledge and competencies.

About the Authors

M. V. Kaduka
Saint Petersburg Research Institute of Radiation Hygiene after Professor P.V. Ramzaev, Federal Service for Surveillance of Consumer Rights Protection and Human Wellbeing
Russian Federation

Marina V. Kaduka – Candidate of Biological Sciences, Leading Researcher, Head of the Radiochemical Laboratory

8, Mira Str., Saint Petersburg, 19710



T. A. Bekyasheva
Saint Petersburg Research Institute of Radiation Hygiene after Professor P.V. Ramzaev, Federal Service for Surveillance of Consumer Rights Protection and Human Wellbeing
Russian Federation

Tamara A. Bekyasheva – Lead Research Engineer Radiochemical Laboratory 

Saint Petersburg



S. A. Ivanov
Saint Petersburg Research Institute of Radiation Hygiene after Professor P.V. Ramzaev, Federal Service for Surveillance of Consumer Rights Protection and Human Wellbeing
Russian Federation

Sergey A. Ivanov – Junior Research Fellow Radiochemical Laboratory 

Saint Petersburg



V. V. Stupina
Saint Petersburg Research Institute of Radiation Hygiene after Professor P.V. Ramzaev, Federal Service for Surveillance of Consumer Rights Protection and Human Wellbeing
Russian Federation

Veronika V. Stupina – Lead Research Engineer Radiochemical Laboratory 

Saint Petersburg



References

1. Skripko LE. Formation of views on quality management. Vestnik Sankt-Peterburgskogo universiteta. Menedzhment = Bulletin of St. Petersburg University. Management. 2022;21(3): 395–428. DOI: 10.21638/11701/spbu08.2022.304. (In Russian).

2. ISO/IEC 17025/2017: what the upcoming GOST has in store for us. Author: Andrey Gorbunov. Available from: https://kachestvo.pro/kachestvo-produktsii/ispytaniya-i-izmereniya/iso-mek-17025-2017-chto-gost-gryadushchiy-nam-gotovit/ (Accessed October 15, 2025) (In Russian).

3. Borzov VI. Application of risk management for the implementation of risk-oriented thinking in the quality management system. Izvestiya Tulskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Tekhnicheskie nauki = Bulletin of Tula State University. Technical sciences. - 2022. - No. 8. - Pp. 7-10. - DOI 10.24412/2071-6168-2022-8-7-10.8. (In Russian).

4. Zhemchugov AM, Zhemchugov MK. Management of the XXI century. Retrospective and prospect (part 2). Menedzhment segodnya = Management today. 2024;4: 262-277. Available from: https://grebennikon.ru/article-4emb.html (Accessed October 15, 2025) (In Russian).

5. Gorbunov AV. Risk management in the ISO 9001:2015 standard. Menedzhment kachestva = Quality management. 2018;4: 262–271. URL: https://grebennikon.ru/article-3dvh.html (Accessed October 15, 2025) (In Russian).

6. Kartvelishvili VM, Sviridova OA. Risk management. Risk assessment methods. Moscow: Plekhanov Russian University of Economics; 2017. 120 p. (In Russian).

7. Romanycheva KS, Spiridonov DM. Typical risks and capabilities of the measuring instrument verification process. International youth scientific conference "Physics. Technologies. Innovations." Ekaterinburg. May 18-22; 2020. P. 260-267 (In Russian).

8. Badalova AG, Tokhunts NB. Regulation of risk management processes in modern risk management. Vestnik MGTU «Stankin» = Bulletin of MSTU "Stankin". 2021;1(56): 118-124 (In Russian).

9. Lyubimova TA. Internal control and risk management System: towards maturity. Menedzhment kachestva = Quality management. 2018;4: 254-260. Available from: https://grebennikon.ru/article-q4ol.html (Accessed October 15, 2025) (In Russian).

10.


Review

For citations:


Kaduka M.V., Bekyasheva T.A., Ivanov S.A., Stupina V.V. Issues of the ensuring of radiation control testing laboratories correspondence to accreditation criteria. Radiatsionnaya Gygiena = Radiation Hygiene. 2025;18(4):94-102. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.21514/1998-426X-2025-18-4-94-102

Views: 30

JATS XML


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 1998-426X (Print)
ISSN 2409-9082 (Online)