Analysis of solid cancer incidence risk among the population exposed in the East Urals Radioactive Trace over 1957–2009

Objective: Assessment of solid cancer incidence risk in the Chelyabinsk subcohort of the East Urals Radioactive Trace over the 53-year period of follow-up with use of the individualized doses accumulated in the soft tissues calculated on the basis of the new dosimetric system TRDS-2016. Materials and methods: The thermal explosion of the storage tank of the «Mayak» production Association radioactive waste in September, 1957 led to the formation of the East Urals Radioactive Trace and radiation exposure of the population living on the territory of the trace. Members of the created cohort received chronic external and internal radiation exposure. The mean dose to the soft tissues over the entire follow-up period amounted to 30 mGy, maximum – 960 mGy. The number of the study cohort is 21 394 persons. Over 53 years (from 1957 to 2009) 1426 cases of solid cancer excluding 73 hemoblastoses and 101 cases of  non-melanoma skin cancer are registered in the cohort on the catchment area. Person-years at risk amount to 437 719. Individualized doses for the cohort members were evaluated on the basis of the improved dosimetric system developed by the specialists of the Urals Research Center for Radiation Medicine. The analysis was carried
out by means of the Poisson regression method with the use of the software AMFIT. Confidence intervals were calculated using the maximum likelihood estimation. Results: Risk analysis of solid cancer incidence in Chelyabinsk subcohort of the East Urals Radioactive Trace has been carried out for the first time. A significant increase in solid cancer incidence risk with increasing the dose was obtained for the cohort members who were followed-up for 53 years. The excess relative risk per dose is 0.049/100mGy (90% of DI: 0.003; 0.010) according to the linear model. No significant effect modification of the excess relative risk value due to non-radiation factors was revealed. The results of the study demonstrate that the value of excess relative risk of solid cancer incidence per unit dose after chronic exposure at low or moderate doses can be compared to that at high doses.

ionizing radiation, the East Urals Radioactive Trace, cohort, solid cancer, solid cancer incidence risk, excess relative risk

1. Burnazyan А.I. The results of the study and experience of consequences liquidation of emergency contamination of the territory by the fission products of uranium. М., Energoatomizdat, 1990, 144 p. (In Russian)

2. Kostyuchenko V.A., Krestinina L.Y. Long-term irradiation effects in the population evacuated from the East Urals radioactive trace area. The Science of the total Environment, 1994, Vol. 142, рp. 119-125.

3. Аkleev А.V., Kiselev M.F. Ecological and medical consequences of the radiation accident in 1957 at the Mayak PA. М., 2001, pр. 186- 212. (In Russian)

4. Аkleev А.V. The health status of the population of Chelyabinsk, Sverdlovsk and Kurgan regions, living in radioactively contaminated territories. Consequences of technogenic radiation exposure and the problem of rehabilitation of the Ural region. Ed. Shoygu S.K., М., Komtechprint, 2002, pp. 204-237. (In Russian)

5. Аkleev А.V. [et al.] The health of the population living on radioactive territories of the Ural region. М., RADECON, 2001, 194 p. (In Russian)

6. Krestinina L.Yu., Аkleev А.V. Cancer mortality under chronic exposure of low and moderate radiation doses in the cohort of persons who were exposed due to the EURT. Byulleten sibirskoy meditsiny = Bulletin of Siberian Medicine, 2005, Vol. 4, № 2, pр. 36-44. (In Russian)

7. Krestinina L.Yu, Silkin S.S., Epifanova S.B. Analysis of solid cancer mortality risk for the population exposed in the territory of East- Urals radioactive trace over a 50-year period. Radiatsionnaya gygiena = Radiation Hygiene, 2014, Vol. 7, № 1, pр. 23-29. (In Russian)

8. Tolstykh E.I., Shagina N.B., Peremyslova L.M. [et al.] Reconstruction of radionuclide intakes for the residents of East Urals Radioactive trace (1957-2011). Radiation andEnvironmental Biophysics, 2017. DOI 10.1007/s00411-016-0677-y PMID: 28102439.

9. Degteva M.O., Vorobiova M. I., Kozheurov V. P. [et al.] Dose reconstruction system for the exposed population living along the Techa River. Health Physics, 2000, 78(5):542-54.

10. Degteva M.O., Vorobiova M. I., Tolstykh E.I., Tokareva E. E. Development of an improved dose reconstruction system for the Techa River population affected by the operation of the Mayak Production Association. Radiation Research, 2006, Vol. 166, рp. 255–270.

11. Degteva M.O., Shagina N.B., Tolstykh E.I. Individual dose calculations with use of the Revised Techa River Dosimetry System TRDS-2009D/MO. Final Report for Milestone 22. Chelyabinsk, Russia and Salt Lake City, Utah: Urals Research Center for Radiation Medicine and University of Utah. 2009.

12. Napier B.A., Degteva M.O., Shagina N.B., Anspaugh L.R. Uncertainty Analysis for the Techa River Dosimetry System. Radiation safety, 2013, Vol. 58(1), рp. 5-28.

13. Shagina N.B., Fell T.P., Tolstykh E.I., Harrison J.D. [et al.] Strontium biokinetic model for the lactating woman and transfer to breast milk: application to Techa River studies. J Radiol Prot, 2015, 35(3), рp. 677-694.

14. Preston D.L., Lubin J.H., Pierce D.A., McConney M.E. Epicure Users Guide. Seattle, Washington: Hirosoft International Corporation; 1993.

15. Davis F.G., Yu K.L., Preston D. [et al.] Solid Cancer Incidence in the Techa River Incidence Cohort: 1956–2007. Radiation Research, 2015, Vol. 184, рp. 56–65.

16. Schonfeld S. J., Krestinina L.Y., Epifanova S. [et al.] Solid cancer mortality in the Techa River Cohort (1950-2007). Radiation Research. 2013, 179, рp.183-189.

17. Preston D.L., Sokolnikov M.E., Krestinina L.Y., Stram D.O. Estimates of radiation effects on cancer risks in The Mayak worker, Techa River and Atomic Bomb Survivor studies. Radiation Protection Dosimetry, 2016, рp. 1–6. Available from: doi:10.1093/rpd/ncw316.

18. Richardson D.B. [et al.] Risk of cancer from occupational exposure to ionising radiation: retrospective cohort study of workers in France, the United Kingdom, and the United States (INWORKS). BMJ, 2015, Vol. 351, H. 5359. Available from: doi: 10.1136/bmj.h5359.