Preview

Radiatsionnaya Gygiena = Radiation Hygiene

Advanced search

Analysis of the media coverage characteristics on radiation safety issues of the Saint-Petersburg and the Leningrad region population

https://doi.org/10.21514/1998-426X-2017-10-2-23-30

Abstract

The purpose of the study was to examine the quantity and quality of publications on radiation safety of the population in the media on the example of Saint Petersburg and the Leningrad region for the period of the first three-quarters of 2016. An analysis of publications in the media is an essential part of the work on the formation of an adequate perception of the radiation risk by the population. The Information and Analytical Centre of Rospotrebnadzor on radiation safety of the population developed a pilot computer-assisted system for the media publication analysis. The study was performed by this system as a development and improvement of the Center’s works applicable to the registration, storage, and analysis of qualitative and quantitative information contained in the publications. The author selected 27 mass-media sources for analysis: 8 newspapers (2 of them are located in Sosnoviy Bor); 8 TV-channels (4 – federal, 2 – regional, 2 – local in Sosnoviy Bor); 10 online media and the web-site of the Sosnoviy Bor administration. During the analyzed period, 1075 informational materials on issues of radiation safety were collected and added to the database. The largest number of publications were in the second quarter of 2016. The peak of publication activity on issues of radiation safety was registered in April. This fact is related to the 30th anniversary of the Chernobyl accident. A significant part (over 50%) of the publications were neutral in all media and in different types of media. A significant part of the publications is a brief informational note with the neutral nature of the character of the information. The number of materials with negative character of information among the publications on the subject of “radioactive waste” is more than 2 times larger than that for the publications on the subject of “nuclear energy”. The majority of publications belongs to the information genre. Analytical materials are a minor part and range from 1.6% to 8 % depending on the type of media. The testing of the computer-assisted system on the media publications analysis has shown its efficiency in terms of speed and agility of analysis and remote maintenance of the database, the possibility of further use it to analyze publications in media at the organization and optimization of risk communication in regions of the Russian Federation.

About the Author

A. M. Biblin
Saint-Petersburg Research Institute of Radiation Hygiene after Professor P.V. Ramzaev, Federal Service for Surveillance on Consumer Rights Protection and Human Well-Being
Russian Federation

Artem M. Biblin - Junior Researcher 

Address for correspondence: Mira Str., 8, Saint-Petersburg, 197101; E-mail: a.biblin@niirg.ru



References

1. Health and environment: communicating the risks. Copenhagen, WHO Regional Office for Europe, 2013, 68 p. (In Russian)

2. Onishchenko G.G. Principles of the health risk assessment of the chemicals that contaminate the environment. Ed. Rakhmanin Yu. A., Onishchenko G.G. М., 2002, 408 p. (In Russian)

3. Biblin А.М., Zykova I.А., Koroleva Т.М., Nikolaevich М.S. Methodological approaches to assessments of health risks in hygienic research. Radiatsionnaya gygiena=Radiation Hygiene, 2013, Vol. 6, No 2, pp. 32-38. (In Russian)

4. Sandman P. Responding to community outrage: strategies for effective risk communication, 5th ed. Fairfax VA, American Industrial Hygiene Association, 2003.

5. Sandman P. Outrage management (low hazard, high outrage). The Peter M. Sandman risk communication website. – Available from: http://www.psandman.com/index-OM.htlm (Accessed: February 12, 2017).

6. Arkhangelskaya G.V., Zykova I.А., Zelentsova S.А. The difficulties of informing the population on the issues of radiation protection. Radiatsionnaya gygiena = Radiation Hygiene, 2014, Vol. 7, No 2, pp. 42-49. (In Russian)

7. Zykova I.А., Zelentsova S.А., Arkhangelskaya G.V. Information requirements of population in different radiation-hygienic situations. Radiatsionnaya gygiena = Radiation Hygiene, 2013, Vol. 6, No 4, pp. 11-18. (In Russian)

8. Arkhangelskaya G.V., Zelentsova S.А., Zykova I.А. Assessment of the Fukusima nuclear power plant accident consequences by the population in the Far East. Radiatsionnaya gygiena = Radiation Hygiene, 2012, Vol. 5, No 4, pp. 12-20. (In Russian)

9. Zykova I.А., Garbuz Yu.А., Zelentsova S.А., Romanova О.B. Analysis of media publications on the Fukushima nuclear power plant accident. Radiatsionnaya gygiena = Radiation Hygiene, 2011, Vol. 4, No 3, pp. 43-49. (In Russian)

10. Zelentsova S.А., Arkhangelskaya G.V., Vishnyakova N.М., Zykova I.А., Repin V.S. Level of knowledge among the population of radiation safety basic issues. Radiatsionnaya gygiena = Radiation Hygiene, 2015, Vol. 8, No 4, PP. 43-49. (In Russian)

11. Zykova I.А., Zelentsova S.А., Kislov М.V. Subjective quality of life assessments and radioanxiety level among the young people living at the radioactive contaminated territories. Radiatsionnaya gygiena = Radiation Hygiene, 2011, Vol. 4, No 2, PP. 68-74. (In Russian)

12. Sandman P., Covello V. T. Risk Communication: Evolution and Revolution. Ed. A. B. Wolbarst. Solutions for an Environment in Peril. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press. 2001, pp. 164–178.

13. Perko T. Radiation risk perception: a discrepancy between the experts and the general population. J. Environ Radioact. 2014 Jul., Vol. 133. – Pp. 86-91.

14. Tomkiv Y., Perko T., Oughton D.H. The limits of public communication coordination in a nuclear emergency: lessons from media reporting on the Fukushima case. Journal of Radiological Protection. 2016, Vol. 26, No 2, pp. 45-63.

15. Mattsson S., Nilsson M. On the estimation of radiation-induced cancer risks from very low doses of radiation and how to communicate these risks. Radiat. Prot. Dosimetry. 2015 Jul., Vol. 165, No 1-4, pp. 17-21.

16. Covello V. Risk communication, radiation, and radiological emergencies: strategies, tools, and techniques. Health physics. November 2011, Vol. 101, Issue 5, pp. 511-530.

17. Repin L.V., Biblin A.M., Kovalev P.G. [et al.] The automated system of radiation exposure control for Rospotrebnadzor: creation history, applicability and development. Radiatsionnaya gygiena = Radiation Hygiene, 2014, Vol. 7, No 3, pp. 44-53. (In Russian)

18. Repin L.V., Biblin А.М., Bratilova А.А., Nikolaevich М.S. On the development of Information-Analytical Centre for Population Radiation Protection of Rospotrebnadzor. Radiatsionnaya gygiena = Radiation Hygiene, 2013, Vol. 6, No 3, pp. 59-62. (In Russian)


Review

For citations:


Biblin A.M. Analysis of the media coverage characteristics on radiation safety issues of the Saint-Petersburg and the Leningrad region population. Radiatsionnaya Gygiena = Radiation Hygiene. 2017;10(2):23-30. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.21514/1998-426X-2017-10-2-23-30

Views: 1137


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 1998-426X (Print)
ISSN 2409-9082 (Online)