Radon survey in Chelyabinsk Oblast, Russia, in 2008–2011. Analysis of spatial variability of indoor radon concentration

An extensive radon survey was conducted in 2008-2011 in the framework of the Federal target program on the territory of 29 districts of Chelyabinsk Oblast. SSNTDs were used to measure indoor radon concentrations in public buildings, dwellings and industrial buildings. The results are stored in the database “Radon” owned by Research and Technical Center of Radiation-Chemical Safety and Hygiene of Federal Medical-Biological Agency. The paper presents the results of the analysis of spatial variability of indoor radon concentration and the relationship of this value with a set of geological predictors of radon potential of the territory integrated into a map of ecological and radiogeochemical zones. The results show that in all districts and the whole Chelyabinsk Oblast radon concentrations conform to a lognormal distribution, but in ten districts log-logistic distribution fits the data slightly better. Nevertheless, relative difference between the median values of indoor radon concentration calculated from the two fitted distributions yields zero. The results show that dose assessment based on the arithmetic means could lead to an overestimation of the doses from radon in 1.4 times on average compared to that based on the medians. The median value does not exceed 400 Bq/m³ in any of the surveyed territories and the 95th percentile lies between 96 and 1274 Bq/m³. The fraction of indoor radon concentrations above 400 Bq/m³ expected from the fitted distribution lies between less than 0.1 and 26.8%. The highest values of this fraction were obtained for the Sosnovsky, Kaslinsky, Bredinsky districts and the Miassky urban district (except for the city of Miass). A map of ecological and radiogeochemical zones in Chelyabinsk Oblast was released in 1993-1995 and it was based on a set of geological predictors of radon potential of the territory. We analyzed the relationship of these zones with the results of the radon survey. One-way ANOVA on ranks with the Bonferroni correction showed that there is no statistically significant difference at the 95% confidence level amongst the medians of indoor radon concentration on basement, ground and first floors in settlements, which are located on the territory of three of four of these zones and outside of the territory of all zones. In the fourth zone the median was even two times lower than outside of the zones. These results lead to the conclusion that the possibility of using this map as a map of radon-prone areas is very doubtful. Each datapoint stored in the “Radon” database has a number of additional properties, which allows analyzing other types of indoor radon concentration variability such as seasonal or floor-to-floor. It is expected that later this dataset could be used for estimating regional seasonal correction factors.

1. Kiselev SM, Zhukovsky MV, Stamat IP, Yarmoshenko IV. Radon: From fundamental research to regulatory practice. Moscow: Russian State Research Center – Burnasyan Federal Medical Biophysical Center of Federal Medical-Biological Agency; 2016: 432. (In Russian)

2. Marennyy AM, Tsapalov AA, Miklyaev PS, Petrova TB. Regularities of radon field formation in the geological environment. Moscow: Pero; 2016: 394. (In Russian)

3. Miklyaev PS. What to do? Or the “radon” crisis in radiation research. ANRI = ANRI. 2005;3: 60–4. (In Russian)

4. Pavlov IV, Gulabyants LA, Marennyy AM, Okhrimenko SE. Tasks and methods of radiation control while constructing the buildings. ANRI = ANRI. 2003;3: 2–12. (In Russian)

5. Miklyaev PS, Petrova TB, Okhrimenko SE. New aspects of assessing the radon potential of urban areas. ANRI = ANRI. 2003;4: 63–71. (In Russian)

6. Marennyy AM, Okhrimenko SE, Pavlov IV. Tasks and methods for assessing the radon potential of residential areas. ANRI = ANRI. 2006;2: 25–30. (In Russian)

7. Miklyaev PS, Petrova TB. Mechanisms of radon flow formation from the soil surface and approaches to the assessment of the radon potential of residential areas. ANRI = ANRI. 2007;2: 2–16. (In Russian)

8. Marennyy AM. Radon in engineering and environmental research for construction. ANRI = ANRI. 2008;2: 21–8. (In Russian)

9. Dubois G, Bossew P, Tollefsen T, De Cort M. First steps towards a European atlas of natural radiation: status of the European indoor radon map. J. Environ. Radioact. 2010;101(10): 786–98.

10. Tollefsen T, Cinelli G, Bossew P, Gruber V, De Cort M. From the European Indoor Radon Map Towards an Atlas of Natural Radiation. Radiat. Prot. Dosimetry. 2014;162(1-2): 129–34.

11. Miklyaev PS, Petrova TB, Marennyy AM. European Atlas of Natural Radiation – the Current Status, Problems, Prospects. ANRI = ANRI. 2019;2(97): 27–42. (In Russian)

12. European Indoor Radon Map. – Available from: https://remon.jrc.ec.europa.eu/About/Atlas-of-Natural-Radiation/Digital-Atlas/Indoor-radon-AM/Indoor-radon-concentration (Accessed: 20 July 2020)

13. Romanovich IK, Stamat IP, Kormanovskaya TA, Kononenko DV. Natural sources of ionizing radiation: radiation doses, radiation risks, preventive measures. Saint- Petersburg: FBUN NIIRG im. P.V. Ramzaeva; 2018: 432. (In Russian)

14. Maksimovskiy VA, Kharlamov MG, Maltsev AV, Luchin IA, Smyslov AA. Zoning of the territory of Russia according to the radon potential. ANRI = ANRI. 1996/97;3(9): 66–73. (In Russian)

15. Marennyy AM, Andreev NM, Astafurov VI, Gubin AT, Dmitriev VA, Marennyy MA, et al. Long-term measurements of indoor radon concentration in the settlements of Chelyabinks Oblast, Russia. In: Scientific and practical conference with international participation “Current issues of radiation hygiene”; 2010 Jun 7-9; Saint-Petersburg; 2010: 98–9. (In Russian)

16. Kononenko DV. Analysis of distributions of indoor radon concentrations in the regions of the Russian Federation. Radiatsionnaya Gygiena = Radiation Hygiene. 2019;12(1): 85–103. (In Russian)

17. Daraktchieva Z, Miles JC, McColl N. Radon, the lognormal distribution and deviation from it. J. Radiol. Prot. 2014;34(1): 183–90.

18. Murphy P, Organo C. A comparative study of lognormal, gamma and beta modelling in radon mapping with recommendations regarding bias, sample sizes and the treatment of outliers. J. Radiol. Prot. 2008;28(3): 293–302.

19. Jimenez R, Hidalgo M, Klimek P. Supplementary Materials for Testing for voter rigging in small polling stations. Sci. Adv. 2017;3: e1602363. – Available from: https://advances.sciencemag.org/content/suppl/2017/06/26/3.6.e1602363.DC1 (Accessed: 20 July 2020)

20. Cimbala JM. Outliers. – Available from: https://www.me.psu.edu/cimbala/me345/Lectures/Outliers.pdf (Accessed: 20 July 2020)

21. An American National Standard. Test Uncertainty. ASME PTC 19.1-2005 (Revision of ASME PTC 19.1-1998). New York: The American Society of Mechanical Engineers; 2006: 92.

22. Hoaglin DC, Iglewicz B. Fine-Tuning Some Resistant Rules for Outlier Labeling. J. Am. Stat. Assoc. 1987;82(400): 1147–9.

23. Tukey JW. Exploratory Data Analysis. Addison-Wesley Pub. Co.; 1977: 688.

24. Hoaglin DC, Iglewicz B, Tukey JW. Performance of Some Resistant Rules for Outlier Labeling. J. Am. Stat. Assoc. 1986;81(396): 991–9.

25. McLaughlin MP. Compendium of Common Probability Distributions. 2016; Second Edition, 2.7: 128. – Available from: https://www.causascientia.org/math_stat/Dists/Compendium.pdf (Accessed: 20 July 2020)

26. Romanovich IK, Stamat IP, Kormanovskaya TA, Balabina TA, Koroleva NA, Istorik OA, et al. Results of sampling analysis of radon content in preschool and school organizations in the Leningrad region. Zdorovie naseleniya i sreda obitaniya = Public Health and Life Environment. 2017;10(295): 46–9. (In Russian)

27. Kiselev SM, Zhukovsky MV. Modern approaches to public protection against indoor radon. International regulatory experience. Radiatsionnaya Gygiena = Radiation Hygiene. 2014;7(4): 52–5.

28. Kiselev SM. Evolution of Approaches of ICRP to the Regulations of Protection of the Population from Radon. Meditsinskaya radiologiya i radiatsionnaya bezopasnost’ = Medical Radiology and Radiation Safety. 2016;61(2): 70–4. (In Russian)

29. Kiselev SM. Formation of modern methodology of the regulation of protection population from radiation with radon. Gigiena i Sanitaria = Hygiene and Sanitation. 2017;96(1): 52–6. (In Russian)

30. Kiselev SM, Stamat IP, Marenny AM, Ilyin LA. Provision of the public radiological protection against radon exposure. Challenges and resolutions. Gigiena i Sanitaria = Hygiene and Sanitation. 2018;97(2): 101–10. (In Russian)

31. Kiselev SM, Marennyy AM, Romanov VV. Radon. Advanced regulatory approaches to public radiation protection. Radiatsionnaya Gygiena = Radiation Hygiene. 2019;12(2): 94–102. (In Russian)

32. Svetovidov AV, Venkov VA, Stamat IP, Gorsky GA. Protection of buildings from radon: first experiments on the development and implementation of protective measures. In: Scientific and practical conference “Modern problems of radiation safety of the population”. St. Petersburg; 2006: 41–4. (In Russian)

33. Svetovidov AV, Venkov VA, Gorsky GA. Experience in radon mitigation in the operating buildings. Radiatsionnaya Gygiena = Radiation Hygiene. 2009;2(4): 35–9. (In Russian)

34. European Atlas of Natural Radiation: https://remon.jrc.ec.europa.eu/About/Atlas-of-Natural-Radiation/Digital-Atlas (Accessed: 20 July 2020)

35. European Geogenic Radon Map: https://remon.jrc.ec.europa.eu/About/Atlas-of-Natural-Radiation/Digital-Atlas/Geogenic-radon/Geogenic-radon Accessed: 20 July 2020)

36. Zhukovsky MV, Yarmoshenko IV. Radon: measurements, doses, risk assessment. Ekaterinburg: UB RAS, Institute of Industrial Ecology; 1997: 231. (In Russian)

37. Utkin VI, Chebotina MYa, Evstigneev AV, Ekidin AA, Rybakov EN, Trapeznikov AV, et al. Radioactive troubles of the Urals. Ekaterinburg: UB RAS; 2000: 93. (In Russian)

38. Burke O, Long S, Murphy P, Organo C, Fenton D, Colgan PA. Estimation of seasonal correction factors through Fourier decomposition analysis – a new model for indoor radon levels in Irish homes. J Radiol Prot. 2010 Sep;30(3): 433–43.