Stages of radiation monitoring on the territory of the Tula region affected in consequence of the Chernobyl NPP accident
https://doi.org/10.21514/1998-426X-2022-15-3-116-123
Abstract
More than half of the Tula oblast territory was contaminated following the accident at the Chernobyl nuclear power plant. This article describes the stages of radiation hygiene monitoring of objects in the habitat in the Tula region impacted by radioactive contamination. Information is given on changes in radioactively contaminated areas at different periods after the accident. An assessment is made of the radiological situation at the initial “iodic” period of the accident, the subsequent “cesium” period, and at the current stage. A description is given of work done by the oblast’s state sanitary and epidemiological service based on radiation monitoring results for reducing the radiation exposure of the population at different stages of supervision. Information is supplied on high levels of gamma background up to 35 mkSv/h during the “iodic” period. Tabulated data are supplied on exceeding the tentative maximum permissible level of iodine-131 content in dairy products produced in Plavski district, the most contaminated area in the region. Data are given on laboratory tests on food products for total beta activity in 1986-87 and the frequency of exceeding the permissible level of cesium-137 content during 1986. The above permissible content of radionuclides in food products was registered only in 1986 due to surface contamination of plants, while in wild mushrooms this took place as late as 2004. Currently, the proved content of cesium-137 and strontium-90 in food products is determined only by the radio-chemical method. A table is supplied showing results of radio-chemical research on major dose contributing food products from 2010 to 2021. The article supplies a table with numeric values of annual average effective doses of radiation sustained by the population of settlements located in the Chernobyl radioactively contaminated zone during 1986 through 2021. The dose of the population’s exposure to the Chernobyl radiation since 1994 does not exceed 1 mSv/year. In 2021, the population’s annual effective dose in 98.3% of settlements amounted to less than 0.2 mSv/year.
About the Authors
V. V. BoldyrevaRussian Federation
Viktoriya V. Boldyreva – Chief Medical Officer
Oboronnaya str, 114, Tula, 300045
V. N. Ovcharova
Russian Federation
Valentina N. Ovcharova – Head of Radiological Laboratory
Oboronnaya str, 114, Tula, 300045
References
1. Onishchenko GG. The Chernobyl – Thirty Years After The Post – Accidental Radiological – Hygienic and Medical Consequences. Radiatsionnaya Gygiena = Radiation Hygiene. 2016;9(2):10-19. (In Russian).
2. Radiological and Hygienic Issues of the Mitigation of the Chernobyl NPP Accident Consequences / Edited by Academician of the Russian Academy of Sciences Onishchenko GG and Professor Popova AYu. St.-Petersburg: RIRH after prof. P.V. Ramzaev; 2016. Vol. 1. 448 p. (In Russian).
3. Boldyreva VV, Ovcharova VV. The Thirty Years’ Results of Radiation Hygienic Monitoring of Tula Region territories contaminated due to the Chernobyl NPP accident. Radiatsionnaya Gygiena = Radiation Hygiene. 2016;9(2):48-55. (In Russian).
4. Bruk GYa, Bazyukin AB, Barkovsky AN, Bratilova AA, Vlasov AYu, Goncharova YuN, et al. The exposure for populations of the Russian Federation due to the Chernobyl accident and main directions of further work in the coming period. Radiatsionnaya Gygiena = Radiation Hygiene. 2014;7(4):72-83. (In Russian).
5. Bratilova AA, Bruk GYa. Influence of the consumption of different foodstuffs on the internal exposure dose formation in the adult population of the Russian Federation after the accident at the Chernobyl NPP. Radiatsionnaya Gygiena = Radiation Hygiene. 2018;11(2):53-59. (In Russian).
Review
For citations:
Boldyreva V.V., Ovcharova V.N. Stages of radiation monitoring on the territory of the Tula region affected in consequence of the Chernobyl NPP accident. Radiatsionnaya Gygiena = Radiation Hygiene. 2022;15(3):116-123. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.21514/1998-426X-2022-15-3-116-123