Dynamics of 137Cs concentrations in agricultural products after the Chernobyl accident: cereals, potato, and vegetables

The purpose of the study was to analyze the regularities of ¹³⁷Cs concentrations in grain, potatoes and vegetables in the areas affected the Chernobyl accident. The data describing the countermeasures in the south-western districts of the Bryansk region are given. The system of radiological monitoring of plant products is described and the relevant data are presented. Dynamics of concentrations both in grain and in potatoes and vegetables had a pronounced heterogeneous character. Reduction of ¹³⁷Cs concentration in crop production (grain, potato, and vegetables) was determined by the dynamics of agrochemical countermeasures in the contaminated areas, sorption of ¹³⁷Cs in soil and radioactive decay. It has been revealed that effective halflives of ¹³⁷Cs in the above products during intensive implementation of rehabilitation measures (1987-1990) varied within the range from 0,7 up to 1,3 years. Subsequently, in 1991-2011, the decrease of contamination of products slowed down, and in some areas with intensive application of protective measures a certain increase of ¹³⁷Cs content in products was noted. Effective half-lives during that period ranged 10.5-29 years depending on the peculiarities of application of countermeasures and soil characteristics. The pattern of the ¹³⁷Cs concentrations in the grain produced in different districts from 2011 to 2021 also differed depending on the history of the countermeasures’ application in those districts in the previous periods. The estimation of the effective half-life, equal to 18.2 years, for predicting the reduction of plant product contamination in the long term after the Chernobyl accident has been suggested. 

1. Alexakhin RM. Radioecological Lessons of Chernobyl. Radiation Biology. Radioecology. 1993;33(1): 3-14. (In Russian).

2. Fesenko SV, Alexakhin RM, Sanzharova NI, Spiridonov SI. Dynamics of 137Cs concentration in agricultural products in areas of Russia contaminated as a result of the accident at the Chernobyl nuclear power plant. Radiation Protection Dosimetry. 1995;60(2): 155-166.

3. Alexakhin RM, Fesenko SV, Sanzharova NI. Serious radiation accidents and the radiological impact on agriculture. Radiation Protection Dosimetry. 1996;64: 37–42.

4. Radioecological consequences of the Chernobyl accident: biological effects, migration, rehabilitation of contaminated areas: Monograph Edited by Sanzharova N.I. and Fesenko S.V. Moscow: RAS; 2018. 278 p. – Available from: https://rirae.ru/index.php/deyatelnost/publikatsii-fgb-nu-vniirae/444-osnovnye-nauchnye-publikatsii-sotrudnikov-fgbnu-vniirae-v-2018-g (Accessed July 05, 2022) (In Russian).

5. Jacob P, Fesenko S, Firsakova SK, Likhtarev IA, Schotola C, Alexakhin RM, et al. Remediation strategies for rural territories contaminated by the Chernobyl accident. Journal of Environmental Radioactivity. 2001;56: 51-76.

6. Fesenko SV, Jacob P, Alexakhin R, Sanzharova NI, Panov A, Fesenko G, et al. Important factors governing exposure of the population and countermeasure application in rural settlements of the Russian Federation in the long term after the Chernobyl accident. Journal of Environmental Radioactivity. 2001;56: 77-98.

7. Alexakhin RM, Sanzharova NI, Fesenko SV, Spiridonov SI, Panov AV. Chernobyl radionuclide distribution, migration, and environmental and agricultural impacts. Health Physics. 2007;93(5): 418–426.

8. Fesenko SV, Alexakhin RM, Balonov MI, Bogdevitch IM, Howard BJ, Kashparov VA, et al. An extended critical review of twenty years of countermeasures used in agriculture after the Chernobyl accident. Science of the Total Environment. 2007;383: 1-24.

9. IAEA, 2006. International Atomic Energy Agency. Environmental Consequences of the Chernobyl Accident and Their Remediation: Twenty Years of Experience. Report of the UN Chernobyl Forum Expert Group “Environment” (EGE). International Atomic Energy Agency, Vienna. IAEA, 2009. 166 p.

10. Handbook on Radiation Situation and Doses of Exposure Received in 1991 by Population of Russian Federation Territories Subjected to Radioactive Contamination as a Result of Chernobyl Accident. Ed. Balonov M.I. St. Petersburg: Ariadna-Arkadia Publishing House; 1993. (In Russian).

11. Handbook on the Radiation and Hygienic Situation in Areas Affected by Radioactive Contamination after the Chernobyl Accident. Moscow; 1997. 160 p. (In Russian).

12. Markina ZN, Kurganov AA, Vorobyov GT. Radioactive contamination of crop production in Bryansk Region. Bryansk Center “Agrokhimradiology”, Bryansk; 1997: 242 p. (In Russian).

13. Prudnikov PV. The use of agronomic ores and new complex mineral fertilizers on radioactively contaminated soils. Bryansk, FGBU Center of Chemicalization and Agricultural Radiology “Bryansk”; 2012: 232 p. (In Russian).

14. Geraskin SA, Fesenko SV, Chernyaeva LG, Sanzharova NI. Statistical methods of analysis of empirical distributions of radionuclide accumulation factors by plants. Agricultural Biology; 1991(1): 130-137. (In Russian).

15. Ayvazyan SA, Enyukov IS, Meshalkin LD. Applied statistics. Fundamentals of modeling and primary data processing. Мoscow: Nauka; 1983. (In Russian).

16. Zaks L. Statistical estimation. Мoscow: Nauka; 1976. (In Russian).

17. Fesenko SV, Colgan PA, Sanzharova NI, Lissianki KB, Vazquez C, Guardans R. The dynamics of the transfer of caesium-137 to animal fodder is areas of Russia affected by the Chernobyl accident and resulting doses from the consumption of milk and milk products. Radiation Protection Dosimetry. 1997;69(4): 289–299.

18. Fesenko SV, Alexakhin RM, Spiridonov SI, Sanzharova NI. Dynamics of 137Cs concentration in agricultural products in areas of Russia subjected to contamination after the accident at the Chernobyl nuclear power plant. Radiation Protection Dosimetry. 1995;60(2): 155–166.

19. Pröhl G, Ehlken S, Fiedler I, Kirchner G, Klemt E, Zibold G. Ecological half-lives of 90Sr and 137Cs in terrestrial and aquatic ecosystems. Journal of Environmental Radioactivity. 2006;91(1–2): 41–72.